Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00665223

A Study of Treatment With Pridopidine (ACR16) in Participants With Huntington's Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine if ACR16 is effective and safe in the symptomatic treatment of Huntington's disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

LKH -Univ. Klinikum Graz, Universitaetsklinik fur Psychiatrie Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The primary objective in the present study is to confirm whether ACR16 is efficacious in improving voluntary motor function in Huntington's disease based on the Unified Huntington"s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) subscale. These symptoms seem to be most important for the functional disability associated with the disorder. To achieve this, participants are randomized to ACR16 45 mg once daily, ACR16 45 mg twice daily, or placebo treatment in equal proportions in a parallel design for a treatment duration of 26 weeks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedure.
  • Huntington's disease diagnosed with the aid of clinical features and a positive family history and/or the presence of ≥ 36 CAG repeats in the Huntington gene.
  • Male or female age ≥ 30 years.
  • Willing and able to take oral medication and able to comply with the study specific procedures.
  • Ambulatory, being able to travel to the assessment centre, and judged by the Investigator as likely to be able to continue to travel for the duration of the study.
  • Availability of a caregiver or family member to accompany the participant.
  • A sum of ≥ 10 points on the mMS at the screening visit.
  • For participants taking allowed antipsychotic medication, the dosing of medication must have been kept constant for at least 6 weeks before randomization. The allowed antipsychotic medication is Amisulpride, Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Risperidone, Sulpiride, or Tiapride.
  • For participants taking allowed antidepressant or other psychotropic medication, the dosing of medication must have been kept constant for at least 6 weeks before randomization.
  • Willing to provide a blood sample for CAG analysis (where CAG result is not already available).
  • In France only, the participant must be affiliated to a social security system or be a beneficiary of such a system.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to give written informed consent.
  • Treatment with any non-allowed antipsychotic medication within 12 weeks of randomization. The non-allowed antipsychotic medication is any medication other than Amisulpride, Haloperidol, Olanzapine, Risperidone, Sulpiride, or Tiapride.
  • Treatment with the antidepressants Fluoxetine or Paroxetine within 6 weeks of randomization.
  • Use of Tetrabenazine within 12 weeks of randomization, or at any time during the study period.
  • Treatment with any investigational product within 4 weeks of randomization.
  • Use of tricyclic antidepressants, class I antiarrhythmics, and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors such as Ajmalicine, Chinidin/Quinidine and Ritonavir, within 6 weeks of randomization.
  • Participants previously included into this study.
  • A prolonged QTc interval at screen (defined as a QTc interval of > 450 milliseconds [msec] for males or > 470 msec for females), or other clinically significant heart conditions.
  • Creatinine clearance <40 milliliters (mL)/minute (min) as measured at the screening visit.
  • Any clinically significant, abnormal, baseline laboratory result which in the opinion of the Investigator, affects the participants' suitability for the study or puts the participant at risk if he/she enters the study.
  • Clinically significant hepatic or renal impairment.
  • Participants with a history of epilepsy or a history of seizure(s) of unknown cause.
  • Severe intercurrent illness, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may put the participant at risk when participating in the trial or may influence the results of the trial or affect the participants' ability to take part in the trial.
  • Alcohol and/or drug abuse as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - Fourth Edition - Text Revision (DSM IV-TR) criteria for substance abuse - this includes the illicit use of cannabis within the last 12 months.
  • Participants with suicidal ideation, defined as a positive score on criteria for major depressive episode, item A9 on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a Major Depressive Episode.
  • Females who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Females who are of child bearing potential and not taking adequate contraceptive precautions are excluded from the trial. Females of child bearing potential taking acceptable contraceptive precautions can be included.
  • Known allergy to any ingredients of the trial medication or placebo.
  • Any previous participation in a clinical study with ACR16.
  • Participants currently receiving deep brain stimulation.
  • Participants with a history of surgical procedures aiming to improve the symptoms of Huntington's disease, such as neural transplantations, lesions of the central nervous system, infusions of neurotrophic agents or previous attempts of deep brain stimulation.

Treatment and study plan

ACR16

Drug

Capsules will be swallowed whole with water.

Other names: Pridopidine

Placebo

Drug

Capsules will be swallowed whole with water.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Modified Motor Score (mMS) (Sum of Score of Items 4-10 and 13-15 of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale [UHDRS] Motor Assessments) at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    The mMS is a subscale of the UHDRS total motor score and comprises 13 responses from the 10 items, 4-10 and 13-15, from the UHDRS motor assessment. The items for mMS include dysarthria, tongue protrusion, finger taps (right and left), pronate/supinate hands (right and left), luria - first-hand-palm sequencing, arms rigidity (right and left), body bradykinesia, gait, tandem walking, and retropulsion pull test. Each of these items are rated on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (marked impairment). Total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The UHDRS Functional Assessment at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    The UHDRS Functional Assessment considers 25 items associated with functional problems. The participant scores 1 point for every item to which they respond positively (zero points for negative responses). Total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 25 (best). Higher scores indicate better functional ability.

  2. Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

    Time frame: Week 26

    Global improvement is rated by the investigator on a 7-point scale as: 1 = Very much improved; 2 = Much improved; 3 = Minimally improved; 4 = No change; 5 = Minimally worse; 6 = Much worse; and 7 = Very much worse.

  3. Change From Baseline in Stroop Word Reading Test at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    The Stroop test measures the ability to concentrate and ward off distractions. The test consists of three items: (i) colour naming; (ii) word reading; (iii) interference. The word reading test requires participants to read colour words written in black and each response is scored as the number of correct answers made in 45 seconds. Higher scores indicate less severe disease, and an increase in score represents an improvement.

  4. Change From Baseline in Total UHDRS Behavioral Assessment Score at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    The total behavioral assessment score is the sum of the 11 products (depressed mood, apathy, low self-esteem/guilt, compulsive behavior, anxiety, irritable behavior, perseverative/obsessive thinking, disruptive/aggressive behavior, suicidal thoughts, delusions, and hallucinations) of frequency and severity symptom scores and excluded the 3 yes/no questions relating to confusion, dementia, and depression. Frequency is rated on a scale of 0 (never or almost never) to 4 (very frequently, most of the time). Severity is rated on a scale of 0 (no evidence) to 4 (severe). Total behavior score ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 88 (severe impairment), with higher scores indicating greater behavioral impairments.

  5. Change From Baseline in Total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    HADS is a self-administered instrument reliable for detecting states of depression and anxiety. It includes 2 subscales: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - anxiety (HADS-A) assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression (HADS-D) assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale is comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score ranges from 0 to 21 for each subscale where higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. The total HADS score was a composite score summed of all 14 items for a total range of 0 to 42. Lower change from baseline scores indicate improvement.

  6. Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 30

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any change from the participant's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, other than improvement, that did not necessarily have causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs were defined as AEs that began after ACR16/placebo administration through week 26 or up to week 30 for participants not continuing in the open-label period. AEs included both serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

  7. Open-label Phase: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    Time frame: Week 26 up to Week 56

    An AE was defined as any change from the participant's baseline (pre-treatment) condition, other than improvement, that did not necessarily have causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that began after ACR16/placebo administration through Week 56. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicentre, Multinational, Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Comparing ACR16 45 mg Once-Daily or Twice-Daily Versus Placebo for the Symptomatic Treatment of Huntington's Disease

Acronym: MermaiHD

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Apr 23, 2008
Registry last updated
Aug 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.