Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06333912

Accuracy of Guided Ridge Splitting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Dental Implant Atrophic Maxilla Bone Diseases Bone Resorption Jaw Diseases Maxillary Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases

Age range

20 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Alexandria University, Faculty of dentistry

Alexandria, 21619, Egypt

About this study

Two groups one treated with ridge splitting using guided surgery and the other one treated with freehand surgery and both groups had simultaneous dental implants the first one had guided placement and the other one was freehand.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with missing maxillary anteriors or premolars teeth.
  • Tooth extraction at the implant sites was performed at least 4 months before the surgery.
  • The bone width of the crestal one -third (3-5 mm) with sufficient bone height allowing for simultaneous implant placement.
  • Free from any systemic disease or local pathological lesions that may affect bone healing or contraindicate implant placement.
  • With no history of any previous grafting surgeries at the area of interest.

Exclusion criteria

  • Sever concavity of the alveolar ridge.
  • Bad oral hygiene ( Silness-Löe index (score 2-3).
  • Heavy smoker (smoke greater than or equal 25 cigarettes per day).
  • Presence of acute infections or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth.
  • Parafunctional habits.
  • Pregnant females.

Treatment and study plan

dental implant placement with ridge splitting.

Procedure

ridge splitting to increase bone width in atrophic maxilla with simultaneous implant placement

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessing the accuracy of guided surgery

    Time frame: one week

    superimposition of post-op cbct to the planned position to check the accuracy of implant positions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. the bone-width increase between control and study group.

    Time frame: 6 months

    evaluation of two techniques of ridge splitting in increasing bone width.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alexandria University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Accuracy of Novel Ridge Splitting Guide Design in Comparison to Freehand With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Mar 27, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.