Visant Medical Canalicular Plug
DevicePlug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
NCT Number: NCT04817085
This study is designed to evaluate the clinical utility and safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug compared to a commercially available canalicular plug.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Schwartz Laser Eye Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility and safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug compared to a commercially available canalicular plug over 6 months of subject follow-up.
Study subjects who are eligible for enrollment and have provided written informed consent will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (i.e., 2 subjects randomized to the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug for every 1 subject randomized to a commercially available canalicular plug). All study subjects will be treated bilaterally with plugs placed in the inferior canaliculi.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months
Time frame: 3 months
Non-inferiority hypothesis. Higher Score using this continuous variable equates to larger tear film
Time frame: 3 months
Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.
Time frame: Month 3
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Larger measurement equates to larger tear film.
Time frame: Month 3
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.
Time frame: Month 3
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Scale is 0-15. More staining is associated with more severe dry eye.
Time frame: Month 6
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Larger measurement equates to larger tear film.
Time frame: Month 6
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.
Time frame: Month 6
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Scale is 0-15. More staining is associated with more severe dry eye.
Time frame: Month 3
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Increased time equates to more stable tear film
Time frame: Month 6
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Higher Score using this continuous variable equates to larger tear film
Time frame: Month 6
Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Increased time equates to more stable tear film
Visant Medical, Inc.
Industry
Prospective Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Clinical Utility and Safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Device in Subjects Who Are Candidates for Occlusion With Punctal or Canalicular Plugs
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07089511
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06346340
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Laguna Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07675460
Acne Cystic, Choroidal Thickness
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04418999
Allergy, Corneal Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details