UAB Highlands Hospital/Department of Family and Community Medicine
Birmingham, Alabama, 35223, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07032844
The purpose of the study is to compare 2 primary care based telehealth interventions- 1) digital health coaching and 2) remote patient monitoring for improving glycemic (blood sugar levels) control and overall health outcomes in individuals with physical disabilities, type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and at least one chronic condition. The project aims to determine which intervention is more effective in reducing blood sugar levels, improving patient-reported outcomes such as diabetes-related distress, and facilitating the implementation of these approaches in real-world primary care settings serving vulnerable populations. The findings intend to inform about optimal telehealth strategies for managing multiple chronic conditions in underserved groups, there by supporting improved health equity and quality of care.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham, Alabama, 35223, United States
Location status: Recruiting
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines chronic diseases as conditions that last one year or more and require ongoing medical attention, limit activities of daily living, or both. Six in 10 adults in the U.S. are reported to have at least one chronic condition, while four in 10 adults in the U.S. are reported to have two or more chronic conditions.T2DM is one of the chronic conditions in the U.S. population that has been gradually increasing over the years. Over 34.2 million U.S. adults are affected by diabetes mellitus (DM); T2DM accounts for 90-95% of these.T2DM is often associated with other cardiometabolic diseases such as hypertension and obesity.T2DM is one of the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which are among the leading causes of death in the U.S. T2DM also results in physical disability because of complications such as leg amputation and vision loss.
Individuals with physical disabilities face a disproportionate burden of T2DM and related chronic conditions, exacerbated by suboptimal social determinants of health (SDoH) such as reduced healthcare access and economic inequities.In general, 50-60% of disparities in T2DM outcomes can be attributed to social determinants of health (SDoH). SDoH are defined as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. Physical disability has an intimate relationship with SDoH such as race/ethnicity, sex, socioeconomic status, geographic location, access to and quality of healthcare, etc. Transformation from the status of able-bodied person to the status of disability leads to a disparity and decline in SDoH of these individuals in terms of geographic location, healthcare access, transportation, economic support, food security, and so on.
Teleheath interventions, including digital health coaching (DHC) and remote patient monitoring(RPM), have emerged as promising strategies to address these disaprtiites, improve glycemic control, and overcome barriers to care. Developing an optimal, interdisciplinary primary care delivery model incorporating digital health coaching or RPM may play a crucial role in overcoming the obstacle of suboptimal patient-physician communication by enhancing both physician and patient satisfaction and improving population health. Both digital health coaching and RPM address SDoH, are being implemented by health systems, and show evidence of effectiveness through trials as well as real-world effectiveness.
However, there exists a clear evidence gap about which of these two interventions are superior and will best optimize population health outcomes. Further, there is an evidence gap about how these telehealth interventions may help people with physical disabilities and multiple chronic conditions and affect their long-term outcomes. The project design addresses this critical gaps identified in earlier research. While both interventions (RPM and DHC) show promise individually, no direct comparisons exist in populations with physical disabilities- a group disproportionally affteced by diabtese and access barriers. Previous studies often excluded this demographic or focused on single chronic conditions, despite evidence that multimorbidity complicates self-management. Aditionally, implementation science gaps presists regarding workflow integration in real-world primary car settings serving vulnerable groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This program will be developed using existing, evidence-based curricula for chronic disease self-management. Prior to initiating health coaching with participants, coaches will review data collected related to SDoH to further tailor the intervention as appropriate for housing stability, access to food and transportation, and interpersonal safety. All coaches will have access to participants' EMRs such that they can view medical information throughout the intervention. Coaches will be trained using a curriculum developed by Family and Community Medicine's inter-professional care team and our partners at NCHPAD, making the coaching inclusive of people with physical disabilities, such that the coaches are proficient in motivating behavior change related to resilience, physical activity, nutrition, mindfulness, and relationship-building, among others.
This comparator arm consists of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with periodic teleconsult visits over 6 months, delivered by trained pharmacists, RDs, or nurses, with devices shipped centrally to participants' homes. Sensors are replaced per manufacturer guidelines. During onboarding, participants receive device education and standardized safety counseling on recognizing and managing hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL; severe <54 mg/dL) and hyperglycemia (>300 mg/dL), including when to seek urgent or emergency care. During each teleconsult, the CGM team reviews Time in Range, Time Above Range, and Time Below Range, identifies patterns between glucose and lifestyle factors, and supports goal setting and medication adjustments as needed. Participants with repeated missed readings are contacted by the study team to troubleshoot adherence barriers.
In this arm, participants receive an integrated approach to diabetes management combining both digital health coaching and CGM-teleconsults, added in response to stakeholder and reviewer feedback expressing interest in benefiting from both interventions. Health coaches and CGM-trained team members work collaboratively to help participants set realistic goals and reinforce lifestyle strategies: the health coach evaluates the participant's food choices in relation to blood sugar patterns, while the CGM team reinforces the nutrition and physical activity recommendations set by the health coach during CGM teleconsults. Information flows bidirectionally - the CGM team informs the health coach of areas needing more emphasis, and the health coach flags participants who may need closer monitoring - so that each participant's care remains cohesive and adaptive to their glucose data and behavioral progress together.
Time frame: 12 months
Our primary aim 1 compares the average treatment effectiveness of a six-month RPM, digital health coaching, and combination digital health coaching and RPM program through a multi-site pragmatic randomized trial design. Our primary outcome is reduction in HbA1c at 12 months. Investigators hypothesize that the combination arm will result in superior improvements in HbA1c compared to either intervention alone, aligning with preliminary stakeholder engagement suggesting patient-centered preference for this combined approach.
Time frame: 12 months
Investigators hypothesize that the combination arm will result in more significant improvements in diabetes distress compared to either the remote patient monitoring (RPM) or digital health coaching alone.
Time frame: 12 months
To conduct pre-specified and exploratory predictive modeling that explains the heterogeneity in treatment effects and helps us understand for whom either of these interventions is more effective.
Time frame: 12 months
A convergent, mixed methods approach rooted in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to assess the multifaceted, multilevel relationships among context, intervention implementation processes, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes of the intervention will be evaluated by the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Aseel El Zein, PhD
CONTACT
Rebecca Rogers, MS
CONTACT
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
Comparing the Effectiveness of Primary Care Delivered Telehealth Interventions to Manage Type 2 Diabetes in People With Physical Disabilities and Multiple Chronic Conditions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07272837
Body Weight, Diabetes
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07167004
Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07307235
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06814184
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details