National Clinical Research Center, Korean Medicine Hospital, Pusan National University
Yangsan, Kyungsangnamdo, 626-770, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT01987622
Acupuncture is widely used to manage chronic low back pain. Mounting evidence suggests the beneficial effects of acupuncture for mitigating chronic low back pain with acceptable minor adverse events. However, little information exists regarding the effects and safety of acupuncture for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, one of the spinal disorders that present chronic low back and leg pain.
The investigators aimed to assess the overall effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of acupuncture in combination with usual care (as opposed to usual care alone) for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
The hypotheses of this study are as follows:
1. A set of acupuncture sessions in combination with usual care can provide greater functional improvements than usual care alone . 2. A set of acupuncture sessions in combination with usual care can provide greater pain reduction than usual care alone .
The study aims to include 50 participants (25 in the acupuncture group and 25 in the usual care group).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Yangsan, Kyungsangnamdo, 626-770, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patients in this group will receive individualized acupuncture prescribed by a certified Korean Medicine Doctor (KMD) with at least three years of clinical experience. The acupuncture formulas will be determined based on the individual patient's symptoms and at the KMD's discretion. The acupuncture treatment will be applied one to three times a week for six weeks (a total of 12 sessions and an additional four sessions are allowed). Acupuncture will be manually stimulated at first, and then electrical stimulation will be allowed at the KMD's discretion. Retention time will be equal to or less than 20 minutes. Examples of acupuncture points to be used might include LI4, LI11, TE5, SI3, TE3, ST36, SP6, SP9, LR3, GB34, Gb39, BL40, BL57, EX-B2, and BL23.
Usual care consists of patient education for a healthier lifestyle, including diet, exercise, self-management of symptoms, and the use of other treatments as needed. Participants will receive a three-page leaflet of patient education material. Optional regular physical therapies, including interferential current therapy (ICT) and local heat application, will be provided only for the control group at the participants' request . Physical therapy will be provided one to three times a week for six weeks (a total of 12 sessions and an additional four sessions are allowed). All kinds of conservative interventions for lumbar spinal stenosis, including analgesics and non-study physical treatments,will be allowed. However, surgical treatments, non-study acupuncture, or herbal medicine will not be allowed.
Time frame: 3 months
Participant-perceived reduction of pain and physical function will be measured with a 10-item questionnaire; change from baseline in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of pain and physical function will be measured by a 10-item questionnaire; change from baseline in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of bothersomeness due to low back pain will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no bothersomeness) to 100 (worst possible bothersomeness). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of bothersomeness due to low back pain will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no bothersomeness) to 100 (worst possible bothersomeness). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of low back pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of low back pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of bothersomeness due to radicular pain in leg will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no bothersomeness) to 100 (worst possible bothersomeness). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 months
Participant-perceived reduction of bothersomeness due to radicular pain in leg will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no bothersomeness) to 100 (worst possible bothersomeness). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participant-perceived reduction of leg pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 months
Participant-perceived reduction of leg pain intensity will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) with range of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Change from baseline in VAS scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Patient-perceived improvement of pain-related quality of life will be measured by 2-item questionnaire for the subdomain of bodily pain in the Short-Form 36 Rand Health Insurance study batteries (SF-36) questionnaire. Change from baseline in bodily pain subdomain scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 months
Patient-perceived improvement of pain-related quality of life will be measured by 2-item questionnaire for the subdomain of bodily pain in the Short-Form 36 Rand Health Insurance study batteries (SF-36) questionnaire. Change from baseline in bodily pain subdomain scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Patient-perceived improvement of physical function-related quality of life will be measured by 10-item questionnaire for the subdomain of physical function in the Short-Form 36 Rand Health Insurance study batteries (SF-36) questionnaire. Change from baseline in physical function subdomain scale will be used.
Time frame: 3 months
Patient-perceived improvement of physical function-related quality of life will be measured by 10-item questionnaire for the subdomain of physical function in the Short-Form 36 Rand Health Insurance study batteries (SF-36) questionnaire. Change from baseline in physical function subdomain scale will be used.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Patient-reported pain-free walking distance with providing the actual reference distance of 50 meters in the corridor of the research center.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Patients' satisfaction for allocated treatment outcomes will be measured by a single item with 7-point likert scale question (very much satisfied, much satisfied, a bit satisfied, just the same, a bit dissatisfied, much dissatisfied, very much dissatisfied).
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Patients' global assessment for overall treatment outcome will be measured by a single item with 5-point likert scale question (much improved, somewhat improved, just the same as baseline, somewhat worsened, much worsened)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
Information on the use of medication and other non-study healthcare resources will be collected by directly asking the patient at every visit. Patients in the control group who do not visit the research center to receive optional physical therapies will be contacted regularly by short-form message service and phone calling by study investigators. Examples of healthcare resources include analgesics, physical therapies, epidural injection, hospital visits for symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis. Types and frequency of the use of healthcare resources will be assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months from baseline.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months
All expected or unexpected adverse events in both groups will be measured at the every study visit as well as by the telephone interview. Types and frequency of the occurrence of adverse events will be assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months
Each participant's expectancy for allocated treatment to reduce symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis will be measured by a single-item questionnaire ("Do you think your allocated treatment will be [was] helpful to reduce your symptoms related to lumbar spinal stenosis?"). Possible answers will be 0 (not at all helpful) to 6 (very helpful).
Korean Medicine Hospital of Pusan National University
Other
Acupuncture for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Parallel, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study With Usual Care Comparison
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05745129
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Oslo, Norge, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT02348645
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02895555
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Middelfart, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04545983
Bone Diseases, Cervical Myelopathy
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial Details