Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04796935

A Study to Test Performance of Needle Placements for Neuraxial Procedures Using Tactile Imaging vs Control

This study will compare the VerTouch device to the conventional palpation technique for performing diagnostic and therapeutic neuraxial procedures.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Neuraxial procedures, in which a needle is inserted into the spinal canal through a gap in the vertebrae, are performed at a rate of nearly 13 million per year in the US, across a myriad of diagnostic and therapeutic clinical scenarios.

The standard of care involves manual palpation of the patient's back to detect the spinous processes (SPs) and estimate the location of the interspinous needle insertion site. While providers are trained to perform these procedures with meticulous precision and attention to detail, this technique remains highly inaccurate, often requiring multiple insertion attempts to properly place the needle. These attempts lead to patient pain and complications, such as traumatic taps and post-dural puncture (PDPH) headaches; unpredictable procedure times; and poor facility throughput.

The VerTouch device uses tactile imaging to offer a non-invasive, untethered, non radiation-producing solution for visualizing spinal anatomy in order to identify an ideal location for needle placement in a neuraxial procedure. The device can be used to mark the identified site with a surgical marker, or to begin placement of a needle or introducer at that site.

Study participants will be recruited in two parallel cohorts: the control (palpation) group or the tactile imaging (VerTouch) group, further stratified by procedure setting, including emergency medicine, neurology, and anesthesiology. Once an insertion site is marked with a marker or shallow placement of a needle or introducer, the procedure will continue in the usual manner for subjects in both groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females aged 18 years and above, inclusive
  • Subjects scheduled for one of the following procedures:
  • Diagnostic LP (collection of CSF and/or measurement of ICP to diagnose hemorrhaging or neurological infections)
  • Therapeutic LP (intrathecal injection of therapeutic agents; drainage of CSF to treat pseudotumor cerebri)
  • Planned orthopedic or obstetric procedure, such as labor/induction, cesarean section, hysterectomy, or total hip/knee replacement, with neuraxial anesthesia (injection of anesthetic into spinal and/or epidural space to reduce pain during procedure)
  • Epidural blood patch (use of autologous blood to close holes in the dura mater and relieve PDPH)
  • Subjects having a BMI ≤42kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient does not provide informed consent
  • Skin or soft tissue infection near the puncture site
  • Allergy to local anesthetic
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Acute spinal cord trauma
  • History of lumbar spinal surgery
  • Prior known failed neuraxial anesthesia
  • Diagnosed scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, scleroderma, or ankylosing spondylitis, or lumbar spinal stenosis
  • Incarcerated subjects

Treatment and study plan

Tactile Imaging (VerTouch)

Device

VerTouch device used to identify and mark, or begin placement of a needle at an insertion site. After the device is taken off the back, the procedure will continue in the usual manner.

Control (palpation)

Other

Control, palpation used to identify and mark an insertion site.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Insertion Attempts

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per participant

    Any forward movement of the needle following puncture of the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of First-insertion Success

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that does not require any reinsertions, but can include any number of redirections.

  2. Number of Redirections

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Any forward movement of the needle in a new direction not preceded by withdrawal from the skin, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

  3. Number of Passes

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Any forward movement of the needle, calculated as the sum of insertions and redirections.

  4. Incidence of First-pass Success

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that does not require reinsertions or redirections.

  5. Subject Discomfort During Landmarking

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Evaluated using a 10-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale, where 1 is equivalent to no pain and 10 is equivalent to the worst possible pain.

  6. Provider Confidence With the Identified Insertion Site

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Evaluated using a 1-5 point Numeric Rating Scale where 1 is equivalent to not at all confident and 5 equivalent to completely confident.

Other outcomes

  1. Localization Time

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Time from first touch of draped patient to identification of an insertion site; for VerTouch, this is the time from VerTouch device placement to movement of the applicator to the identified insertion site.

  2. Insertion Time

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Time from retrieval of marker or local-anesthetic assembly until no further needle advancements are made.

  3. Total Procedure Time

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    From positioning of the patient to removal of the drape from the subject's back.

  4. Bone Contacts

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    Number of times the needle contacts bone, counted until confirmation of spinal canal access can be assessed.

  5. Incidence of Unintended Dural Puncture

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that results in puncture of the dura when it is not intended (i.e., in an epidural procedure).

  6. Incidence of Paresthesia During Needle Insertion

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case in which paresthesia is experienced during needle insertion.

  7. Incidence of Traumatic Tap

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that results in visible blood aspiration.

  8. Incidence of Referral to Radiology

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case in which the provider cannot perform the procedure at the bedside and refers the subject to radiology for the procedure to be completed under fluoroscopic guidance.

  9. Incidence of Conversion From Spinal to Epidural

    Time frame: End of procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that the provider opts to complete using epidural anesthesia instead of spinal anesthesia.

  10. Incidence of Post-dural Puncture Headache

    Time frame: Follow up, 3±2 days after procedure, 1 per subject

    A case that results in the patient experiencing one or more headache of any level of severity after the procedure and/or at follow-up.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IntuiTap Medical, Inc

Industry

Collaborators

  • ICON plc

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-Label, Parallel, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Performance of Needle Placements for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuraxial Procedures, Using a Handheld Tactile Imaging-based Method Versus Palpation

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 15, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.