Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04817085

An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility and Safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug

This study is designed to evaluate the clinical utility and safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug compared to a commercially available canalicular plug.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Schwartz Laser Eye Center, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility and safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug compared to a commercially available canalicular plug over 6 months of subject follow-up.

Study subjects who are eligible for enrollment and have provided written informed consent will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (i.e., 2 subjects randomized to the Visant Medical Canalicular Plug for every 1 subject randomized to a commercially available canalicular plug). All study subjects will be treated bilaterally with plugs placed in the inferior canaliculi.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Twenty-two (22) years of age or older
  • BCDVA of 20/40 or better in each eye
  • Both eyes with a baseline Schirmer's test with anesthetic ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes
  • Presence of corneal staining in both eyes in any of the 5 areas defined by the NEI/Industry Workshop Scale
  • Baseline OSDI score of at least 23 with no more than 3 responses of "not applicable"
  • Patent bilateral lacrimal drainage system as demonstrated by punctal irrigation
  • If female, subject must be post-menopausal, medically sterile (e.g hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy) or have negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) on Day 0 of the study and agree to utilize a medically acceptable form of contraception over the course of the study
  • Willing and able to sign informed consent and HIPAA authorization, follow study instructions, and complete all study visits.

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of ophthalmic cyclosporine (Restasis) within 6 months or lifitegrast (Xiidra) within 3 months prior to Day 0 in either eye
  • History of surgical punctal occlusion (e.g., cautery), canalicular infection or canalicular surgery in either eye
  • Corneal transplant in either eye
  • Ocular surgery (such as cataract surgery or LASIK) in either eye within six months of the Baseline Visit
  • A systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study (e.g. current systemic infection, uncontrolled autoimmune disease, uncontrolled immunodeficiency disease)
  • The history or presence of any ocular disorder or condition in either eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the interpretation of the study results (e.g., significant corneal or conjunctival scarring, pterygium or nodular pinguecula; current ocular infection (except mild blepharitis), conjunctivitis or inflammation not associated with dry eye; anterior (epithelial) basement membrane corneal dystrophy or other clinically significant corneal dystrophy or degeneration; history of ocular herpetic infection; evidence of keratoconus; lid or lacrimal cancer
  • Active severe systemic allergy, seasonal allergies, rhinitis or sinusitis requiring treatment (i.e., antihistamines, decongestants, oral or aerosol steroids)
  • Use of steroids, including administration by systemic or topical ocular routes (dermatologic steroids not applied to the eyelids and inhaled steroids are allowed)
  • Participation in a clinical trial during the past 30 days
  • Women who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or nursing at study entry

Treatment and study plan

Visant Medical Canalicular Plug

Device

Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months

Commercially available canalicular plug

Device

Plug is inserted into the inferior canaliculi and assessed for 6 months

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Schirmer's score from baseline to Month 3 compared to commercially available plug

    Time frame: 3 months

    Non-inferiority hypothesis. Higher Score using this continuous variable equates to larger tear film

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of responders achieving improvement from Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score by a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID).

    Time frame: 3 months

    Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.

  2. Mean change in tear meniscus height from baseline

    Time frame: Month 3

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Larger measurement equates to larger tear film.

  3. Mean change in OSDI score from baseline

    Time frame: Month 3

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.

  4. Mean change in corneal staining score from baseline (NEI workshop scale)

    Time frame: Month 3

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Scale is 0-15. More staining is associated with more severe dry eye.

  5. Mean change in tear meniscus height from baseline

    Time frame: Month 6

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Larger measurement equates to larger tear film.

  6. Mean change in OSDI score from baseline

    Time frame: Month 6

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Non-inferiority hypothesis. Scale of 0-100. Lower OSDI score means fewer symptoms.

  7. Mean change in corneal staining score from baseline (NEI workshop scale)

    Time frame: Month 6

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Scale is 0-15. More staining is associated with more severe dry eye.

  8. Mean change in tear break up time from baseline

    Time frame: Month 3

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Increased time equates to more stable tear film

  9. Mean change in Schirmer score from baseline

    Time frame: Month 6

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Higher Score using this continuous variable equates to larger tear film

  10. Mean change in tear break up time from baseline

    Time frame: Month 6

    Null hypothesis of no improvement from baseline. Increased time equates to more stable tear film

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Visant Medical, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Clinical Utility and Safety of the Visant Medical Canalicular Device in Subjects Who Are Candidates for Occlusion With Punctal or Canalicular Plugs

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 25, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 6, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.