Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02573350

A Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Orally Administered OPC-67683

A phase 2, multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label trial in participants with Multi-drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Only participants who completed Trial 242-07-204 (NCT00685360) were eligible. The trial was performed globally at 14 sites qualified to treat MDR-TB. All 434 participants who completed Trial 242-07-204 were eligible for this trial if there was still potential clinical benefit to them and all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were met.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide written, informed consent prior to all trial-related procedures
  • Male or female participants aged between 18 and 64 years, inclusive, at the time of enrollment into the 242-07-204 trial. Participants who were 64 years at the time of 204 enrollment and who are now 65 years, are eligible for this trial.
  • Participants who have completed trial 242-07-204
  • Participants judged by the investigator to have the potential for clinical benefit from OPC-67683 exposure
  • Able to produce sputum for mycobacterial culture or able to obtain sputum produced through induction
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use a highly effective method of birth control throughout the participation in the trial and for 22 weeks after last dose.
  • Male participants must agree to use an adequate method of contraception (double barrier) throughout the participation in the trial and for 30 weeks after last dose.

Exclusion criteria

  • Greater than 30 days has elapsed from the participant's date of completion in the 242-07-204 trial or greater than 30 days has elapsed since the patient's trial investigator's site was initiated in this trial, whichever is later.
  • A history of allergy to any nitro-imidazoles or nitro-imidazole derivates at any time.
  • Use of the medications in Section 5.4.7 including: use of amiodarone at any time during the previous 12 months, use of other anti-arrhythmics for the previous 30 days, and use of certain other medications, including certain anti-depressants, anti-histamines, and macrolides, for the previous 14 days.
  • Any current serious concomitant conditions or renal impairment characterized by serum creatinine levels ≥265 moles per liter (mol/L) or hepatic impairment characterized by Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate transferase (AST) levels 3 times the upper limit of the laboratory reference range from the screening lab results.
  • Current clinically relevant changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) (between Trial 242-07-204 Day 56 assessment and baseline) such as any atrioventricular (AV) block, prolongation of the QRS complex over 120 milliseconds (msec) (in both male and female participants), or the corrected QT interval using Fridericia's method (QTcF) interval over 450 msec in male participants and 470 msec in female participants.
  • Current clinically relevant cardiovascular disorders such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension, arrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia or status after myocardial infarction.
  • Any participants with known or reported significant psychiatric history.
  • For participants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, CD4 cell count less than 350/cubic millimeter (mm^3) or on treatment with antiretroviral medication for HIV infection.
  • Karnofsky score under 50 percent (%) while hospitalized and less than 60% while not hospitalized.
  • Any current diseases or conditions in which the use of nitro-imidazoles or nitro-imidazole derivates is contra-indicated.
  • Evidence of clinically significant metabolic, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric or endocrine diseases, malignancy, or other abnormalities (other than the indication being studied).
  • Known or suspected alcohol abuse, that is, abuse sufficient enough to compromise the safety or cooperation of the participants in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Administered an investigational medicinal product (IMP) within 1 month prior to Visit 1 other than OPC-67683 given as IMP in trial 242-07-204.
  • Pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to conceive or father a child within the timeframe described in the informed consent form.
  • Recent use of methadone, benzodiazepines, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, tetrahydrocannabinol, barbiturates, and opiates as determined by a urine drug screen, unless evidence is provided that the positive drug screen is the result of authorized medications or products prescribed by a physician for a non-abuse related indication.
  • Any disorder that in the judgment of the investigator makes the participant not a good candidate for the trial or may prevent the participant from reliably participating in the entire course of the trial.

Treatment and study plan

Delamanid

Drug

Delamanid was administered orally twice daily as 50-mg tablets under fed conditions in the morning and evening.

