Hospital-Based and Home-Based Resistance Training in Adult Congenital Heart Disease
NCT06680973
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT07613398
This project aims to evaluate a new cardiac MRI technique called the Free-Running Framework (FRF), which could simplify and accelerate the process of acquiring cardiac images. The investigators want to verify whether this method can provide functional heart measurements comparable to those obtained with traditional methods. More specifically, the goal of the study is to compare the measurements obtained with FRF to those obtained with standard sequences, to ensure they match and that this new approach can be reliably used in clinical practice. The FRF technique works differently from standard cardiac MRI. In standard exams, patients are asked to hold their breath several times and small electrodes (ECG) are used to monitor the heartbeat during the scan. These steps are needed to get clearer images of the heart as it moves. With FRF, these steps are no longer necessary: the scan is performed while patients' breath normally and without ECG monitoring. In addition, standard MRI takes multiple 2D slices of the heart, one after another. The FRF method instead captures a 3D image of the entire heart in one go, which can improve the consistency of the exam and reduce errors when doctors analyze the images later. This is all possible because the FRF method records data continuously and then organizes the images afterward based on how participants heart and breathing were moving during the exam. This helps the imager to get clear images of the heart, even without breath-holding or ECG monitoring. This project is aimed at individuals with heart disease who require cardiac MRI exams to monitor their health status (age ≥ 18 years) and are able to clearly understand the instructions provided by the research team. The investigators have already conducted small-scale technical and feasibility studies using FRF. These studies have shown that FRF is easy to use, faster than traditional methods, and provides image quality comparable to standard imaging techniques. The investigators now wish to evaluate its use in a clinical setting. More specifically, the investigators need to verify that FRF provides the same essential diagnostic information as standard techniques, so that it can be reliably used in future patient care. A maximum of 300 participants will be included in the investigation of this MRI technique between 2026 and 2031. This is a multi-center study, conducted internationally across 18 centers.
This project is being carried out in compliance with Swiss legislation. The investigators follow all internationally recognized guidelines. The competent ethics committee has reviewed and approved this project.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedAll sexes
Observational
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in industrialized nations. While a range of diagnostic tools exists for cardiovascular disease detection and monitoring, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the only modality that enables a safe, non-invasive assessment of the heart without exposure to ionizing radiation. MRI allows for a comprehensive evaluation of cardiac anatomy, function, myocardial tissue characterization, and blood flow quantification, making it a powerful tool for cardiovascular diagnostics.
Despite strong clinical evidence supporting its utility, cardiac MRI (CMR) remains underutilized, primarily due to the length and complexity of a traditional CMR exam. Several factors contribute to the length and complexity of a standard CMR exam. First, a standard CMR protocol relies heavily on two-dimensional (2D) image acquisitions, each requiring manual slice planning by an experienced technologist-a process that is both time consuming and highly dependent on operator expertise. Second, traditional image acquisition requires electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering to synchronize with the cardiac cycle, requiring additional setup and potentially introducing errors if the ECG signal is suboptimal. Finally, most conventional sequences rely on repeated patient breath-holding to minimize respiratory motion artifacts, which can be particularly challenging for individuals with severe cardiovascular disease, congenital anomalies, or limited compliance. Even for highly skilled personnel, this process is timeconsuming and inefficient. Consequently, a significant portion of the patient's time in the scanner is spent on preparation and planning rather than actual image acquisition, leading to prolonged exam durations and increased healthcare costs.
Given these challenges, there is a strong need for simplified, automated, and time-efficient CMR acquisitions. In response to this challenge, the investigators research group has developed an innovative "free-running framework" (FRF)-a set of MRI methods that continuously acquire threedimensional (3D) image data across the entire cardiac cycle and throughout free breathing, irrespective of cardiac or respiratory motion. Unlike conventional CMR sequences that require separate, prospectively planned acquisitions for each imaging plane and time point, FRF employs continuous, self-navigated data acquisition. This eliminates the need for complex slice planning and enables retrospective reconstruction of cardiac motion, ensuring that imaging is both standardized and independent of user expertise. By leveraging advanced motion-resolved reconstruction algorithms developed by the investigators group, the investigators can derive both cardiac and respiratory motion from a single dataset, providing a fully automated, 3D whole-heart imaging approach.
