Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01606176

A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Cannabis Based Medicine in Patients With Pain of Neurological Origin

To investigate the ability of a cannabis based medicine extract to relieve chronic refractory pain of neurological origin.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Pain Autoimmune Diseases Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Demyelinating Diseases Immune System Diseases Multiple Sclerosis Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

James Paget Hospital

Norfolk, NR31 6LA, United Kingdom

About this study

Patients with Multiple Sclerosis or other defect of neurological function with a qualifying symptom of chronic refractory pain, entered a seven day baseline period, followed by a 21 day randomised, double blind, parallel group comparison of GW-1000-02 with placebo, self-titrated to symptom resolution or maximum tolerated dose. The ability of the cannabis based medicine extract to relieve chronic refractory pain was assessed by the change from baseline in pain score using Box Scale-11 (BS-11) scores recorded in the patients' daily diary.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient, or legal representative, willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with chronic refractory pain due to Multiple Sclerosis or other defects of neurological function.
  • Diagnosed with pain, not wholly alleviated with current analgesic therapy at Visit 1 and an average score of over 4 on a Box Scale-11 scale on the four consecutive days leading up to Visit 2, where: zero = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain".
  • Stable dose of pain relieving medication for at least two weeks prior to study entry.
  • Willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter (applicable to female patients of child bearing potential and male patients whose partners were of child bearing potential).
  • No cannabinoid use (cannabis, Marinol or Nabilone) for at least seven days before Visit 1 and be willing to abstain from any use of cannabis during the study.
  • Able (in the investigator's opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Willing for his or her name to be notified to the Home Office for participation in this study.
  • Willing to allow his or her general practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition.
  • Known history of alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Severe cardiovascular disorder, such as ischaemic heart disease, arrhythmias (other than well controlled atrial fibrillation), poorly controlled hypertension or severe heart failure.
  • History of epilepsy.
  • Female patients who were pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
  • Significant renal or hepatic impairment.
  • Scheduled elective surgery or other procedures requiring general anaesthesia during the study.
  • Terminally ill or inappropriate for placebo medication.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may have put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, or may have influenced the result of the study, or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • Regular levodopa (Sinemet®, Sinemet Plus®, Levodopa, L-dopa, Madopar®, Benserazide) therapy within seven days of study entry.
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the study medications.
  • Known or suspected of having adverse reaction to cannabinoids.
  • Travel outside the UK planned during the study.
  • Donation of blood during the study.
  • Patients who had participated in another research study in the 12 weeks leading up to study entry.
  • Patients who had been previously randomised into this study.
  • Male patients who were receiving Sildenafil (Viagra®) at the time of study entry and were unwilling to stop medication for the duration of the study.

Treatment and study plan

GW-1000-02

Drug

Each actuation of GW-1000-02 (100 μl) delivered a dose containing 2.5 mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5 mg cannabidiol (CBD). The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period (20 mg THC/20 mg CBD) and 48 actuations in any 24 hour period (120 mg THC/120 mg CBD).

Other names: Sativex

Placebo

Drug

Each actuation of placebo (100 μl) delivered the excipients only. The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations in any 24 hour period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Box Scale-11 Score at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    Each day, in the morning (on waking), at lunchtime and in the evening (just before going to bed), patients recorded in their patient diary their level of pain using a Box Scale-11 pain score ranging from zero "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain". Week 3 analysis was defined as the mean of the last seven days in the study. The last day was taken as the last day with complete diary card pain data that occurred on or before the last day the patient took study medication. A negative value from baseline indicates and improvement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use of Analgesic Escape Medication.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The percentage of days on treatment on which escape medication was used is presented.

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Disturbance Score at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    Each day patients were asked to record in their patient diary, whether or not they were woken due to pain the previous night. Answers were recorded as "No", "Once", "Twice", "More than twice" and "Awake most of the night"; these were converted to a five point scale, zero to four, respectively. Sleep disturbance was summarised and analysed in the same manner as the analysis of the primary efficacy parameter of Box Scale-11 pain score. A negative value from baseline indicates and improvement.

