Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02820753

A Universal Medication Schedule to Promote Adherence to Complex Drug Regimens

This study will leverage available technologies and test strategies to impart the Universal Medication Schedule (UMS) in primary care to help patients understand, consolidate, safely use, and adhere to their complex medication regimens.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

About this study

The study investigators will conduct a patient-randomized controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design to compare the effectiveness of interventions, alone or in combination, to one another. 1505 English and Spanish-speaking patients who are ≥ 50 years old, from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in Chicago, and prescribed ≥ 3 Rx medications will be randomized to receive: 1) Enhanced Usual Care (EHR tools), 2) EHR tools + SMS, 3) EHR + Portal, or 4) EHR + SMS + Portal.

The study aims to:

  • Compare the effectiveness of the UMS EHR tools, with or without SMS and/or Portal interventions.
  • Evaluate the 'fidelity' (reliability) of each strategy and explore patient, staff, physician, and health system factors influencing the delivery of the interventions, alone and in combination
  • Assess the costs required to deliver each of the interventions from a health system perspective

Due to an NIA administrative hold, the interventions were not implemented as planned. Hence it was determined that the primary analysis would be "per-protocol" rather than intent-to-treat to assess the effect of the interventions under optimal conditions. Participants who either received the initial 6 weeks of SMS messaging continuously, or logged on to the patient portal and completed at least one survey will be considered as receiving the intervention. Those who have not received the initial 6 weeks of texting or completed at least 1 portal survey will be considered as enhanced usual care.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 50+
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Prescribed 3+ medications
  • Primarily responsible for administering own medication
  • Owns a cell phone and feels comfortable receiving texts
  • Access and proficient in using internet at home and has a personal email address

Exclusion criteria

  • Major cognitive, visual, or hearing impairment
  • Doesn't meet inclusion criteria.

Treatment and study plan

EHR + (Text or Portal)

Behavioral

Per protocol analysis:

Patients who received the initial 6 weeks of SMS messaging continuously, or logged on to the patient portal and completed at least one survey.

Primary outcomes

  1. Medication Adherence - Pill Count

    Time frame: 6 months after Baseline

    Pill Count is conducted for all pill form medications using an electronic pill counter at baseline and 6 months. The proportion of pills taken over pills prescribed (PT/PP) will be calculated for each medication at each time point. Pills taken will be calculated by subtracting the number of pills from the total quantity prescribed. Pills prescribed will be calculated by multiplying the number of pills prescribed each day by the number of days since the medication was filled. A proportion of pills taken over pills prescribed (PT/PP) of 80% or more is considered adherent.

    Analyses were performed using 2-level Generalized linear models (PROC GENMOD), with medications nested in participants and with a logit link.

    Confounding variables, such as adherence at baseline, gender, age, language, health status and medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) were included as fixed effects in the models. Results are presented as predicted probabilities with 95% Confidence Intervals.

  2. Medication Adherence - Proper Use

    Time frame: 6 Months after Baseline

    Participants are asked questions about their 24 hour recall of medication use for each of their medications; they are asked to specify the amount taken (dose), the number of times the med was taken (frequency), the total number of pills taken, and when the doses were taken (to calculate spacing: hours between doses). Proper Use will be scored as yes or no, reflecting having demonstrated all of the following: correct dose, frequency, total and spacing based on the medication bottle instructions. Results are presented as predicted probabilities with 95% Confidence Intervals.

    Analyses were performed using 2-level Generalized linear models (PROC GENMOD), with medications nested in participants and with a logit link.

    Confounding variables, such as recruitment time, clinic, health status, gender, age, time effect, and medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) were included as fixed effects in the models.

  3. Medication Adherence - ASK12

    Time frame: 6 Months after Baseline

    Participants completed the ASK-12 questionnaire, a brief measure of adherence that cover three key domains: inconvenience/forgetfulness, treatment beliefs and behavior.

    The ASK-12 is scored by summing the selected responses (with scores ranging from 12 to 60) with higher scores indicating greater barriers to adherence.

    Analyses were performed using Generalized linear models (PROC GENMOD), with a repeated subject effect, and an identity link.

    Confounding variables such as health status, gender, age, health activation (CHAI), language, time effect and number of chronic conditions were included as fixed effects in the models. Results are presented as predicted probabilities with 95% Confidence Intervals.

Other outcomes

  1. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: 6 months after Baseline

    Systolic blood pressure will be collected on all participants at baseline and 6 months.

    Change of Systolic blood pressure from baseline will be measured, only in those who are diagnosed with hypertension. Negative Least Square Means indicate a decrease of systolic blood pressure, whereas a positive Least Square Means indicate an increase of systolic blood pressure by 6 Months.

    Analyses were performed using Generalized linear models (PROC GENMOD), with an identity link.

    Confounding variables, such as mean systolic blood pressure at baseline, gender, age, race, and number of prescribed medications were included as fixed effects in the models. Results are presented as adjusted least square means with 95% Confidence Intervals.

  2. Hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: 6 months after Baseline

    Hemoglobin A1c (hbA1c) will be collected on diabetic patients only, at baseline and 6 months.

    Change of hbA1c from baseline is modelled. A positive Least Square Mean indicates an increase of hbA1c at 6 months, whereas a negative Least Square Mean indicates a decrease of hbA1c.

    Analyses were performed using Generalized linear models (PROC GENMOD), with an identity link.

    Confounding variables, such as hbA1c at baseline, gender, age, health status, language, medication regimen complexity index (MRCI), and health literacy (Newest Vital Sign) were included as fixed effects in the models. Results are presented as adjusted least square means with 95% Confidence Intervals.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Collaborators

  • Emory University
  • University of North Carolina
  • Vanderbilt University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 1, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 1, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.