Other names: OPC-67683, Deltyba

OBR

Drug

Selection and administration of the treatment medications (i.e. OBRs) was based on World Health Organization (WHO's) Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant TB, in conjunction with national TB program guidelines. Study investigators could change OBR for a participant based on his/her tolerability and drug susceptibility testing (DST) results.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

    Vital signs included weight (kg), body temperature (degree Celsius), heart rate [beats/minute (bpm)], systolic and diastolic blood pressure [millimetre of mercury (mm Hg)]. The criteria for clinically significant abnormal value for: weight was decrease or increase of >=5% in body weight, heart rate was <=60 bpm and decrease of >=15 bpm; >=120 bpm and Increase of >=15 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <=90 mm Hg and decrease of >=20 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <=50 mm Hg and decrease of >=15 mm Hg, all vital signs relative to Baseline. Baseline is Study 204 completion visit (Day 84) for participants who complete the baseline visit within 7 days of completing Study 204. Only categories with data for potentially clinically significant abnormal vital sign parameter values are reported.

  2. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

    The criteria for clinically significant abnormal ECG values were ventricular rate outlier (<50 bpm and decrease of >=25%, >100 bpm and increase of >=25%), PR outlier (increase of >=25% when PR >200 milliseconds (ms)), QRS outlier (increase of >=25% when QRS >100 ms), QT (new onset (in treatment period but not at Baseline) [>500 ms]), QT interval corrected by Bazett's formula (QTcB) (new onset [>450, >480, >500 ms], increase of >=30 ms and <= 60 ms or increase of >60 ms), QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) (new onset [>450, >480, >500 ms], increase of >=30 ms and <= 60 ms or increase of >60 ms), new abnormal U waves, new ST segment changes, new T wave changes, new abnormal rhythm, new conduction abnormality were reported as categories. Only categories with data are reported.

  3. Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Laboratory Test

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

    Laboratory assessments included parameters for serum chemistry (alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, cholesterol, gamma-glutamyl transferase, glucose, lactic dehydrogenase, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, uric acid), hematology (white blood cell count eosinophils, absolute, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, absolute, mean corpuscular volume, neutrophil, bands, neutrophils, neutrophils, absolute, platelet count, red blood cell (RBC) count, reticulocyte count) and urinalysis (blood, epithelial cast, granular cast, hyaline cast, RBCs per high power field (RBC/HPF)). The participants were categorized based on the clinically significant laboratory values as per predefined criteria. The categories with at least one participant with clinically significant value outside the normal range for laboratory assessments are reported.

  4. Number of Participants With Abnormality in Audiometry at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline

    Audiometry assessments were done at Baseline.

  5. Number of Participants With Abnormality in Visual Acuity

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

  6. Number of Participants With Abnormality in Neurological and Psychiatric Assessment Reported as Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    Time frame: From first dose through 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 30 weeks)

    Participants with abnormal neurological and psychiatric assessments were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE is any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of study drug.

  7. Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Thyroid Function Test Reported as TEAE

    Time frame: From first dose through 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 30 weeks)

    Participants with abnormal thyroid free T4 nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (>=3 OR <=0.3 micro-international units per litre (uIU/mL). An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE is any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of study drug.

  8. Number of Participants With Any Concomitant Medication Usage

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

    Concomitant medications are defined as medications that started on or after the first day of study treatment or were started prior to study treatment but were ongoing on the first day of study treatment.

  9. Percentage of Participants With At Least One TEAEs and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: From first dose through 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 30 weeks)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE is any new AE or worsening of an existing condition after initiation of study drug. An SAE is an AE that resulted in death, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life-threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event.

  10. Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Coagulation (PT and aPTT) Reported as TEAE

    Time frame: From first dose through 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 30 weeks)

    Participants with clinically significant abnormal coagulation (prothrombin time (PT) >17.5 seconds and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) >45 seconds) were reported.

