University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90089, United States
NCT Number: NCT00847769
The purpose of this study is to determine changes in the brain associated with improvement in ankle range of motion following ankle manual therapy procedures in individuals with post-acute ankle sprains
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Los Angeles, California, 90089, United States
Physical therapists use many ways to treat joints that do not move well. One way takes 1-2 seconds. Another way may take up to 1 minute. Both stretches seem to work, but we do not know how. Certain changes in the brain and spinal cord may cause joints to become more flexible after these kinds of stretches. Right now, we do not have very much information about how these might work in people who have injured their ankle. This study will find out if changes in the brain cause better flexibility in the ankle joint after different kinds of stretches. In this study, subjects with a certain kind of ankle sprains and limited ankle joint flexibility will be assigned to 1 out of 3 groups. Subjects will not get to choose their groups. The first group will have an ankle stretch that lasts 1-2 seconds. The second group will have a stretch that last 1 minute. The third group will have their foot held without any stretching. We will use a machine to stimulate the brain and spinal cord to find out how these stretches affect the brain and spinal cord. The machine sends a magnetic signal to the brain, and we will measure how much signal gets through to the leg muscles using electrodes on the skin. We also will use 3 flexibility tests to find out how well each stretch worked. One test is with the subject lying on their stomach, and the others are with the subject standing up. To start the study, subjects will get their brain stimulated. They will then get their brain stimulated again one hour later. After the second stimulation, subjects will have their flexibility tested and then get 1 of the 3 treatments. After the treatment, subjects will get a last brain stimulation test and flexibility tests. We think subjects that get a fast stretch will have better brain function and flexibility than subjects that get the slow stretch or no stretch. To test our idea, we will compare how each group did with the brain stimulation and flexibility tests. We will also look at the relationship between brain function and flexibility.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction manipulation. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. A thrust will be delivered parallel to the long axis of the subject's lower leg after the treating therapist induces passive ankle dorsiflexion to end range.
Other names: Manipulation, GPM-V
This group (n=9) will receive talocrural traction mobilization. With the subject in a seated position on a treatment table and the lower extremity of interest stabilized to the table with a belt, a single standardized treating investigator will grasp the foot of interested with the thenar eminences on the foot's plantar surface. Traction will be delivered to the talocrural joint at the treating investigator's second perception of tissue resistance in 3 bouts of 30-second holds, separated by 10 seconds of rest.
Other names: Articulation, Mobilization, Traction
This group (n=9) will receive the manual therapy control intervention. This will consist of the same patient and clinician preparation for the mobilization/manipulation techniques. However, a single standardized treating investigator will simply maintain passive ankle positioning for the duration of 1 deep inhalation and exhalation by the subject rather than induce an iatrogenic force characteristic of the intervention received by the other 2 comparison groups.
Other names: Passive Range of Motion, Placebo
Time frame: Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement
Time frame: Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement
Time frame: Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement
Time frame: Pre-intervention measurement, 1 additional repeated pre-intervention measurement, post-intervention measurement
University of Southern California
Other
Effect of Manual Therapy Intervention on Corticospinal Excitability in Individuals With Post-acute Ankle Sprains
Acronym: ACE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07655973
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprain
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07154433
Ankle (Ligaments); Instability (Old Injury), Ankle Injuries
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06934629
Ankle Dynamic Balance, Ankle Injuries
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07475663
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprain
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial Details