Asciminib
DrugAsciminib 80 mg QD administered under fasting conditions.
Other names: ABL001
NCT Number: NCT05456191
The primary purpose of this study was to assess the tolerability of oral asciminib (80 mg QD) in comparison with that of the second generation (2G) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) nilotinib (300 mg BID), in adult patients with newly diagnosed Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (Ph+ CML-CP).
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Novartis Investigative Site, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
The study is designed to compare the tolerability of asciminib with nilotinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with Ph+ CML-CP and has 3 phases: Treatment Phase, Optional Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) Phase, and Treatment Re-initiation (TRI) Phase.
Participants were randomized in the study in a 1:1 ratio to asciminib or nilotinib. No crossover of study treatment across arms were allowed.
Randomization was stratified based on European Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) long-term survival (ELTS) score (low versus intermediate versus high) to help achieve a balance between the treatment arms.
An interim analysis was planned in the protocol when 46 discontinuations due to AE occurred. The purpose of the interim analysis was to allow an early assessment of the tolerability of asciminib and the goal was to continue to primary analysis regardless of the outcome of the interim analysis. Therefore, following the interim analysis, the primary analysis was performed when approximately 65 discontinuations of either study treatment due to Adverse Event (AE) occurred.
Eligible participants on both arms may choose to participate in an optional 2-year Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Phase. Participants with loss of Major Molecular Response (MMR) during TFR Phase will enter the Treatment Re-initiation (TRI) Phase. Additionally, treatment re-initiation in the TRI Phase may be based on investigator or participant decision.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
~ < 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in peripheral blood and bone marrow,
~< 20% basophils in the peripheral blood,
Inclusion criteria
for optional Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Phase:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Highly effective contraception methods include:
In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.
Women are considered post-menopausal if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g., age appropriate history of vasomotor symptoms). Women are considered not of child bearing potential if they are post-menopausal or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy at least six weeks prior to enrollment on the study. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered to be not of child bearing potential.
Sexually active males taking study treatment do not require contraception. - Known hypersensitivity to the study treatment. Note: The Investigator has the discretion to include/exclude a patient in the study, who will be found to have symptoms representative of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) or tested positive for COVID-19 during the screening phase. Such patients should be managed as per the country specific guidelines related to COVID-19. For patients who test positive for COVID-19, re-testing is recommended before initiating study treatment.
Exclusion criteria
for optional Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Phase:
Exclusion criteria
for Treatment Re-initiation (TRI) Phase
Asciminib 80 mg QD administered under fasting conditions.
Other names: ABL001
Nilotinib 300 mg twice a day (BID) was administered under fasting conditions.
Time frame: From date of first dose to date of treatment discontinuation due to AE, assessed after 50 events had occurred, about 2 years since first patient first visit (FPFV).
TTDAE is defined as the interval from the date of first study treatment administration to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to an adverse event (AE). The comparison between the asciminib and nilotinib treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, in which discontinuations due to AE are considered the event of interest and discontinuations for reasons other than AE are treated as competing risks. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to AE within the specified timeframe is presented in the results table. The formal comparison between treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, and the corresponding hazard ratio, confidence interval, and p-value are provided in the Statistical Analysis section. The TTDAE endpoint is event-driven by counting how many participants have experienced treatment discontinuations due to AE.
Time frame: From date of first dose to date of treatment discontinuation due to AE, assessed after 67 events had occurred, about 2.5 years since first patient first visit (FPFV),
TTDAE is defined as the interval from the date of first study treatment administration to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to an adverse event (AE). The comparison between the asciminib and nilotinib treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, in which discontinuations due to AE are considered the event of interest and discontinuations for reasons other than AE are treated as competing risks. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to AE within the specified timeframe is presented in the results table. The formal comparison between treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, and the corresponding hazard ratio, confidence interval, and p-value are provided in the Statistical Analysis section. The TTDAE endpoint is event-driven by counting how many participants have experienced treatment discontinuations due to AE.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MMR will be assessed using fusion gene of the BCR and ABL genes (BCR-ABL) transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants with MMR at each time point will be assessed.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MMR will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MMR) at or before the specified visit will be calculated.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MR4.0 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants with MR4.0 at each time point will be assessed.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MR4.0 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MR4.0) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MR4.5 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants with MR4.5 at each time point will be assessed.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
MR4.5 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MR4.5) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Hematologic response will be assessed by complete blood count and physical examination at each visit.
The percentage of participants with CHR at each time point will be assessed.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Hematologic response will be assessed by complete blood count and physical examination at each visit.
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (CHR) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved BCR::ABL1 ratio ≤1% at the specified visit will be calculated
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved BCR::ABL1 ratio ≤1% at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Duration of MMR is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MMR and the earliest date of loss of MMR, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Duration of MR4.0 is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MR4 and the earliest date of loss of MR4, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Duration of MR4.5 is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MR4.5 and the earliest date of loss of MR4.5, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Time to first MMR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MMR.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Time to first MR4.0 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MR4.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Time to first MR4.5 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MR4.5.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
TTF is defined as the time from date of randomization to the first/earliest documented date of any of the following events:
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
EFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the earliest occurrence of treatment failure, confirmed lost of MMR, discontinuation due to AE, progression to AP/BC, and death from any cause.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest occurrence of progression to AP/BC or death from any cause.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
TTD is the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to lack of efficacy, treatment failure, disease progression, suboptimal response or death
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Change from baseline in Overall Scores and individual domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participant's experience over the past week. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale.
Time frame: approximately 7.5 years
Change from baseline in Overall Scores and individual domains of the EORTC QLQ-CML24. The EORTC QLQ-CML24 assesses specific concepts relevant to the experience of patients with CML. The QLQ-CML24 has 24 items which assess symptom burden, impact on daily life and on worry/mood, body image problems, and satisfaction with care and with social life based on the participant's experience over the past week.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Asciminib Versus Nilotinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Acronym: ASC4START
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06001385
Acute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06131801
ALL, AML
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02467270
Bone Marrow Diseases, Chronic Disease
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01758042
AL Amyloidosis, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details