Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04112992

An International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry on Post-traumatic Long Bones Defects

Long bone defect (LBD) is defined as a focalized loss of bone tissue in any long bone of the upper or lower extremity. Long bone defects are a complex problem, that may arise as a complication of many different pathologies, such as trauma, tumors or infection. Whereas post-traumatic defects are the largest group.

Reports estimate that there are almost 4 million bone grafting procedures worldwide per year. However, limb reconstruction in the context of a bony defect is challenging and up to date there is little evidence and treatment recommendations.

In a multi-national approach, the aim of this project is to set up an international, multicenter registry to gather information and details on prevalence or incidence, current treatments, complications and outcome.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The purpose of this project is to set up an international, multicenter registry of patient presenting with defects in long bones. Up to date, treatment remains challenging with little evidenced-based recommendations.

For this purpose, any patient who presents at a study center with a bone defect of the defined expansion of any long bone is eligible for inclusion. Over a 3-year period as many patients as possible are included from the participating sites, at least 600 patients should be included in the registry. Details on any surgical intervention that is used to treat a bone defect will be recorded. Further patient-related and other pre-defined outcome measures will be collected.

There is no formal hypothesis to this registry, hence it will help to identify prevalence and underlying etiologies, evaluate treatment strategies, and highlight possible challenges and complications - and will so help to gather clinical evidence to provide better treatment for patients suffering from a long bone defect.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Skeletally mature
  • Post traumatic bone defect > 2 cm either
  • initially after injury or
  • after surgical debridement
  • Informed consent obtained, i.e.:
  • Ability to understand the content of the patient information/ICF
  • Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation according to the registry plan
  • Signed and dated EC/IRB approved written informed consent OR
  • Written consent provided according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures for patients who are not able to provide independent written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Any oblique defect that has less than 8cm expansion when adding the defect size of all four cortices
  • Any not medically managed severe systemic disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product registry within the previous 3 months that could influence the results of the present registry

Treatment and study plan

Any treatment that is used for a defect of any long bone

Procedure

Any treatment that is used for a defect of any long bone. All treatments are based on individual clinician's judgement and the patient characteristics. The registry does not dictate any specific treatment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline characteristics

    Time frame: Pre-operative

    Demographics, medical history, comorbidity

  2. Bone defect details

    Time frame: Pre-operative and/or intraoperative

    • Affected bone
    • Localization: Proximal 1/3rd, middle 3rd, distal 1/3rd(for any bone)
    • Size (categorization according Karger classification; definition: a bone defect should be at least 2 cm (Karger Type II)) Type II: 2-5 cm Type III: 5-10 cm Type IV: > 10 cm
  3. Trauma assessment

    Time frame: Pre-operative and/or intraoperative

    • Injury Severity Score (ISS): Grading for each item (points): No injury (0), Minor (1), Moderate (4), Serious (9), Severe (16), Critical (25), Unsurvivable (75)
    • Assessment:
    • Head and neck worst injury
    • Face worst injury
    • Chest worst injury
    • Abdomen worst injury
    • Extremity (including pelvis) worst injury
    • External worst injury
    • Gustilo & Anderson classification for open fractures
    • Type I
    • Type II
    • Type IIIA
    • Type IIIB
    • Type IIIC
    • Tscherne classification for closed fracture and soft-tissue injuries
    • Grade 0
    • Grade 1
    • Grade 2
    • Grade 3
  4. evaluate the bone defect in the context of previous interventions

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Number of previous interventions: <2, <4, >4

  5. Surgical details & Intraoperative findings 1

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    • Procedure type:
    • One stage
    • Staged (e.g. Masquelet technique / distraction osteogenesis / bone transport)
    • Ilizarov
    • Bone quality (good, fair, poor) by surgeon's discretion
    • Soft tissue and vascularity (good, fair, poor) by surgeon's discretion
    • Contamination (yes/no)

    Specification:

    • Metal from a bullet
    • Metal from a pole
    • Other Metal
    • Wood
    • Soil
    • Others
    • Surgical time (min)
    • Stabilization technique: Internal device (extra- or intramedullary) / External device (For both, drop down menu will be used)
  6. Surgical details & Intraoperative findings 2

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    • Bone grafting
    • Autografts
    • Allograft(s)
    • Other synthetics
    • If applicable - time to harvest graft (in minutes)
    • Graft enhancement yes / no
    • Demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
    • Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)
    • Stem cells
    • Platelet rich plasma (PRP)
    • Other
    • Soft-tissue / vascular / microsurgical procedure yes / no
    • Skin graft
    • Local flap
    • Free flap
    • Additional treatment
    • Systemic antibiotic treatment yes / no
    • Local antibiotic treatment yes / no
    • Post-operative use of a negative pressure dressings (NPWT) or vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system yes / no
  7. Functional Outcome

    Time frame: 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 12 months)

    • Assessment of limb function and loss of length
    • Definition: anatomic shortening of the limb in comparison to the contralateral side
    • Assessment in cm
    • Any orthotic used to equalize leg length
  8. Patient related outcome / Quality of life 1

    Time frame: Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    • Physical function: This item measures self-reported capability rather than actual performance. It includes the functioning of lower extremities (walking or mobility) as well as instrumental activities of daily living, such as running errands. We will use the short form 10b.
    • Physical function, upper extremity: This item measures activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. We will use the short form 7.
    • Pain Interference: This item assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. We will use the short form 8a.

    Short forms will be used in all sites possible (i.e. where the translation is available).

  9. Patient related outcome / Quality of life 2

    Time frame: Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

    EQ-5D-3L assessment (Five items, 3-point categorical scale) The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.

    o The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.

  10. Radiological Outcome

    Time frame: Screening / / Intraoperative / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

    Pre-operative/intraoperative

    • Deformity parameters (if applicable)
    • Nonunion classification: Hypertrophic, Oligotrophic, Atrophic Follow-up visits
    • Bone healing (based on the treating physician's judgement): Not healed / Partially healed / Mostly healed / Healed
    • Evaluation of the expansion of the bone defect: bone defect size
    • Time to healing: Date when full healing is achieved (to be calculated days from index surgery)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joelle Kägi

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 79 549 32 83

Marco Minoia

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 79 612 09 67

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AO Innovation Translation Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

An International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry to Investigate Treatment Options and Their Outcomes on Post-traumatic Long Bones Defects

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Oct 2, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.