  3. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Pain Disability Index Score at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The index consists of seven assessments of pain (representing different aspects) with each assessment scored on a zero "no disability" to 10 "total disability" scale. The total Pain Disability Index was calculated as the un-weighted sum of the seven pain scores; if one or more of the pain scores were missing then the total Pain Disability Index was set to missing. A reduction in score from baseline indicates and improvement.

  4. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) Score at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A reduction in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

  5. Change From Baseline in Mean Spitzer Quality of Life Index Scores at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Spitzer Quality of Life Index questionnaire consists of five sections, relating to activity, daily living, health, support and outlook. Each section has three choices (numbered 1, 2 and 3) and the patient was required to choose the one that best described their quality of life during the last week. Choice 1 is scored two, Choice 2 is scored one and Choice 3 is scored zero. The total Spitzer Quality of Life Index was calculated as the unweighted sum of the five scores. A reduction in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

  6. Patient Global Impression of Change at the End of 3 Weeks of Treatment.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Patient Global Impression of Change consisted of a single question relating to improvement in overall condition since the start of the study. The results were recorded as "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved", "Minimally Improved", "No Change", "Minimally Worse", "Much Worse" and "Very Much Worse" and were converted to a seven point scale ranging from one to seven, respectively. The number of patients who reported being "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" is presented.

  7. Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Box Scale-11 Scores (Multiple Sclerosis Subset) at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    Each day, in the morning (on waking), at lunchtime and in the evening (just before going to bed), patients recorded in their patient diary their level of pain using a Box Scale-11 pain score ranging from zero "no pain" to 10 "worst possible pain". Week 3 analysis was defined as the mean of the last seven days in the study. The last day was taken as the last day with complete diary card pain data that occurred on or before the last day the patient took study medication. A negative value from baseline indicates and improvement.

  8. Use of Analgesic Escape Medication - Multiple Sclerosis Subset.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The percentage of days on treatment on which escape medication was used is presented.

  9. Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Disturbance Scores (Multiple Sclerosis Subset) at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    Each day patients were asked to record in their patient diary, whether or not they were woken due to pain the previous night. Answers were recorded as "No", "Once", "Twice", "More than twice" and "Awake most of the night"; these were converted to a five point scale, zero to four, respectively. Sleep disturbance was summarised and analysed in the same manner as the analysis of the primary efficacy parameter of Box Scale-11 pain score. A negative value from baseline indicates and improvement.

  10. Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Disability Index Scores at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The index consists of seven assessments of pain (representing different aspects) with each assessment scored on a zero "no disability" to 10 "total disability" scale. The total Pain Disability Index was calculated as the un-weighted sum of the seven pain scores; if one or more of the pain scores were missing then the total Pain Disability Index was set to missing. A reduction in score from baseline indicates and improvement.

  11. Change From Baseline in Mean Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) Scores (Multiple Sclerosis Subset) at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form) is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items (range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A reduction in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

  12. Change From Baseline in Mean Spitzer Quality of Life Index Scores (Multiple Sclerosis Subset) at 3 Weeks.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Spitzer Quality of Life Index questionnaire consists of five sections, relating to activity, daily living, health, support and outlook. Each section has three choices (numbered 1, 2 and 3) and the patient was required to choose the one that best described their quality of life during the last week. Choice 1 is scored two, Choice 2 is scored one and Choice 3 is scored zero. The total Spitzer Quality of Life Index was calculated as the unweighted sum of the five scores. A reduction in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

  13. Patient Global Impression of Change - Multiple Sclerosis Subset.

    Time frame: 0 - 3 weeks

    The Patient Global Impression of Change consisted of a single question relating to improvement in overall condition since the start of the study. The results were recorded as "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved", "Minimally Improved", "No Change", "Minimally Worse", "Much Worse" and "Very Much Worse" and were converted to a seven point scale ranging from one to seven, respectively. The number of patients who reported being "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" is presented.

  14. Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safety.

    Time frame: 0 - 65 days

    The number of patients who experienced an adverse event in the study is presented.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi Centre Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Comparison of the Effects of Cannabis Based Medicine Standardised Extracts Over 4 Weeks, in Patients With Chronic Refractory Pain Due to Multiple Sclerosis or Other Defects of Neurological Function.

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2002
Study completion
2002
First posted
May 25, 2012
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.