Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01481168

Adenosine Testing to DEtermine the Need for Pacing Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the intravenous adenosine test readily identifies patients with unexplained syncope who would benefit from permanent pacemaker implantation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Feeeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The investigation of syncope (transient loss of consciousness with loss of postural tone, collapse and spontaneous recovery) varies widely, is often lengthy and frequently expensive. The intravenous adenosine test has been used in the investigation of syncope and is cheap, safe and free of serious side effects. However, it is unclear what diagnosis the test unearths. There is some evidence that the test readily identifies bradycardia pacing indications.

In this study we plan to perform the adenosine test and implant a pacemaker should the test be positive. In half of the patients we will turn the pacemaker "on" and in the other half the pacemaker "off". The groups will swap over after six months. During this time we will assess the number of syncopal episodes. Also, in those who have a negative adenosine test we will implant a loop recorder to try to discover the cause of syncope.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Episode of syncope
  • Patient has provided written informed consent for participation in the study prior to any study specific procedures
  • Male or female
  • Age > 40 years
  • No cause of syncope clearly identified on clinical examination, lying and standing blood pressure measurements and standard 12 lead ECG.

Exclusion criteria

  • Asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Severe coronary disease (myocardial infarction within 3 months, known coronary stenosis >70%, NYHA heart failure or angina symptoms Class III or IV)
  • Known severe cerebrovascular disease or known significant internal carotid artery stenosis (>70%)
  • Prolonged corrected QT interval
  • Unablated accessory pathway
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Use of dipyridamole or any rate-limiting medication that cannot be safely discontinued
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac transplantation
  • Concurrent participation in another investigational study or trial
  • Inability to give informed consent; carer/proxy assent will be allowed in this study
  • Cause of syncope established from initial clinical history and examination, lying and standing blood pressure and ECG

Treatment and study plan

Pacemaker implantation (Medtronic)

Device

DDD+/-R pacing

Other names: Medtronic DDD+/-R pacemakers

Implantable Loop Recorder (Medtronic)

Device

Loop recorder implantation

Other names: Medtronic Reveal DX or XT

Primary outcomes

  1. Syncope Burden

    Time frame: 12 months

    Syncope Burden as measured by number of syncopal episodes and recorded by weekly postal patient diaries with telephone reminders to ensure adequate return

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first syncope

    Time frame: 12 months

    Time to first syncope

  2. Number of patients with recurrent syncope

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of patients with >1 episodes of syncope

  3. Quality of life

    Time frame: 12 months

    Quality of life as measured via the condition-specific instrument the Impact of Syncope on Quality of Life questionnaire with general health-related quality of life measured via the WHOQoL-Brief and WHOQoL-Old instruments

  4. Health economic analysis

    Time frame: 12 months

    Costs and benefits of the intervention to health and social services. (i) Use of EQ-5D questionnaire to establish the cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) (ii) The analysis will include the patients described above as well as a historical comparator group of consecutive patients derived from the database held by the Falls and Syncope Service who have not undergone adenosine testing. This group is particularly important to establish the utility of adenosine testing in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope.

  5. ECG diagnosis on ILR following syncopal episode in adenosine negative group

    Time frame: 12 months

    ECG diagnosis on ILR following syncopal episode in intravenous adenosine test negative group

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Adenosine Testing to DEtermine the Need for Pacing Therapy With the Additional Use of an Implantable Loop Recorder (ADEPT-ILR Study). The Efficacy of Permanent Pacing in Patients With Syncope and a Positive Intravenous Adenosine Test: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Trial.

Acronym: ADEPT-ILR

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 29, 2011
Registry last updated
Nov 20, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.