VA San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94121, United States
NCT Number: NCT04858126
This Study will compare the accuracy of the ECOM Plus Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM) without the use of the arterial pressure waveform from the arterial line to 1) the current clinical standard of cardiac output measured by intermittent room temperature bolus thermodilution using a PAC, 2) the current ECOM System with the use of the arterial blood pressure waveform from a radial arterial line and 3) the Flo-Trac® System.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94121, United States
This Study will compare the accuracy of the ECOM Plus Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM) without the use of the arterial pressure waveform from the arterial line to 1) the current clinical standard of cardiac output measured by intermittent room temperature bolus thermodilution using a PAC, 2) the current ECOM System with the use of the arterial blood pressure waveform from a radial arterial line and 3) the Flo-Trac® System (Edwards LifeSciences).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Measure cardiac output during perioperative period and compare to pulmonary artery catheter thermal dilution cardiac output measurement.
Time frame: 6 months.
Correlation via linear regression between thermal dilution and ECOM Plus included as an "R" to coefficient. Cardiac output measured by thermal dilution and impedance cardiography. Management of the patients using standard thermal dilution derived CO measurement only. The ECOM Plus measurement output are for research purposes only and not to be used in the management of the patient. ECOM Plus impedance cardiography measured in the ICU when routine thermal dilution CO measurements are made. Continued impedance measurements until tracheal extubation.
ECOM Medical, Inc.
Industry
Accuracy of the ECOM Plus Hemodynamic Monitor Versus Pulmonary Artery Catheter
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07516470
Anesthesia, General, Fluid Responsiveness Predictability
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05496322
Blood Pressure Determination, Hemodynamic Monitoring
Messina, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05930600
Fluid Responsiveness, Hemodynamic Monitoring
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT04972266
Hemodynamic Monitoring
Paris, France
View Trial Details