Arizona State Univertsity, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, United States
NCT Number: NCT02053259
The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate adaptive goal setting and feedback interventions (Adaptive Interventions) to promote physical activity behaviors and compare it to static physical activity interventions (Static Interventions) using two levels of goal setting (Adaptive Goals vs. Static Goals) and two levels of reinforcement procedures (Praise/Rewards and No Praise/Rewards) in a 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial. All four groups will receive the intervention via a semi-automated text message system developed by the investigators study team.
The primary aim of this study will be to:
1. Evaluate whether the adaptive interventions result in greater change in physical activity (pedometer-measured steps/day) compared to the static Intervention groups. HYPOTHESES: Participants in the adaptive interventions will increase their steps/day more than participants in the Static Intervention groups. The Adaptive Goals and Reinforcement Group will outperform the other 3 groups.
The secondary aims of this study will be to: 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the adaptive and static goal interventions in improving anthropometric, cardiovascular fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors. HYPOTHESES: Participants in the adaptive interventions will show greater improvements in fitness, lean and fat body mass, and serum biomarkers than participants in the Static Intervention groups. The Adaptive Goals and Reinforcement Group will outperform the other 3 groups. 3. to assess participants' satisfaction with the overall program.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Daily for 4 months
Given this study used a 2 condition (adaptive vs. static goals) x 2 condition (immediate vs. delayed financial reinforcement) randomized factorial design we report main effects for each condition. Sample sizes for main effects will be 96 participants for each comparison (Adaptive vs. Static goals or Immediate vs. Delayed Reinforcement) as the other condition. Consistent with proper analyses of factorial designs, main effects for the goal setting conditions pool participants across reinforcement conditions, and main effects for reinforcement conditions pool participants across goal setting conditions.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Arizona State University
Other
Walking Intervention Through Texting Study: A Factorial Trial
Acronym: WalkIT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03946241
Behavior, Body Weight
Odense, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT02416882
Behavior, Body Weight
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02444247
Behavior, Body Weight
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02717663
Behavior, Goals
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details