El-Galaa Hospital
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT01290289
To compare combined spinal epidural, epidural and IV pethidine analgesia and their effects on the mother, fetus, newborn and the course of labor.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
This is a prospective parallel single blind study, which was approved by the institutional review board of El-Galaa Teaching Hospital, and the research and ethics committee of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University.
This hospital per si was selected for the study because it is large hospital that could provide the study with a diverse population. It has a population of various socio-economic statuses. This would provide the study with a sample of patients with a wide range of characteristics.
Sixty full-term, ASA physical status I or II nulliparous women in active labor with cervical dilatation of 5 cm and cephalic presenting fetus were randomly assigned to one of five groups after providing informed consent.
Study Subjects Excluding Criteria Patients who had diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, pre-eclampsia, or patients who had received parenteral analgesics or patients with contraindication to E or spinal analgesia, or patients with sensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids were excluded from the study.
Study Method All the recruited subjects were screened before the administration of any analgesia. Systolic and diastolic pressures, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored. Fetal heart rate (FHR) was monitored using an external cardiotocograph monitor (Partoconter NST Nihon Kohden).
For the E groups, the degree of motor block was assessed according to a modified Bromage scale (Grade I: free movement of legs and feet; Grade II: just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III: unable to flex knees, but with free movements of feet; Grade IV: unable to move legs or feet) before administration of E analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after the first dose. The start of the analgesia was regarded as time 0. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time from the beginning of analgesic injection (time 0) to the time of request for additional analgesia.
The number of analgesic top-ups was recorded and the intervals between each top-up, in addition to the volume and concentration of the drug injected.
The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain imaginable) was measured before administration of analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after administration of each analgesic dose until the delivery of the baby.
Maternal arterial pressures, heart rate, SpO2, and FHR were noted before the analgesia was given, and afterwards every 30 minutes until delivery.
Maternal temperature was recorded before starting the analgesic regimen and thereafter every hour till the end of labor. Fever was defined as temperature of ≥ 38˚C.
The duration of each stage of labor together with the mode of delivery were recorded.
The total volume of drug injected, total concentration of drug injected, 1-min and 5-min APGAR scores, weight of the neonate were recorded.
Any experienced drug related problem by any of the recruited subjects were recorded.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
full-term, ASA physical status I or II nulliparous women in active labor with cervical dilatation of 5 cm and cephalic presenting fetus
Exclusion criteria
Patients who had diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, pre-eclampsia, or patients who had received parenteral analgesics or patients with contraindication to E or spinal analgesia, or patients with sensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids were excluded from the study.
Gp 1: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl & a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected.
Gp 2: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl & a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected.
Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia & a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8%.
Gp 4: received analgesia: 50µg of E fentanyl & a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25%.
Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.
Time frame: 24 hours
The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain imaginable) was measured before administration of analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after administration of each analgesic dose until the delivery of the baby.
Time frame: 24 hours
The degree of motor block was assessed according to a modified Bromage scale (Grade I: free movement of legs and feet; Grade II: just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III: unable to flex knees, but with free movements of feet; Grade IV: unable to move legs or feet) before administration of E analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after the first dose. The start of the analgesia was regarded as time 0. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time from the beginning of analgesic injection (time 0) to the time of request for additional analgesia.
Time frame: 24 hours
The number of analgesic top-ups was recorded and the intervals between each top-up, in addition to the volume and concentration of the drug injected.
Time frame: 24 hours
Any experienced drug related problem by any of the recruited subjects were recorded.
Time frame: 24 hours
The duration of each stage of labor together with the mode of delivery were recorded.
Cairo University
Other
Analgesia in Labor, a Prospective Parallel Single Blind Study to Compare Regional Analgesia (Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia (CSE), Epidural Analgesia (E)) and Intravenous (IV) Pethidine Analgesia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07056062
Dystocia, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Colton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07278271
Labor Active Dilated Cm
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07250620
Labor Active Dilated Cm, Normal Pregnancy
View Trial Details