  11. Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormality in Cortisol

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 26

    Participants with clinically significant cortisol >=26 micrograms/decilitre (ug/dL) were reported.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Treatment Responders Using the Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    Treatment Responder was defined as a participant classified as sustained converter or a new converter. Sustained Converter was defined as a participant with sputum culture conversion (SCC) at baseline and without any positive culture result during the 26-week trial period. New converter was defined as a participant without SCC at baseline who subsequently met the definition of SCC. A participant was classified as having achieved SCC if he/she achieved 2 consecutive sputum cultures negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) at least 28 days apart after his/her last sputum culture that was positive for growth. The total percentage of treatment responders was calculated as the number of sustained converters plus the number of new converters divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  2. Percentage of Treatment Responders Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    Treatment Responder was defined as a participant classified as sustained converter or a new converter. Sustained Converter was defined as a participant with SCC at baseline and without any positive culture result during the 26-week trial period. New converter was defined as a participant without SCC at baseline who subsequently met the definition of SCC. A participant was classified as having achieved SCC if he/she achieved 2 consecutive sputum cultures negative for growth of MTB at least 28 days apart after his/her last sputum culture that was positive for growth. The total percentage of treatment responders was calculated as the number of sustained converters plus the number of new converters divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population. Efficacy was assessed by the solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion)

  3. Percentage of Treatment Non-responders Using the MGIT Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    Non-responders were defined as participants classified as non-converter or reverter. Non-converters were defined as participants without SCC at baseline and who did not achieve SCC during the 26-week trial period whereas reverters were participants with SCC at baseline and at least one positive post-baseline result. The total percentage of treatment non-responders was calculated as the number of reverters plus the number of non-converters divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion)

  4. Percentage of Treatment Non-responders Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    Non-responders were defined as participants classified as non-converter or reverter. Non-converters were defined as participants without SCC at baseline and who did not achieve SCC during the 26-week trial period whereas reverters were participants with SCC at baseline and at least one positive post-baseline result. Treatment Non-responders was calculated as the number of reverters plus the number of non-converters divided by the total number of participants in the analysis population. Efficacy was assessed by the Solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  5. Percentage of Sustained Converters Using the MGIT Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of sustained converters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset who had SCC at baseline and non-positive sputum culture results for all post-baseline visits. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion)

  6. Percentage of Sustained Converters Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of sustained converters was defined as percentage of participants in the analysis dataset who had SCC at baseline and non-positive sputum culture results for all post-baseline visits. Determined by Solid culture medium. Efficacy was assessed by the solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion)

  7. Percentage of New Converters Using the MGIT Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of new converters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset without SCC at baseline who achieved SCC during the 26-week trial period. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  8. Percentage of New Converters Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of new converters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset without SCC at baseline who achieved SCC during the 26-week trial period. Efficacy was assessed by the solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  9. Percentage of Non-converters Using the MGIT Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of non-converters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset without SCC at baseline and who did not achieve SCC during the 26-week trial period. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  10. Percentage of Non-converters Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of non-converters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset without SCC at baseline and who did not achieve SCC during the 26-week trial period. Efficacy was assessed by the solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  11. Percentage of Reverters Using the MGIT Culture System

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of reverters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset with SCC at baseline and at least one positive post-baseline result. Efficacy was assessed by the MGIT sputum culture system (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  12. Percentage of Reverters Using Solid Culture Medium

    Time frame: Week 26

    The total percentage of reverters was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis dataset with SCC at baseline and at least one positive post-baseline result. Efficacy was assessed by the solid culture medium (ie, sputum culture conversion).

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Developed Resistance to Delamanid While on Treatment

    Time frame: Up to Week 26

    Resistance was defined as mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) growth on the delamanid-containing medium of greater than 1% of that on the drug-free medium. The overall resistance to delamanid during the study was assessed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Multi-center, Uncontrolled, Open-label Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Orally Administered OPC-67683 as 100 mg BID With Optional Titration to 200 mg BID for up to Six Months Exposure in Patients With Pulmonary Multi-drug Resistant Tuberculosis

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Oct 9, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.