Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07250620

Comparison Between Using 10min CTG in Fetal Monitoring Instead of 30min Monitoring in Low Resources Overcrowded Hospitals.

Cardiotocography (CTG) is a cornerstone of intrapartum fetal monitoring but requires a minimum of 30 minutes for a reliable trace, creating a significant bottleneck in high-volume, low-resource settings like Egypt As it is time-consuming and resource intensive. This leads to delays in care and increased workload for healthcare providers. A shortened, yet accurate, CTG protocol could drastically improve workflow and resource allocation without compromising fetal safety.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

About this study

In Egypt, labor wards in tertiary hospitals are often overcrowded with limited CTG machines and midwives. The requirement of a minimum 30-minute CTG trace creates bottlenecks in care and increases staff workload. Previous studies suggest that the first 10 minutes of a CTG may capture the essential features of fetal well-being. If validated, a shortened CTG could improve efficiency in high-volume maternity units without compromising neonatal outcomes. Using umbilical venous pH as the gold standard for fetal acid-base status, this study will directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of a 10-minute versus a 30-minute CTG protocol in low-risk laboring women. The aim is to evaluate whether a 10-minute CTG tracing is non-inferior to the standard 30 minute CTG in fetal assessment and predicting fetal acid-base status (umbilical venous pH) in term, low-risk pregnancies during the active first stage of labor.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.
  • Vertex presentation.
  • Active first stage of labor (cervical dilation ≥ 4 cm).
  • Low-risk pregnancy (no hypertension, diabetes, IUGR, or other significant complications).

Exclusion criteria

  • • Multiple gestation.
  • Known major fetal anomaly.
  • Non-vertex presentation.
  • Indication for continuous CTG (e.g., meconium-stained liquor, antepartum hemorrhage).
  • Maternal refusal.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of a 10 minute CTG versus a standard 30-minute CTG in fetal monitoring and well being

    Time frame: Immediately after birth

    Using fetal acidemia defined as (umbilical venous pH < 7.25) as reference in detecting fetal will being and comparing results with 10-min & 30-min CTG monitoring to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of both in detecting fetal acidemia.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Seif Ahmed Ali, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+20 1004971596

Soliman Mohamed Alazhary, Master

CONTACT

[email protected]

+20 1143883568

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assiut University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Diagnostic Accuracy of 10-Minute Vs 30-Minute CTG in Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring.

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.