Once diagnosed, patients with cardiac diseases often require lifelong monitoring and repeated imaging assessments to guide treatment decisions and evaluate disease progression. This makes a non-ionizing imaging modality like CMR admirable. Nonetheless, the prolonged scan durations and intricate manual planning associated with traditional CMR limit its accessibility and practical feasibility. By eliminating the need for slice planning and reducing scan complexity, FRF has the potential to significantly improve imaging for cardiac disease patients by:
The feasibility of FRF has been demonstrated in experimental, pre-clinical, and small observational clinical studies, with no observed adverse effects. This study aims to evaluate its clinical feasibility and efficiency in real-world cardiac disease patients across multiple cardiac institutions, serving as a precursor for larger validation studies and eventual clinical implementation. This study will provide the first systematic clinical evaluation of 3D FRF across multiple cardiac institutions in cardiac disease patients, assessing both its technical feasibility and potential workflow benefits in a real-world setting. In particular, this study will:
If successful, this study will lay the groundwork for future multi-center validation clinical trial studies and eventual clinical integration, addressing a critical gap in CMR accessibility and efficiency.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
estimated with a two-sided 95% confidence interval within each pre-defined patient cohort. The study is designed to ensure that the half-width of this confidence interval does not exceed 1.25% LVEF per cohort.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Contrast ratio and endocardial-to-blood-pool interface sharpness between 5D FISS-FRF and conventional 2D cine.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Likert scale (0-4) consensus grading by ≥2 expert CMR readers blinded to images from both techniques.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Percentage of non-diagnostic or excluded scans.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Extent of volumetric coverage of the entire heart and related great vessels.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Presence of additional diagnostic insights from respiratory motion tracking of FRF.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
o Exploratory analyses will assess whether observed agreement metrics are compatible with commonly used clinical acceptability thresholds (e.g., ±5% LVEF). These analyses are hypothesis-generating and intended to inform future confirmatory studies.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Comparison between 5D FISS-FRF and 2D conventional cine
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
assessed using a 4-point likert scale per AHA segment (normal, hypokinesia, akinesia, dyskinesia)
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
maximum and minimum volumes and total atrial emptying fraction derived from conventional 2D cine long-axis views compared to 5D FISS-FRF
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Agreement of automatically post-processed ventricular ejection fraction measurements (LVEF, RVEF) derived from 5D FISS-FRF with (1) standard post-processing of 5D FISS-FRF and (2) standard post-processing of conventional 2D cine cardiac MRI. Agreement will be assessed using appropriate statistical metrics.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Agreement of automatically post-processed ventricular function metrics (LVEDV, LVESV, LVSV, RVEDV, RVESV, RVSV) derived from 5D FISS-FRF with (1) standard post-processing of 5D FISS-FRF and (2) standard post-processing of conventional 2D cine cardiac MRI. Agreement will be assessed using appropriate statistical metrics.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Percentage of reconstructed datasets that are considered clinically usable based on predefined quality criteria.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Comparison of reconstruction time between AI-based reconstruction and standard compressed sensing methods.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Comparison of left and right ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF) between AI-based and standard reconstructions.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Comparison of left and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and stroke volume (SV) between AI-based and standard reconstructions.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Comparison of left ventricular mass between AI-based and standard reconstructions.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Image similarity assessed using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and root mean squared error (RMSE).
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Contrast ratio and endocardial-to-blood-pool interface sharpness between reconstruction methods.
Time frame: Baseline (during study MRI acquisition)
Likert scale (0-4) consensus grading by ≥2 expert CMR readers blinded to images from both reconstruction methods.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Katerina Eyre, PhD
CONTACT
Matthias Stuber, PhD
CONTACT
Matthias Stuber
Other
Assessment and Validation of the Established Free-Running Framework for Cardiac Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FAST-CMR): An International Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor Study at 1.5T
Acronym: FAST-CMR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06680973
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03005626
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02542683
Behavior, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01619982
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details