Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04664959

A Study to Compare SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) to Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

This is a randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of SB16 compared to Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

55 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

SB Investigative Site, Krakow, Poland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SB16 or Prolia®. At Month 12, subjects in Prolia® treatment group will be randomised again in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® treatment or be transitioned to SB16 treatment. Investigational product (60 mg in 1 mL of SB16 or Prolia®) will be given subcutaneously every 6 months up to Month 12, and the last assessment will be done at Month 18.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Postmenopausal women who are 55 to 80 years of age at Screening
  • Ambulatory and visually unimpaired to participate in the study at Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Absolute BMD consistent with T-score at the total hip or lumbar spine of -4 and -2.5 at Screening
  • At least three evaluable vertebrae within L1 to L4, one evaluable femoral neck, and one evaluable hip joint for BMD measurement at Screening
  • Biologic naïve at Screening
  • Body weight of 50 kg and 90 kg at Screening

Exclusion criteria

  • One severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures on spinal X-ray according to Genant classification at Screening
  • History of hip fracture or bilateral hip replacement at Screening
  • Uncorrected vitamin D deficiency at Screening
  • Hypercalcemia or hypocalcaemia at Screening
  • Inadequate haematological function at Screening
  • Inadequate renal or hepatic function at Screening
  • Known allergic reactions, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to denosumab or to any ingredients of the IP, including latex allergy or hereditary problems of fructose intolerance at Screening
  • May not tolerate long-term calcium or vitamin D supplementation or subject with malabsorption of calcium or vitamin D supplements, in the opinion of the Investigator, at Screening
  • Use of any of the medications that can affect BMD
  • Use of any non-biologic IP that is not indicated for osteoporosis from another study or use of an investigational device at Screening
  • Non-osteoporosis medical conditions that can affect BMD at Screening
  • Any clinically significant disease or disorder or laboratory abnormality which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from completing the study or the interpretation of the study results at Screening and Randomisation

Treatment and study plan

SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar)

Drug

Subjects randomised into SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

At Month 12, subjects transited from Prolia® group to SB16 group will receive SB16 (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously.

Prolia® (Denosumab)

Drug

Subjects randomised into Prolia® group will receive Prolia® (60 mg in 1 mL) subcutaneously every 6 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunogenicity Between SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.