Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06012383

Alvocade® (Bortezomib) Safety and Effectiveness Study

This study is a phase IV, post-marketing, observational, cohort study for safety and effectiveness evaluation of Alvocade® use in Iranian patients with multiple myeloma. No control groups were considered in the study design. The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This study is a phase IV, post-marketing, observational, cohort study for safety and effectiveness evaluation of Alvocade® use in Iranian patients with multiple myeloma. Data were gathered in two booklets, containing information on sixteen injections, which were filled by the designated physician.

Exposure to Alvocade® in this study was defined as administration of bortezomib (Alvocade®, NanoAlvand) with a dose of 1.3 mg/m2, once every 3 weeks during 2.5 to 5.5 months (16 injections).

The primary objective of this study was safety assessment, including the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

This study was single arm and the sample size of this study was 59 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with multiple myeloma were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • There were no exclusion criteria for this study.

Treatment and study plan

bortezomib

Drug

Alvocade® was given with a dose of 1.3 mg/m2.

Other names: Alvocade®

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety Assessment

    Time frame: up to 6 months

    Safety assessment, including the incidence of AEs. All AEs were classified based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA Desktop Browser 4.0 Beta) terms as System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). All the reported events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). Moreover, seriousness of AEs was assessed according to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH-E2B) guidelines. The causality relation was assessed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness Assessment

    Time frame: up to 6 months

    Response categories (Stable Disease (SD), Partial Response (PR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Complete Response (CR), and stringent Complete Response (sCR)) were defined and reported based on the uniform response criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NanoAlvand

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase IV, Post Marketing, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study to Investigate Safety and Effectiveness of Alvocade® in Iranian Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 25, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 25, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.