Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT01606137
Subjects who had previously received GW-1000-02 in a GW study who opted to continue using it in the long-term were monitored for ongoing tolerability and evidence of clinical benefit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Glasgow, G12 0YN, United Kingdom
Subjects who had previously participated in a placebo controlled GW clinical study were screened and if eligible began dosing with GW-1000-02. Subjects were reviewed for tolerability and evidence of clinical benefit at weeks two and four and then every eight weeks. Subjects self-titrated to symptom resolution or maximum tolerated/allowable dose of 130 mg THC and 120 mg CBD.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 mg/ml) and cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/ml) as extract of Cannabis sativa L., with peppermint oil, 0.05% (v/v), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipient. Each 100 μl actuation of the pump action spray delivered 2.7 mg THC and 2.5 mg CBD. A maximum daily exposure of 130 mg THC was specified by the UK regulatory authority authorisation.
Other names: Sativex
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Following data entry, all adverse events were medically encoded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 6.0. All subjects who experienced an adverse event during the treatment period is presented.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: 0 - 52 weeks.
Subjects were asked to rate the severity of their primary symptom each week in the diary using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where zero = "best possible" and 10 = "worst possible". A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the subject, and the number of subjects who perceived a benefit from treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Assessment of benefit achieved at study completion/withdrawal was evaluated by the investigator, and the number of subjects that investigators considered to have experienced a benefit from the treatment is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Time frame: Up to 1051 days.
Investigators rated the global severity of the subject's underlying primary condition, e.g. their MS or spinal cord injury, since the previous visit using a five point scale of "much worse", "worse", "no change", "better", "much better". The number of subjects rated by the investigator as "better" or "much better" at the last study visit is presented.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Long-term, Open Label, Safety and Tolerability Study of Cannabis Based Medicine Extract in Patients Who Have Participated in a GW Clinical Study Using Cannabis Based Medicine.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06782464
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Luxembourg
View Trial DetailsNCT07123272
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05326711
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Izmir, Inciralti, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00681538
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Cliftonville, Northampton, United Kingdom
View Trial Details