Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04800315

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Cendakimab (CC-93538) in Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 3 dose regimen of CC-93538 in adult participants with moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Institute for Skin Advancement, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

  • Participant must be ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years of age and have a body weight of ≥ 40 kg (88.2 lb) at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Participant has chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) as defined by Hanifin and Rajka that has been present for ≥ 1 year prior to the baseline visit (Day 1).
  • Participant has moderate to severe, active, and symptomatic AD defined by meeting all of the following criteria on the day of the baseline visit (Day 1):
  • Body Surface Area (BSA) ≥ 10%, and
  • EASI score ≥ 16, and
  • vIGA-AD ≥ 3, and
  • Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) severity score ≥ 4.
  • Participant must have a documented history of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications for at least 4 weeks, unless topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable or has required systemic therapy for control of disease.
  • Participant must be willing to apply a stable dose of topical emollient (eg, over-the-counter moisturizer, non-medicated emollient, etc.) twice daily for ≥ 7 days prior to the Baseline visit and continue application throughout the study.
  • Participant must commit to avoid prolonged exposure to the sun and not to use tanning booths, sun lamps or other ultraviolet light sources during the study.
  • Participants currently receiving concomitant medications for any reason other than AD, such as inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists (eg, montelukast), or mast cell stabilizers (eg, cromolyn sodium) for asthma, must be on a stable regimen, which is defined as not starting a new drug, changing, or stopping dosage within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to Day 1 and through the treatment duration of the study.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must agree to practice a highly effective method of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

  • The presence of any of the following will exclude a participant from enrollment: Evidence of an active and/or concurrent inflammatory skin condition (eg, seborrheic dermatitis, psoriasis, acute allergic contact dermatitis, etc.) that would interfere with the Investigator or participant-driven evaluations of AD.
  • Evidence of acute AD flare between the Screening and Baseline/ Randomization (eg, doubling of the EASI score between Screening and Baseline).
  • Use of topical treatments that could affect the assessment of AD (eg, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, tars, antibiotic creams, topical antihistamines) within 7 days of the Day 1 visit.
  • Received phototherapy narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) or broad band phototherapy within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.
  • Evidence of immunosuppression, participant is receiving, or has received systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating drugs (eg, azathioprine, cyclosporine, systemic corticosteroids, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), Janus kinase inhibitors, methotrexate, mycophenolate-mofetil, etc.) within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline visit.
  • Treatment with immunomodulatory biologics
  • Concurrent treatment with another IP
  • Received a live attenuated vaccine within 1 month prior to the first Screening Visit or anticipates the need to be vaccinated with a live attenuated vaccine during the study.
  • Active parasitic/helminthic infection or a suspected parasitic/helminthic infection.
  • Ongoing infection
  • A history of idiopathic anaphylaxis or a major immunologic reaction (such as anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactoid reaction, or serum sickness) to an immunoglobulin G (IgG) containing agent. A known hypersensitivity to any ingredient in the investigational product (IP) is also exclusionary.

Treatment and study plan

CC-93538

Drug

Specified dosages on specified days

Other names: RPC4064, cendakimab

Placebo

Other

Specified dosages on specified days

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in EASI at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial EASI measurement to week 16

    The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a composite scoring system assessed by the Investigator based on the proportion of each of the 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk) affected with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and the intensity of each of 4 main signs of AD (eg, erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) and is based on a 4-point scale of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). The sum of the scores is totaled (0 to 72), the lower the score the better.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responders With an vIGA-AD Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) and a Reduction ≥ 2 Points From Baseline at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial vIGA-AD assessment to week 16

    The Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) is a validated 5-point assessment intended to assess the global severities of key acute clinical signs of AD, including erythema, induration/papulation, oozing/crusting (lichenification excluded). The rating of clear (0), almost clear (1), mild (2), moderate (3) and severe (4), will be assessed at scheduled visits. The vIGA-AD must be conducted before the EASI assessment. The vIGA-AD is a static evaluation conducted without regard to the score obtained at a previous visit.

    Percentage of responders calculated using Multiple Imputation (MI) approach.

    For participants discontinued study drug, whose vIGA-AD response at Week 16 are missing or cannot be adequately determined (including missing due to COVID-19) without use of rescue therapy/prohibited medication prior to Week 16, their outcomes will be handled using a MI approach assuming missing at random (MAR).

  2. Percentage of EASI-75 Responders at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial EASI measurement to week 16

    The EASI is a composite scoring system assessed by the Investigator based on the proportion of each of the 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk) affected with AD and the intensity of each of 4 main signs of AD (eg, erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) and is based on a 4-point scale of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). The sum of the scores is totaled (0 to 72), the lower the score the better.

