Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern
München, Bavaria, 81377, Germany
NCT Number: NCT03863132
Aim of this study is to evaluate whether microsurgical repair or replacement of the aortic valve is a treatment option for a subgroup of patients suffering from aortic Stenosis.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
München, Bavaria, 81377, Germany
Stenosis of the aortic valve leads to a narrowing of the valve, consequently to low blood flow from the heart into the Aorta, and is associated with symptoms like fatigue, breathlessness, dizziness, fainting, and chest pain. For many of the patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis surgical or catheter-assisted repair or replacement of the damaged aortic valve has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment option.
Probably about 20-30% of patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis display a deviation from the usually observed disease pattern: These patients do not show the typical high pressure difference between the left ventricle (heart chamber) and the aorta (transvalvular gradient; "paradoxical" low flow/low gradient aortic stenosis). For these patients it is not yet clear, if microsurgical repair of the aortic valve (transcatheter aortic valve repair - TAVR) should be a treatment option as well.
REBOOT-PARADOX evaluates whether TAVR is advantageous compared to optimal medical Treatment alone for patients suffering from paradoxical aortic stenosis. Two thirds of the participating patients will be treated by TAVR, one third will receive medical Treatment alone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Repair of defective aortic valve by microsurgical Intervention.
Time frame: 24 months after last-patient-in
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 5 years after index treatment
Death because of cardiovascular events
Time frame: 5 years after index treatment
Number of hospital stays after randomization
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
Number of strokes
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
Number of transient ischaemic attacks
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
Echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in %
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
Measurement of aortic pressure in mmHg
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
EQ5D-score in %
Time frame: 5 years after randomization
Number of reinterventions (TAVR arm only)
IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung
Other
Optimal Medical Treatment With or Without Valve Repair in Patients With Symptomatic Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis - a Multi-center, Randomized Comparison
Acronym: REBOOT-PARADOX
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07477002
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04722250
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Replacement
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03112980
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02701283
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details