University of Cambridge
Cambridge, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04715555
--- Background and study aim
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heart rhythm which causes a five-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Approximately one in ten people aged over 70 have AF. If AF is recognised then the risk of stroke can be reduced by taking tablets regularly. AF can be difficult to recognise as it can occur without symptoms and only intermittently. Consequently, AF is not recognised in many people, meaning they live with an increased risk of stroke. Therefore, it is important to find ways to identify AF more reliably.
Recently, wearable devices have been developed which could be useful for identifying AF. Several devices can monitor heart activity in daily life, including wristbands, smart watches and chest patch monitors. The aim of this study is to assess the acceptability and performance of wearables for use in AF screening in older adults.
The primary objective is to determine the feasibility of measuring inter-beat-intervals using a wristband. The secondary objectives are:
(i) to determine the acceptability of wearables; (ii) to determine the acceptability of the screening approach; (iii) to assess the performance of wearables for acquiring signals; (iv) to assess the performance of signal processing algorithms; and (v) to assess the performance of wearables for AF screening.
--- Who can participate?
Selected people who have previously participated in the SAFER Programme can participate in this study. The Investigators will invite previous SAFER Programme participants to also participate in this study, aiming to enrol 65 without AF, and 65 with AF.
--- What does the study involve?
Participants will be asked to wear three devices for seven days: Two wristbands (like watches), and one chest patch (like a plaster). These devices will collect measurements of their heart's activity. The Investigators will also ask participants to tell them how they found wearing the devices by completing a questionnaire. The Investigators will compare how participants found wearing each device, and how accurately each device identifies AF.
--- What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There will be no direct benefit to participants, although this research is intended to benefit future patients like them. Some participants may experience irritation or redness whilst wearing a chest patch - participants will be advised that if this occurs then they should remove it straightaway.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Cambridge, United Kingdom
--- Where is the study run from?
The University of Cambridge.
--- Study procedures
Participants will be asked to:
Participants will be given an instruction leaflet with further details of each step.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Continuous monitoring using a wearable, single-lead electrocardiography (ECG) device affixed to the chest.
Intermittent electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings taken using a wearable device on the wrist.
Photoplethysmogram monitoring using a wearable device on the wrist.
A questionnaire to collect feedback on participants' experiences of wearing the devices.
Time frame: 7 days
Sensitivity and specificity
Time frame: 7 days
Duration of time, expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Percentage
Time frame: Day 8
Feedback obtained from questionnaires (including some responses provided on a Likert Scale with options 'Strongly agree', 'Agree', 'Neither agree nor disagree', 'Disagree', and 'Strongly disagree').
Time frame: Day 1, end of participation
The number for both outward and return legs
Time frame: 7 days
The time from the wearable being first applied to the time of either it being finally removed, or its battery running out (whichever occurs first). Expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Duration of time, and proportion of recording time, expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles). 'Wearable signal' is defined as a non-flat-line signal.
Time frame: 7 days
Percentage, expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Percentages, expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Limits of Agreement technique (consisting of the bias and limits of agreement)
Time frame: 7 days
Limits of Agreement technique (consisting of the bias and limits of agreement)
Time frame: 7 days
sensitivity and specificity
Time frame: 7 days
Sensitivity and specificity
Time frame: 7 days
Percentage, expressed as median (lower, upper quartiles)
Time frame: 7 days
Limits of Agreement technique (consisting of the bias and limits of agreement)
University of Cambridge
Other
SAFER Wearables Study: A Study of the Acceptability and Performance of Wearables for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Older Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05295056
Afib, Arrhythmia Atrial
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06106594
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Arrhythmia
Chermside, Queensl, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04464499
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Bagnolet, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06083012
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Arrhythmia
Marseille, France
View Trial Details