Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01313728

A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products

This study is to see if there's any difference in the amount of facial irritation when two acne products are used together on one side of the face, compared to one acne treatment product used alone on the other side of the face. All people participating in this trial will be required to return to the same study center every weekday for two weeks for the investigator to check for irritation on the face and to have the products applied - on weekends they will have to put them on at home. If one side of the face is more irritated than the other side, a picture will be taken as well.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Skin Study Center

Broomall, Pennsylvania, 19008, United States

About this study

This is an investigator-blind, randomized, balanced study comparing two treatment regimens in a split-face model. All subjects will apply Retin-A Micro Gel (tretinoin) 0.1 % Pump, and Aczone Gel (dapsone) 5% daily to one side of the face (with 1 hour between applications, applying Aczone Gel first) and Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1 % Pump to the other side of the face in a randomized scheme for two consecutive weeks. Subjects will return to the study center daily for evaluation and for application of both products (weekend applications will be done at home). At each visit the subject will be evaluated and scored for irritation and cutaneous treatment effects. Subjects presenting with differences in irritation between one side of the face and the other will be photographed and have chromometer readings taken. A single treatment center is expected to enroll at least 24 subjects.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator
  • Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start
  • Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study
  • If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study
  • Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions
  • Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents

Treatment and study plan

Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel

Drug

Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks

Other names: Aczone Gel 5% plus Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump

Tretinoin gel

Drug

Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks

Other names: Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump

Primary outcomes

  1. Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

  2. Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    Ordinal burning/stinging scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

  2. Subject Assessment - Itching

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    Ordinal itching scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

  3. Subject Assessment - Tightness

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    Ordinal tightness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

  4. Facial Tolerance

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 Weeks

    All interval measurements were combined for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Facial tolerance is the sum of scores from Erythema, Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Itching, and Tightness assessments, reported in Outcome Measures 1-5. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 6250 (highest possible combined score of 25, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Investigator-Blind, Phase 4 Study Assessing Mitigation of Facial Irritation When Comparing the Use of Two Acne Treatment Products (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump and Aczone®) With One Treatment Product (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump) Using a Split-Face Model

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2011
First posted
Mar 14, 2011
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.