Activ-L Artificial Disc
DeviceImplantation at one level of the lumbar spine, either L4/L5 or L5/S1.
NCT Number: NCT00589797
The purpose of this study is to learn whether an investigational device called the Activ-L Artificial Disc is safe and effective in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lower (lumbar) spine.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, California, United States
The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Activ-L Artificial Disc for treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine in patients who have been unresponsive to at least six months of prior conservative care. The hypothesis of the study is that the Activ-L Disc is non-inferior to the control (the Charité® Artificial Disc [DePuy Spine] or ProDisc-L® Total Disc Replacement [Synthes Spine]) with respect to the rate of individual subject success at 24 months. Individual subject success is a composite of effectiveness and safety.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implantation at one level of the lumbar spine, either L4/L5 or L5/S1.
Implantation at one level of the lumbar spine, either L4/L5 or L5/S1.
Time frame: 24 months
Measured by absence of treatment failure; absence or serious device related AE; maintenance or improvement of ROM at index level; maintenance or improvement of neurological status; improvement in ODI score.
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of subjects demonstrating no Subsequent Surgical Interventions (SSI's) at the index level (L4-L5 or L5-S1) at 24 months.
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of subjects demonstrating no device related SAE's at 24 months as per the Clinical Events Committee (CEC)
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of subjects demonstrating maintenance or improvement in ROM at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of patients demonstrating maintenance or improvement in combined motor and sensory evaluations at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Percent of subjects demonstrating an improvement of greater than or equal to 15 points at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Number of patients demonstrating improvement in back and leg pain at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Number of subjects demonstrating improvement in two measures of ODI success at 24 months compared to baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Number of subjects demonstrating a greater than or equal to 15% improvement in mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component summary scores at 24 months compared to baseline
Aesculap Implant Systems
Industry
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Aesculap Activ-L™ Artificial Disc in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06199999
Bone Diseases, Confusion
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04984629
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04416321
Bone Diseases, Degenerative Disc Disease
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00948532
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial Details