Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05918900

Analyses of Malnutrition Screening in Internal Medicine

The goal of this observational study is to study the presence and consequences of malnutrition risk in hospitalized internal medicine patients.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. How many patients are at risk of malnutrition at admission? 2. Is there a link between an existing malnutrition risk and nutrition therapy that the patients receive? 3. Is there a link between an existing malnutrition risk and clinical outcome (e.g. length of hospital stay, mortality, need for rehospitalization)?

Participants will be screened for malnutrition risk at admission using a validated questionnaire (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). All relevant data regarding hospital stay will be obtained from the clinical information system after discharge.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Malnutrition Nutrition Disorders Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Medicine Greifswald

Greifswald, 17475, Germany

About this study

Malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcome in hospitalized patients. Therefore, systematic screening for malnutrition risk at admission is recommended by almost all medical expert societies to identify patients who will benefit from nutritional therapy.

Although clinical and economic benefit of systematic malnutrition screening have been shown in various settings and for different patient groups, such screening is still not mandatory in most countries. In part, establishment of malnutrition screening is hampered by discrepant findings on the prevalence of malnutrition risk and the lack of evidence on a local level.

Hence, in this observational study the investigators examine the results of systematic malnutrition screening in internal medicine patients admitted to a university hospital in Northeast Germany. In particular, the investigators aim to determine the prevalence of malnutrition risk at hospital admission, the association between malnutrition risk and nutrition therapy as well as clinical outcome in different disciplines of internal medicine.

For this purpose, all patients undergo screening for malnutrition risk at admission using a validated instrument (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002). All relevant data regarding the patients' hospital stay will be obtained from the clinical information system after discharge.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • hospital admission for gastrointestinal, endocrine, rheumatic, or nephrological condition
  • provision of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • inability to provide consent
  • unfeasibility to perform malnutrition screening within 48h after admission

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall presence of malnutrition risk

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in all internal medicine patients at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence of malnutrition risk in gastroenterology

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with gastrointestinal disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  2. Presence of malnutrition risk in endocrinology

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with endocrine disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  3. Presence of malnutrition risk in rheumatology

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with rheumatic disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  4. Presence of malnutrition risk in nephrology

    Time frame: Baseline

    Prevalence of malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, in patients with nephrological disease at hospital admission. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  5. Relation of malnutrition risk to nutritional consultation

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and number of nutritional consultations. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  6. Relation of malnutrition risk to nutritional diagnosis

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and nutritional diagnosis resulting from nutritional assessment by an expert dietitian. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  7. Relation of malnutrition risk to intensive care treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and admission to an intensive care unit. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  8. Relation of malnutrition risk to intermediate care treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and admission to an intermediate care unit. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  9. Relation of malnutrition risk to mortality

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and in-hospital mortality. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  10. Relation of malnutrition risk to length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and length of hospital stay measured in days. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  11. Relation of malnutrition risk and 30-day readmission

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after discharge. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

  12. Relation of malnutrition risk and 90-day readmission

    Time frame: Baseline

    Association between malnutrition risk, i.e. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) score >= 3 points, and unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days after discharge. NRS-2002 score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating greater nutritional risk.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medicine Greifswald

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Descriptive and Comparative Analyses of Malnutrition Screening in Internal Medicine

Acronym: AMASIN

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jun 26, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 8, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.