ENZ215
BiologicalEnrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive ENZ215 (60mg)
NCT Number: NCT05405725
The Study will be conducted to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.
The primary goal for the study is
1. To evaluate the efficacy of ENZ215 when compared to Prolia® in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, in terms of change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline to Month 12 and 2. To compare the AUEC of sCTX levels from baseline to Month 6
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year–85 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
The study will be divided into three periods: Screening period: up to 35 days; Double-blind treatment period of 12 months; and Open-label, switch-over period of six months.
Five hundred four (504) patients (252 patients in each treatment arm) will be enrolled in this study. All eligible patients will be randomized in the double blind treatment period in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1 and Month 6. These participants will complete study at 12 months. A PK sub-study will be conducted in a subset of 120 participants with 60 participants in each arm.
A subset of 120 participants randomised to Prolia arm and who completed 12 months of the double-blind treatment period without any significant safety concerns per the Investigator's discretion will be offered to enroll in the open-label, switch-over extension period. After re-consenting for the open-label, switch-over study, the participants will be re-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ENZ215 or Prolia® (60 mg) SC at Month 12. These participants will complete the study at Month 18.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Note: Please refer to Section 6.11 for a comprehensive list of prohibited medications
i. History of cardiac arrhythmia or long QT syndrome or ECG abnormalities at screening indicating significant risk for safety (e.g., that required hospitalization, emergency cardioversion, or defibrillation) ii. History and/or presence of myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening iii. History and/or presence of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive ENZ215 (60mg)
Enrolled women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receive Prolia
Time frame: Month 12
The percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4 region) measured by DXA from baseline to month 12 and the mean (±SD) percentage change over time is displayed for the ITT set.
The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study intervention in the double-blind treatment period. In the ITT analysis set, treatment was assigned based on the study intervention to which participants were randomised, regardless of which treatment they actually received.
Time frame: Month 6
The AUEC of %CfB in sCTX of ENZ215 was assessed as part of pharmacodynamics assessment to compare with Prolia® in female participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis. This outcome measure was assessed for initial 6 months
Time frame: From Baseline to Month 12 for Double blind treatment period and to month 18 for Open label switchover treatment period
ADAs incidence such as ADA positive, ADA negative, NAB positive, NAB negative assessed at baseline and different timepoints from 1 month to 12 months and during open-label switch over period assessed. Subjects were considered as post-treatment ADA and NAb positive if they had at least one "Positive" ADA and NAb result after the first drug exposure. Post-treatment ADA and NAb status was determined regardless of the results at pre-dose.
Time frame: 12 months
Comparison of PK parameters of ENZ215 and Prolia over 12 months
Time frame: Month 6
Percent change from baseline in type 1 N-terminal propeptide (sP1NP) levels at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Percentage change in BMD at lumbar spine measured by DXA from baseline at month 6
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12
Percentage change in BMD at total hip and femoral neck measured by DXA from baseline to Month to predefined timepoint
Enzene Biosciences Ltd.
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of Enzene Denosumab (ENZ215) and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07685392
Accidental Falls, Aged, Exercise Movement Techniques, Bone Diseases
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT06079476
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT05630768
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04431960
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Storrs, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details