Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03936777

A Study to Investigate the Long-Term Safety of ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride) Oral Solution in Children and Adults With Epileptic Encephalopathy Including Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

This is an international, multicenter, open-label, long-term safety study of ZX008 in subjects with Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or epileptic encephalopathy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Ep0215 301, Heidelberg, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is an international, multicenter, open-label, long-term safety study of ZX008 in patients with epileptic encephalopathy, including Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Subjects eligible for participation are those with Dravet syndrome who are currently enrolled in Study ZX008-1503, or those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome who have successfully completed Study ZX008-1601-Part 2, and are candidates for continued treatment with ZX008 for an extended period of time, or those with Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, or another epileptic encephalopathy who have completed participation in another Zogenix-sponsored study and have been invited to participate in this study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or nonpregnant, nonlactating female
  • Satisfactory completion of a core study
  • Has a rare seizure disorder, such as epileptic encephalopathy and has successfully completed another Zogenix-sponsored clinical trials with ZX008
  • Subject's caregiver is willing and able to be compliant with study procedures, visit schedule and study drug accountability

Exclusion criteria

  • Current cardiac valvulopathy or pulmonary hypertension that is clinically significant
  • Moderate or severe hepatic impairment
  • Receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin agonists, serotonin antagonists, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 14 days of receiving ZX008

Treatment and study plan

ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride)

Drug

Fenfluramine hydrochloride provided in a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: From First dose of ZX008 (in study EP0215 [ZX008-1900]) to Cardiac Follow-up after ZX008 treatment (Up to 6 Years, 17 Days)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as AE that began on or after the first day of treatment with ZX008 in Study EP0215 (ZX008-1900) (NCT03936777) or that occurred prior to first ZX008 treatment in Study EP0215 (ZX008-1900) but increased in severity after treatment in Study EP0215 (ZX008-1900) began. Events recorded at Follow-up/Cardiac Follow-up were considered treatment-emergent. The percentage of participants was rounded to one decimal place.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Global: Assessment by Parent/Caregiver

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Global function is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The global CGI-I assessment was conducted by the Parent/Caregiver. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  2. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Global: Assessment by Investigator

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Global function is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The global CGI-I assessment was conducted by the Investigator. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  3. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Cognition: Assessment by Parent/Caregiver

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Cognitive function is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of cognition was conducted by the Parent/Caregiver. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  4. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Behavior: Assessment by Parent/Caregiver

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Behavior is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of behavior was conducted by the Parent/Caregiver. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  5. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Motor Abilities: Assessment by Parent/Caregiver

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Motor abilities function is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of motor abilities was conducted by the Parent/Caregiver. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  6. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Cognition: Assessment by Investigator

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Cognitive function is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of cognition was conducted by the Investigator. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  7. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement in Participants, Subscale Behavior: Assessment by Investigator

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Behavior is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of behavior was conducted by the Investigator. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  8. Clinical Global Impression Improvement in Participants, Subscale Motor Abilities: Assessment by Investigator

    Time frame: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The CGI-I scale is used to assess the severity of illness and global improvement in patients. Motor abilities is one of the domains assessed by the CGI-I scale. The CGI-I is rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) as follows: 1=Very much improved; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change; 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse, where higher score indicates worse outcome. The CGI-I assessment of motor abilities was conducted by the Investigator. The number of participants in each of the 7 categories of the CGI-I for each visit is reported.

  9. Number of Participants With Improvement in Seizure Burden as Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, Last On-Treatment Visit (Up to Month 49)

    The change in seizure burden from the previous visit was assessed by the investigator using following categories: <25%, ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, 100% (i.e., seizure-free) improvement. Improvement in seizure burden at Baseline was based on comparison with the participant's last visit in the feeder studies (ZX008-1601, ZX008-1503, and ZX008-1602). Number of participants in each of the 5 categories is reported for each visit as compared to last visit.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zogenix, Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • Zogenix International Limited, Inc., a subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-Label Extension Trial to Assess the Long-Term Safety of ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride) Oral Solution as an Adjunctive Therapy for Seizures in Patients With Rare Seizure Disorders Such as Epileptic Encephalopathies Including Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 3, 2019
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.