Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05578833

Algorithm for Cervix Carcinoma Screening in CZ Using the Detection of HPV DNA and CINtec Plus

Cervix carcinoma has been a serious, long-term issue in the Czech Republic. The cause of nearly all cervix carcinomas is human papilomavirus (HPV). Hence the detection of the HPV genome is a more prospective screening tool with higher sensitivity than a cytological swab. As shown by comparative studies, the sensitivity of the HPV DNA test in the detection of severe pre-cancer is 35% higher on average when compared to the cytological test.

The study repeatedly determined the presence of the HPV genome, including the prevalence of selected HPV genotypes (16, 18 and other hrHPV) and conventional cytology. The relative sensitivity of the two methods was specified. In the course of the prospective follow-up, the incidence of pre-cancers and invasive tumours in the study population were specified.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Cervix carcinoma has been a serious, long-term issue in the Czech Republic. About 1,000 new cases are diagnosed every year and about 400 female patients die as a result of the disease. More than 20,000 women in the Czech Republic live with a history of cervix carcinoma therapy and the potential risk of its recurrence. Although the past years have been marked with effective organisational changes in cervix carcinoma screening thanks to which a decreasing trend of its incidence can be observed, there is a lack of substantial impact on the occurrence of advanced stages of the disease and mortality. Similar data have also been reported internationally: foreign authors analysed cases of patients with a malignant cervix tumour. They reported that 24 - 32% of females with a diagnosed malignant tumour had periodically undergone cytological screening. The reason is that the sensitivity of an individual cytological examination for detecting severe pre-cancer is limited, ranging between 40 - 75% and only increasing with repeated examinations. The negative predictive value of the cytological swab is additionally limited and reaches 0.78% in recent studies over a three-year screening interval.

The cause of nearly all cervix carcinomas is human papilomavirus (HPV). Hence the detection of the HPV genome is a more prospective screening tool with higher sensitivity than a cytological swab. The sensitivity of the validated HPV DNA test using PCR method reaches 94.5% for detecting severe pre-cancer (confidence interval 94.2 - 96.9%). As shown by comparative studies, the sensitivity of the HPV DNA test for the detection of severe pre-cancer is 35% higher on average when compared to the cytological test. The HPV DNA test in addition shows a significantly better negative three-year predictive value (0.34%) and the low value continues for at least another five years. The lower specificity of the HPV DNA test can be compensated by selective genotype specification with proof of the most frequent oncogenic genotypes HPV 16 and HPV 18. This promising procedure, validated by large multicentric randomised studies and introduced to clinical practice in several European countries, primarily uses the detection of HPV DNA.

The study repeatedly determined the presence of the HPV genome, including the prevalence of selected HPV genotypes (16, 18 and other hrHPV) and conventional cytology. The relative sensitivity of the two methods was specified. In the course of the prospective follow-up, the incidence of pre-cancers and invasive tumours in the study population were specified.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent signature
  • Age 30 - 60
  • Screening (not reviewing after previous abnormal cytological finding)
  • Sampling of gravid women possible

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to take part

Treatment and study plan

HPV DNA test with selective HPV 16/18 genotyping (cobas® 4800 HPV Test, Roche)

Diagnostic Test

The enrolled patients underwent standard conventional cytology plus a test for the detection of high-risk human papilomavirus (hrHPV) with selective genotype specification (HPV 16, 18 and other hrHPV) - combined screening. In defined cases of positive hrHPV, the patient underwent reflexive examination by CINtec plus technology.

After the initial combined screening the patients continued in the standard Czech screening practice (annual conventional cytology) or be treated according to the particular finding of the initial episode. For three years, the incidence of pre-cancers and invasive cervix carcinomas were monitored and data were entered into an electronic register.

The second combined screening episode followed in year 3. An evaluation of its results immediately followed.

p16 and Ki-67 biomarker detection in the form of dual cytological staining (CINtec Plus, Roche)

Diagnostic Test

The enrolled patients underwent standard conventional cytology plus a test for the detection of high-risk human papilomavirus (hrHPV) with selective genotype specification (HPV 16, 18 and other hrHPV) - combined screening. In defined cases of positive hrHPV, the patient underwent reflexive examination by CINtec plus technology.

After the initial combined screening the patients continued in the standard Czech screening practice (annual conventional cytology) or be treated according to the particular finding of the initial episode. For three years, the incidence of pre-cancers and invasive cervix carcinomas were monitored and data were entered into an electronic register.

The second combined screening episode followed in year 3. An evaluation of its results immediately followed.

standard conventional cytology PAP test

Diagnostic Test

The enrolled patients underwent standard conventional cytology plus a test for the detection of high-risk human papilomavirus (hrHPV) with selective genotype specification (HPV 16, 18 and other hrHPV) - combined screening. In defined cases of positive hrHPV, the patient underwent reflexive examination by CINtec plus technology.

After the initial combined screening the patients continued in the standard Czech screening practice (annual conventional cytology) or be treated according to the particular finding of the initial episode. For three years, the incidence of pre-cancers and invasive cervix carcinomas were monitored and data were entered into an electronic register.

The second combined screening episode followed in year 3. An evaluation of its results immediately followed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of hrHPV positivity in the Czech population

    Time frame: 49 months

    The ratio of patients with a positive HPV test in the first combined screening episode and the number of examined women.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Specification of prevalence of selected hrHPV genotypes

    Time frame: 49 months

    Representation of individual hrHPV genotypes in the first and the second screening episode in all examined women and in all HPV positive women.

  2. Detection level of pre-cancers and invasive carcinomas in the first combined screening episode (indicator of relative sensitivity of the two methods)

    Time frame: 49 months

    The ratio of detected diseases and the number of examined women in the first screening episode, a secondary endpoint.

  3. Incidence of pre-cancers and invasive carcinomas in the course of the follow-up

    Time frame: 49 months

    The cumulative incidence of diseases considering the censored patients, a secondary endpoint.

  4. Incidence of pre-cancers and invasive carcinomas after the second screening episode

    Time frame: 49 months

    The cumulative incidence of the disease in patients based on the initial HPV test results and initial cytology results.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AeskuLab Pathology Prague

Other

Collaborators

  • Institute of Biostatistics and analyses, Ltd.

Registry information

Official study title

Algorithm for Cervix Carcinoma Screening in the Czech Republic Using the Detection of HPV DNA With Selective HPV 16/18 Genotype and Special CINtec Plus Cytological Colouring

Acronym: LIBUSE

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 13, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.