Hôpital Kremlin-Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
NCT Number: NCT03368404
The primary objectives of this investigation were to show that the performance of CBL-102 Eye Drops is non-inferior to that of Vismed® Multi eye drops in subjects with moderate to severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca after 28 days, and to assess the safety of CBL-102 Eye Drops during a 90-day period with treatment administered 3 to 6 times per day.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel group, investigator-masked, non-inferiority study. Approximately 84 subjects were planned to be randomized in a 1:1 ratio.
The primary performance endpoint was the mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye at Day 28 in the Ocular surface fluorescein staining score as assessed by the Oxford Scheme.
Following a screening visit (Visit 1) and a 2-week washout with povidone 2% artificial tear (ART), participants were randomized on Day 0 (Visit 2) with follow-up visits on Day 28 ±3 (Visit 4) and Day 90 ±10 (Visit 5). A telephone assessment took place on Day 7 ±1 ('Visit 3') for safety and compliance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CBL-102 eye drops, 3 to 6 times per day for 3 months
Vismed Multi eye drops, 3 to 6 times per day for 3 months
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28)
Mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye in Ocular Surface Fluorescein Staining (OSFS) scored according to the Oxford Scheme.
The Oxford Scheme is a validated scale consisting of a series of panels labelled A to E in order of increasing severity. Grade 0 corresponds to panel A increasing to Grade 5 corresponding to more than Panel E, with punctate dots representing staining. The 3 regions, cornea, nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctiva are graded separately from 0 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome), with the Ocular Surface Fluorescein Score (OSFS) ranging from 0 (best outcome) to 15 (worst outcome). The OSFS is the sum score of the 3 sub-scores (corneal, nasal and temporal regions).
The study eye was the eligible eye with the highest OSFS score at baseline, which needed to be ≥4 and ≤9 on the 15-grade Oxford Scheme. If both eyes were eligible and had the same OSFS score, the study eye was the right eye.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 5 (Day 90)
Mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye in Ocular Surface Fluorescein Staining (OSFS) scored according to the Oxford Scheme.
The Oxford Scheme is a validated scale consisting of a series of panels labelled A to E in order of increasing severity. Grade 0 corresponds to panel A increasing to Grade 5 corresponding to more than Panel E, with punctate dots representing staining. The 3 regions, cornea, nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctiva are graded separately from 0 to 5, with the OSFS score ranging from 0 (best outcome) to 15 (worst outcome).
The study eye was the eligible eye with the highest OSFS score at baseline, which needed to be ≥4 and ≤9 on the 15-grade Oxford Scheme. If both eyes were eligible and had the same OSFS score, the study eye was the right eye.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28) and Visit 5 (Day 90)
Mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye in Corneal Fluorescein Staining (OSFS) scored according to the Oxford Scheme.
The Oxford Scheme is a validated scale consisting of a series of panels labelled A to E in order of increasing severity. Grade 0 corresponds to panel A increasing to Grade 5 corresponding to more than Panel E, with punctate dots representing staining. The Corneal Region is graded separately from 0 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28) and Visit 5 (Day 90)
Mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye in Nasal Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining scored according to the Oxford Scheme.
The Oxford Scheme is a validated scale consisting of a series of panels labelled A to E in order of increasing severity. Grade 0 corresponds to panel A increasing to Grade 5 corresponding to more than Panel E, with punctate dots representing staining. The Nasal conjunctival region is graded separately from 0 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28), Visit 5 (Day 90)
Mean change from baseline (CFB) in the study eye in Temporal Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining scored according to the Oxford Scheme.
The Oxford Scheme is a validated scale consisting of a series of panels labelled A to E in order of increasing severity. Grade 0 corresponds to panel A increasing to Grade 5 corresponding to more than Panel E, with punctate dots representing staining. The Temporal Conjunctival region is graded separately from 0 (best outcome) to 5 (worst outcome).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28) and Visit 5 (Day 90)
The global sum score (scale 0-28) of dry eye symptoms assessed 7 items: sensation of dryness, foreign body, burning, stinging, itching, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, each graded from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe and/or disabling and constant).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 5 (Day 90)
The OSD-QoL® questionnaire is a validated instrument for measuring dry eye severity and impairment. It includes 28 items divided into 7 dimensions: Daily activities, Difficulties with work and handicap, Giving up makeup, Acknowledgement of the disease, Acceptance of the disease, Fear for the future, and Emotional well-being. A Global Question: "How do you feel when considering your eye problems?" (included in the Fear for the future dimension) is also evaluated separately. The converted score for each dimension ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score reflecting a better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28), Visit 5 (Day 90)
The Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT) after fluorescein instillation, measured the time between the last blink and the first appearance of a dry spot or disruption of the tear film. The TFBUT was measured in tenth of seconds with a stopwatch provided to the sites. It was conducted 3 times and the means was calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Visit 4 (Day 28)
Tear fluid secretion was assessed by the un-anaesthetized Schirmer test in the study eye with graduated strips in millimeters.
Schirmer paper test strips were carefully inserted over the lower eyelid margin. The strips were removed after 5 minutes and the amount of tear fluid secretion ready to the nearest mm from the graduated strip margins.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 90, an average of 3 months
Mean daily frequency of investigational eye drop instillations as reported in participant's diary
Laboratoire Chauvin
Industry
Acronym: RESTA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07089511
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06346340
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Laguna Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07675460
Acne Cystic, Choroidal Thickness
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04418999
Allergy, Corneal Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details