Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04453683

Airway Management in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Comparison of Intubating Laryngeal Mask Fastrack and Air Q as a Conduit for Fiberoptic Intubation

To compare air Q versus ILMA intubation in obese adult paralyzed patient

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Zagazig University

Zagazig, 002055, Egypt

About this study

Evaluate the process of endo-tracheal intubation through Air Q compared to through ILMA regarding number and duration of attempts, laryngeal view grade, time to removal of device over tube without dislodgement and any complication

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All morbidly obese patient defined as BMI >40 kg/m2 scheduled for an elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were enrolled on the day of their surgery.

ASA physical status (I-II)

Exclusion criteria

physical status of IV or V or had a history of impossible tracheal intubation or awake fibreoptic intubation or if preoperative evaluation showed limited mouth aperture <3.5 cm or showed evidence that an awake fiberoptic intubation or rapid sequence induction would be required patients at increased risk for aspiration of gastric contents, coagulopathy or those with unstable cervical spines or requiring nasal route for tracheal intubation

-

Treatment and study plan

Air-Q. ILA insertion of proper size

Device

Success of fiberoptic guided intubation throuhgh Air Q supraglottic airway device

ILMA insertion of proper size

Device

Success of fiberoptic guided intubation throuhgh ILMA supraglottic airway device

Primary outcomes

  1. success rate of tracheal intubation through each device.

    Time frame: Within a maximum of 5 minutes to confirm success of tracheal intubation through each supraglottic airway devices

    success rate of tracheal intubation through each device is defined as end tidal carbon dioxide confirmed placement of TT within a maximum of 5 min tracheal intubation time

Secondary outcomes

  1. Insertion time of supraglottic airway devices

    Time frame: It is about 13-19 second for insertion of supraglottic airway devices

    Time necessary for insertion was measured from the time the face mask was taken away until the appearance of Co2 on the capnograph while supraglottic airway device in place

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University

Other Gov

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 1, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 4, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.