Physiotherapy Department, Holy Family Hospital.
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT06582303
The study was a randomized control trial conducted to determine whether VR games incorporated with cognitive engagement within visual training feedback are feasible intervention options in stroke rehabilitation. An investigation has been conducted to assess the efficacy of virtual reality games that enhance hand motor functions to attain long-lasting improvements. Patients were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Each patient's therapy consists of 24 sessions, with each session lasting 4 days per week, for a total duration of 6 weeks. Developed four VR-based hand games that include hitting a rolling ball, grasping a balloon, swapping hands, and gripping a pencil.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
The field of stroke rehabilitation frequently faces limitations in therapies and struggles to achieve long-lasting improvements in hand motor function. The integration of fully immersive virtual reality (VR) games with visual training feedback significantly improves the efficacy of stroke rehabilitation. Virtual reality (VR) games that incorporate repetitive and particular tasks stimulate the gradual activation of brain pathways linked to motor activities. VR research has the potential to enhance VR intervention games by combining cognitive engagement with visual feedback.
The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate virtual reality games that utilize an approach of cognitive engagement within visual feedback in order to enhance hand-motor capabilities. The study utilized completely immersive virtual reality (VR) games specifically designed for subacute stroke patients. The implementation of fully immersive virtual reality (VR) games as an intervention proved to be highly effective in significantly maintaining the motor recovery of patients who had experienced a stroke in the subacute phase. Stroke patients exhibited enhanced dexterity, heightened range of motion, greater hand strength, and improved grip.
Developed VR games utilize a virtual reality device and are designed to be controlled by hand movements such as flexion/extension, close/open, supination/pronation, and pinch. Patients were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received a VR hand game intervention with conventional physical therapy, while the control group only received conventional physical therapy. Each patient's therapy consists of 24 sessions, with each session lasting 4 days per week for a total duration of 6 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group initially got VR intervention by playing all four easy-level games named hitting a rolling ball, grasping a balloon, swapping hands, and gripping twice for three minutes each during the first and second weeks. This group again underwent VR intervention by playing all four same games with a difficulty level twice 5 min duration for the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth weeks. The experimental group had an intervention of 24 sessions, lasting 4 days/week for a total of 6 weeks. During the first two weeks, patients received 24 minutes of VR hand games and 24 minutes of therapy sessions per day and for the next four weeks, this group received 40 minutes of VR hand games and 40 minutes of conventional therapy session per day. This group received conventional physical therapy that consists of range of motion, stretching, resistance, and strengthening exercises. At follow-up of two weeks this group only received conventional physical therapy.
Other names: VRGI+CPT
The control group received conventional physical therapy, which consists of range of motion, stretching, resistance, and strengthening exercises by using powerweb, thera putty, and occupational therapy equipment. The CPT group had a conventional intervention of 24 sessions, lasting 4 days/week for a total of 6 weeks. The CPT group was given 48 minutes of conventional physical therapy sessions per day for weeks 1 and 2 followed by 80 minutes of conventional physical therapy sessions per day for the next 4 weeks. At follow-up of two weeks, this group also received conventional physical therapy.
Other names: CPT
Time frame: Baseline, 4th week, 6th week, and 9th week (follow-up)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity subscale was employed to examine the motor function restoration in the upper extremity of stroke patients following interventions. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity consists of 33 items that assess motor function, with a scoring range of 0-66, The minimum score 0 represents severe impairment, and maximum score 66 represents normal motor function. Higher scores indicate better motor function.
Time frame: Baseline, 4th week, 6th week, and 9th week (follow-up)
The Action Research Arm Test is utilized to examine the functional capabilities of stroke patients upper extremities, specifically in terms of reaching, gripping, pinching, and overall movement tasks. Each item is allocated a rating score of 4 points, with the potential total values ranging from 0 to 57. The minimum score 0 represents severe impairment, and the maximum score 57 represents normal upper extremity function. Higher scores on the Action Research Arm Test indicate better functional capabilities of the upper extremities.
Time frame: Baseline, 4th week, 6th week, and 9th week (follow-up)
The BBT evaluated the manual dexterity of individuals who had suffered a stroke. During this assessment, participants are required to transfer blocks from one container to another within a one-minute time limit.
Time frame: Baseline, 4th week, 6th week, and 9th week (follow-up)
Electromyography signals are obtained in order to evaluate the electrical activity generated by muscles. Electromyography was utilized for the objective assessment of the effectiveness of immersive VR-based hand games. The objective assessment includes the evaluation of the correlation between electromyography signal features and clinical outcomes, which includes the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity, Action Research Arm Test, and Box and Block Test.
Time frame: Baseline, 4th week, 6th week, and 9th week (follow-up)
The weekly movement performance was evaluated by machine learning algorithms that include k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine classifiers on the electromyography signals of stroke patients.
Time frame: Baseline and 9th week (follow-up)
The Modified Barthel Index assesses an individual's ability to perform both practical and routine tasks independently. The Modified Barthel Index consists of 10 items, each scored based on the level of assistance required or the level of autonomy demonstrated by the patient. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 20. Lower scores indicate greater dependence, with scores below 10 typically representing severe disability and scores below 15 usually indicating moderate disability. Moreover, higher scores reflect greater independence in performing daily activities.
Time frame: Baseline and 9th week (follow-up)
The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life measure was used to assess the health-related quality of life of stroke survivors. The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale consists of 49 comprehensive items that evaluate various aspects of quality of life based on the patient's current state. The total score ranges from a minimum of 49 to a maximum of 245. Lower scores indicate poorer health-related quality of life, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
National University of Science and Technology, Pakistan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04187209
Behavior, Brain Diseases
Berck, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03243318
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04694001
Behavior, Brain Diseases
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04289766
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details