Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04799860

Act in Time -Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting (AcTi)

The study will support implementation of a health promotive work-way in primary care setting by using external and internal facilitators, with the aim to identify effective implementation strategies and to evaluate intervention uptake. Data will be collected from multiple perspecitves.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Region Örebro County

Örebro, 70185, Sweden

About this study

Insufficient physical activity, hazardous use of alcohol, tobacco use and unhealthy eating habits increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases, cancer and type 2-diabetes. Health-promoting work reduces the disease risk and mortality and should thus be integrated in clinical care processes.

Despite support by the National guideline for prevention and treatment of unhealthy life-style habits, there is a chasm to bridge when integrating evidence into clinical practise. Prerequisites for changing work-ways are often underestimated and left to the individual co-workers to full fill on their own.

Too few patients are asked about life-style habits and too few receive evidence-based measures. The measures taken may also depend on sex, language, residence and caregiver's profession. The investigators strive to support the implementation of a health-promoting way of working that includes self-reporting of life-style habits before a visit and that takes measures for those with at least one unhealthy lifestyle habit.

The aim is to identify effective implementation strategies for health-promoting efforts in the primary care. The perceptions of barriers and opportunities when changing way of working from the target groups (leaders, co-workers, patients) will be used to enhance the possibility of successful implementation. Strategies are enhanced by theories of leading change. External and internal facilitators support the implementation.

The study will evaluate the effects and the implementation process at the level of leaders, patients, co-workers, facilitators and organisation in short (4-6 months) and long term (16-18 months).

The project provides generalizable knowledge on strategies to overcome the gap between evidence and praxis, contributing to utilize an existing synthesized knowledgebase regarding health-promoting and preventative workways in a Swedish primary care setting.

It is central for the health care system to identify successful implementation strategies in order to manage their future mission.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for co-workers:

  • being a caregiver meeting patients and/or
  • being assigned a role as internal or external facilitator in the project

Inclusion criteria

for patients filling in the study specific questionnaire:

  • 18 years or older
  • visiting primary care units a specific time pre- or post implementation support

Inclusion criteria

for personcentered processmapping:

  • : having one or more unhealthy life-style habit 18 years or older

Inclusion criterina for managers:

  • being a manager at a primary care unit or at higher level

Treatment and study plan

health promotive work-way

Behavioral

Clinical intervention: The patient is asked to fill in a screening form with life-style related questions. The caregiver takes adequate measures according to the recommendations of the national guideline and the filled in screeing form. The caregiver documents the measures taken.

Implementation intervention as described previously: using tailored strategies to support implementation of the gudieline-based recommendations

Primary outcomes

  1. Change and trend from baseline documented codes in medical records

    Time frame: Change from baseline (6 months), through study completion up to 6 months after end of implementation support

    specific codes are used for measures related to the guideline recommendations for grade of advice for insufficient physical activity, unhealthy eating habits, hazardous use of alcohol and tobacco use and prescribed physical activity

  2. Change and trend from baseline documented codes in medical records

    Time frame: Change from baseline (6 months), through study completion up to 18 months after end of implementation support

    specific codes are used for measures related to the guideline recommendations for grade of advice for insufficient physical activity, unhealthy eating habits, hazardous use of alcohol and tobacco use and prescribed physical activity

  3. Change in S-NoMAD score (Swedish translation of NoMAD

    Time frame: Change from baseline S-Nomad score up to 4 to 6 months after end of study completion

    23-item questionnaire covering the constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring

  4. Change in S-NoMAD score (Swedish translation of NoMAD

    Time frame: Change from baseline S-Nomad score up to 16 to 18 months after end of study completion

    23-item questionnaire covering the constructs coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in perceived clincial intervention by a study specific questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline up to 4 to 6 months after end of implementation support

    Questions related to the patients' perception on receiving the clinical intervention or not

  2. Change in perceived appropriateness (AIM), feasability (FIM) and acceptability (IAM) of the clinical intevention.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in AIM,IAM and FIM up to 4 to 6 months after end of implementation support

    Appropriateness, feasability, acceptability of the clinical intervention is rated on a 5-graded scale with 4 items per construct

  3. Change in perceived appropriateness (AIM), feasability (FIM) and acceptability (IAM) of the clinical intevention.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in AIM,IAM and FIM up to 16 to18 months after end of implementation support

    Appropriateness, feasability, acceptability of the clinical intervention is rated on a 5-graded scale with 4 items per construct

Other outcomes

  1. Interviews to tailor strategies and evaluate implementation process

    Time frame: Interviews pre-intervention and up to 3 to 6 months after end of implementation support

    Semi-structured interview guides directed to facilitators, co-workers and managers

  2. Interviews to evaluate implementation support, clinical process and thoughts about up-scaling

    Time frame: Interviews pre-intervention and up to 16 to18 months after end of implementation support

    Semi-structured interview guides directed to facilitators, co-workers and managers

  3. Person centered processmapping

    Time frame: At baseline

    Structured workshop with patient representatives

  4. Study specific logbook

    Time frame: Through study completion, in average 16 months

    To measure fidelity, dose and reach and changes at the unit that may affect the implementation process

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Region Örebro County

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Act in Time- Implementation of Health Promotive Work-way in Primary Care Setting - Evaluation of Effect- and Implementation Process (AcTi)

Acronym: AcTi

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 16, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.