ADYNOVATE
BiologicalAntihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated
Other names: BAX 855, BAX855, Recombinant Factor VIII (FVIII) PEGylated
NCT Number: NCT03169972
The purpose of this survey is to understand the following items in the actual clinical use of ADYNOVATE in patients:
1. Unexpected adverse drug reactions 2. Occurrence of adverse drug reactions in the actual clinical use 3. Factors that may affect safety and efficacy 4. Occurrence of Factor VIII inhibitor development in patients with coagulation factor VIII deficiency (hereinafter hemophilia A) 5. Safety and efficacy for hemophilia A patients who received routine prophylactic therapy and on-demand therapy
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Nagoya City, Japan, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated
Other names: BAX 855, BAX855, Recombinant Factor VIII (FVIII) PEGylated
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Number of previously treated patients (PTPs) and previously untreated patients (PUPs) who discontinued the use of ADYNOVATE were reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Annual bleed rate (ABR) of spontaneous bleeding episodes in PTPs and PUPs on a prophylaxis regimen were reported. Annual bleed rate is calculated by the number of bleeding episodes observed during administration period divided by the duration of administration period, after that multiplied with 365.2425.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Annual bleed rate (ABR) of breakthrough bleeding episodes in PTPs and PUPs on a prophylaxis regimen were reported. Annual bleed rate is calculated by the number of bleeding episodes observed during administration period divided by the duration of administration period, after that multiplied with 365.2425.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs.
Duration of treatment of study drug on a prophylaxis regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Duration of treatment of study drug on an on-demand regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Dose per administration of study drug on a prophylaxis regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Dose per administration of study drug on an on-demand regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Number of doses per a bleeding episode of study drug on an on-demand regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Percentage of each category of hemostatic effectiveness for treatment of breakthrough bleeding episodes in a prophylaxis regimen assessed by the investigator was reported. Hemostatic effectiveness was assessed by the investigator with following 4-point ordinal scale: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Percentage of each category of hemostatic effectiveness for an on-demand regimen assessed by the investigator was reported. Hemostatic effectiveness was assessed by the investigator with following 4-point ordinal scale: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Number of doses per a week of study drug on a prophylaxis regimen was reported.
Time frame: Throughout the study participation period: 1 year for previously treated patients for PTPs and 2 years for previously untreated patients for PUPs
Number of PTPs and PUPs who experienced factor VIII inhibition, dermatitis atopic or eczema as an AE related to development of inhibitors, shock or anaphylaxis was reported.
Takeda
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05147662
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06579144
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited
Sofia, Bulgaria
View Trial DetailsNCT03315455
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04158648
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details