USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58203, United States
NCT Number: NCT02444247
The purpose of this study is to understand how to make exercise more attractive to people.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–49 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58203, United States
This investigation will address increased physical activity and will yield empirical evidence to inform developing tools to help individuals make healthy choices regarding physical activity (PA) and maintenance of healthy body weight. Behavioral Choice Theory provides a framework for understanding choices people make and how to shift an individual's choice toward healthier alternatives. The theory holds that choice is based on the relative motivating values of alternatives. One way to shift choice toward a healthier alternative is to increase the relative reinforcing value (RRV), or motivating value, of that alternative. Thus, increasing the RRV of PA behaviors could shift choice towards PA and away from less healthy, sedentary alternatives.
Increasing the RRV of PA may allow PA to compete with more reinforcing, sedentary behaviors, resulting in a shift in behavioral choice. This process is termed "incentive sensitization", which was originally proposed to explain drug addiction. Incentive Sensitization theory posits that the RRV of a behavior is increased through repeated exposures, which produce neuroadaptations that increase craving of the behavior - after repeated exposures to a stimulus, a 'sensitization' or hypersensitivity to the incentive motivational effects of the stimulus follows. Another factor that influences motivation for a behavior is the development of tolerance to unpleasant aspects of that behavior. Opponent-Process Theory would account for the acquisition of motives where the initial reinforcer may be negative - the affect experienced after repeated exposures is opposite to that experienced during the first few presentations. For exercise, this would include tolerance to any discomfort, pain, fatigue and displeasure and a greater positive post-exercise affective response: the affect experienced during and after exercise has a greater motivational significance in PA participation than knowledge and beliefs regarding health benefits. Therefore, the investigators propose that repeated exposures to PA will produce tolerance to unpleasant aspects while increasing the post-exercise affect. Sensitizing PA reinforcement and increasing discomfort tolerance may be associated with increasing the duration and intensity of daily activity. There are likely to be individual differences in sensitization of PA reinforcement and development of discomfort tolerance. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alter dopamine tone in the central dopaminergic reward system and SNPs associated with altered pain perception may contribute to such individual differences. The investigators anticipate that a moderate PA dose (300 kilocalorie [kcal] expenditure) will produce greater incentive sensitization and tolerance than a low dose (150 kcal) and that SNPs related to central dopamine tone and pain perception may contribute to individual differences in incentive sensitization and changes in physical activity after repeated exposures to physical activity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will participate in 3 physical activity sessions per week expending 300 kcal per session and rate their liking of exercise.
Subjects will participate in 3 physical activity sessions per week expending 150 kcal per session and rate their liking of exercise.
Subjects will participate in 3 sessions per week expending 0 kcal per session and rate their liking of exercise.
Subjects will rate their liking of sedentary activities (reading magazines, playing word games, puzzles) as an alternative to exercise.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
RRV of physical activity will be assessed by evaluating the number of responses (mouse button presses) a subject is willing to complete to gain access to physical activity or a sedentary alternative.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in preference for intense physical activity and tolerance for exercise discomfort will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q).
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Minutes of physical activity will be assessed by having participants wear an Actigraph accelerometer for 7 days (minimum 10 hours per day) on the right hip.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes perceived support for physical activity from friends and family members will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Social Norms and Support for Exercise Questionnaire.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceptions of how much exercise satisfies autonomy, relatedness, and competence needs will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in intrinsic, external, interrogated, identified, introjected and amotivation for physical activity will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise, 3rd Edition (BREQ-3).
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceived effort expended during exercise will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceived pain/discomfort during exercise will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Muscle Pain Questionnaire.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceived ability to continue exercise long-term will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceived ability to stick to an exercise routine will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Exercise Confidence Survey.
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in perceived affective responses (energy, tiredness, tension, calmness) to exercise will be assessed by self-report questionnaire responses to the Activation Deactivation Adjective Check List (ADCL).
Time frame: Week 0, Week 6, Week 10
Changes in average daily calorie intake will be assessed by reporting all foods and beverages consumed over a 3-day period.
USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center
Fed
Acronym: Motiv2Ex
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02416882
Behavior, Body Weight
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03566277
Behavior, Body Weight
View Trial DetailsNCT03273361
Behavior, Body Weight
View Trial DetailsNCT02102763
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial Details