    Percentage of responders calculated using Multiple Imputation (MI) approach.

    For participants discontinued study drug, whose EASI-75 response at Week 16 are missing or cannot be adequately determined (including missing due to COVID-19) without use of rescue therapy/prohibited medication prior to Week 16, their outcomes will be handled using a MI approach assuming missing at random (MAR).

  3. Percentage of EASI-90 Responders at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial EASI measurement to week 16

    The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a composite scoring system assessed by the Investigator based on the proportion of each of the 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk) affected with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and the intensity of each of 4 main signs of AD (eg, erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) and is based on a 4-point scale of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). The sum of the scores is totaled (0 to 72), the lower the score the better.

    Percentage of responders calculated using Multiple Imputation (MI) approach.

    For participants discontinued study drug, whose EASI-90 response at Week 16 are missing or cannot be adequately determined (including missing due to COVID-19) without use of rescue therapy/prohibited medication prior to Week 16, their outcomes will be handled using a MI approach assuming missing at random (MAR).

  4. Percent Change in Mean SCORAD Scores From Baseline at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial SCORAD measurement to week 16

    The SCORAD is a validated scoring index for atopic dermatitis, which combines extent (0 to 100), severity (0 to 18), and subjective symptoms (0 to 20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0 to 10). The subject will assess the subjective symptoms (itch and sleepless) part of the assessment.

    SCORing Atopic Dermatitis Index (SCORAD) score ranges from 0 to 103, higher scores indicate more severe disease.

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Pruritus NRS at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial NRS measurement to week 16

    Pruritus will be assessed by the subject using the Pruritus NRS, which was developed and validated as a single item, patient reported outcome (PRO) of itch severity. Clinical response is indicated by a ≥ 2 to 4-point change from baseline in Peak Pruritus NRS score. The intensity of pruritus will be assessed based on last 24 hours using a validated 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 ("no pruritus") to 10 ("the worst pruritus imaginable").

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Response and Pruritus NRS Change of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial NRS assessment to week 16

    Pruritus will be assessed by the subject using the Pruritus NRS, which was developed and validated as a single item, patient reported outcome (PRO) of itch severity. Clinical response is indicated by a ≥ 2 to 4-point change from baseline in Peak Pruritus NRS score. The intensity of pruritus will be assessed based on last 24 hours using a validated 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 ("no pruritus") to 10 ("the worst pruritus imaginable").

    Percentage of responders calculated using Multiple Imputation (MI) approach.

    For participants discontinued study drug, whose pruritus NRS response at Week 16 are missing or cannot be adequately determined (including missing due to COVID-19) without use of rescue therapy/prohibited medication prior to Week 16, their outcomes will be handled using a MI approach assuming missing at random (MAR).

  7. Time to Achieve at Least 4 Points of Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRS Scale.

    Time frame: From initial NRS pruritus response up to study day 127 (127 days)

    Pruritus will be assessed by the subject using the Pruritus NRS, which was developed and validated as a single item, patient reported outcome (PRO) of itch severity. Clinical response is indicated by a ≥ 2 to 4-point change from baseline in Peak Pruritus NRS score. The intensity of pruritus will be assessed based on last 24 hours using a validated 11-point NRS, ranging from 0 ("no pruritus") to 10 ("the worst pruritus imaginable").

  8. Adjust Mean Percentage Change in BSA in Atopic Dermatitis From Baseline at Week 16

    Time frame: From initial BSA assessment to week 16

    Body Surface Area involvement will be calculated from the sum of the number of handprints of skin afflicted with atopic dermatitis in a body region. The number of handprints of skin afflicted with atopic dermatitis in a body region can be used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region is involved with AD. When measuring, the handprint unit refers to the size of each individual subject's hand with fingers in a closed position. BSA will be calculated by the Investigator or qualified designee using the 1% handprint rule, in which the area represented by the palm with all 5 digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA.

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: From first treatment to the end of follow up, approximately 32 weeks

    Treatment emergent adverse events

  10. Number of Participants With the Presence of Serum Antibodies to CC-93538

    Time frame: From first treatment to the end of follow up, approximately 32 weeks

  11. Serum Trough Concentration at Week 16

    Time frame: At week 16

    A serum trough concentration (Ctrough) is the concentration reached by a drug immediately before the next dose is administered. Serum trough concentrations (Ctrough) of CC-93538 will be summarized with descriptive statistics by treatment and visit.

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

    Time frame: From first treatment to the end of follow up, approximately 32 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Celgene

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Global, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cendakimab (CC-93538) in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 16, 2021
Registry last updated
Jan 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.