VUMedicalCenter
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05555329
Pomalidomide either as single therapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide, elotuzumab, bortezomib, or daratumumab are effective treatment regimens in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Standard dosing is 4 mg/day during 21 days of a 28-day cycle (21/28). However, a clear dose-response association for pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is lacking. There is data supporting that a dose of 2 mg/day continuously (28/28) induces fewer side effects while efficacy is preserved, compared to 4 mg/day continuously. The response in patients who received pomalidomide 2 mg per day compared to 4 mg per day was higher, with a longer duration of response. In addition, a randomized phase II study showed no difference in efficacy between 4 mg (21/28) and 4 mg continuously. These clinical studies support that a dosage of pomalidomide of 2 mg (28/28) is at least comparable with a dosage of 4 mg (21/28). It is not known if 4 mg every other day (EOD) is comparable to a dosage of pomalidomide 2 mg (28/28) or 4 mg every day (QD, 21/28). For cost reasons, this is interesting as the costs of pomalidomide 4 mg and 2 mg are comparable. Therefore, from a patient and societal perspective, the investigators want to explore if an alternative scheme would be possible by performing a PKPD bio-equivalence pilot study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Pomalidomide either as single therapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide, elotuzumab, bortezomib, or daratumumab are effective treatment regimens in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Standard dosing is 4 mg/day during 21 days of a 28-day cycle (21/28). However, a clear dose-response association for pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is lacking. There is data supporting that a dose of 2 mg/day continuously (28/28) induces fewer side effects while efficacy is preserved, compared to 4 mg/day continuously. The response in patients who received pomalidomide 2 mg per day compared to 4 mg per day was higher, with a longer duration of response. In addition, a randomized phase II study showed no difference in efficacy between 4 mg (21/28) and 4 mg continuously. These clinical studies support that a dosage of pomalidomide of 2 mg (28/28) is at least comparable with a dosage of 4 mg (21/28). It is not known if 4 mg every other day (EOD) is comparable to a dosage of pomalidomide 2 mg (28/28) or 4 mg every day (QD, 21/28). For cost reasons, this is interesting as the costs of pomalidomide 4 mg and 2 mg are comparable. Therefore, from a patient and societal perspective, the investigators want to explore if an alternative scheme would be possible by performing a PKPD bio-equivalence pilot study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pomalidomide 4 mg every day, on days 1-21 in a cycle of 28 days
Other names: Cycle 1
Pomalidomide 4 mg every other day, on days 1-21 in a cycle of 28 days
Other names: Cycle 2 (Group A)
Pomalidomide 2 mg every day, on days 1-28 in a cycle of 28 days
Other names: Cycle 2 (Group B)
Pomalidomide 2 mg every day, on days 1-28 in a cycle of 28 days
Other names: Cycle 3 (Group A)
Pomalidomide 4 mg every other day, on days 1-21 in a cycle of 28 days
Other names: Cycle 3 (Group B)
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
The AUC/MIC ratio during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg QD on day 1-21, 4 mg EOD on day 1-21, and 2 mg QD on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
The level of the Ctrough during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg QD on day 1-21, 4 mg EOD on day 1-21, and 2 mg QD on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
The Cmax during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg QD on day 1-21, 4 mg EOD on day 1- 21, and 2 mg QD on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
The time above the EC50 during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg QD on day 1-21, 4 mg EOD on day 1- 21, and 2 mg QD on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
Toxicity and side effects during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg every day on day 1-21, pomalidomide 4 mg every other day on day 1-21, and pomalidomide 2 mg every day on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
Overall response rate (ORR), based on the IMWG criteria
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
T-cell activation, defined as the expression of membrane activation markers and cytokine markers during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg every day on day 1-21, pomalidomide 4 mg every other day on day 1-21, and pomalidomide 2 mg every day on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
Ikaros/Aiolos degradation as a biological measurement of pomalidomide activation during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg every day on day 1-21, pomalidomide 4 mg every other day on day 1-21, and pomalidomide 2 mg every day on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Time frame: During three cycles of 28 days
Concentration of pomalidomide in PBMCs during usage of pomalidomide 4 mg every day on day 1-21, pomalidomide 4 mg every other day on day 1-21, and pomalidomide 2 mg every day on day 1-28 in cycles of 28 days.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Other
Alternative Dosing Scheme of Pomalidomide 4 mg Every Other Day Versus Pomalidomide 2 mg and 4 mg Every Day: Reduction in Costs, Same Efficacy? A PKPD Bioequivalence Pilot Study; the POMAlternative Study
Acronym: POMAlternative
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07200089
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06485076
Aggressive Lymphoma, B Cell Lymphoma
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07248176
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05673083
Behavior, Blood Protein Disorders
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details