A Study of Salvage Radiotherapy With or Without Enzalutamide in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Surgery

Progression-free survival (PFS) is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS time is measured from randomization to the date of first PFS failure (biochemical or clinical failure, initiation of new unplanned anticancer treatment, or death from any cause) or last known follow-up (censored). Analysis was to occur after progression or death was reported for 101 participants. Biochemical failure is defined as first post-RT detectable PSA (PSA ≥ 0.05). Clinical failure is defined as either a local, regional, or distant failure.

Biochemical failure is defined as the first detectable post-RT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value (≥ 0.05) or the initiation of salvage hormone therapy. Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis.

Alternative biochemical failure is defined as first post-RT PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL or initiation of salvage hormone therapy. Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis.

Hormone-refractory disease is defined as three rises in PSA during salvage androgen deprivation, with the date determined as the midway date between the last non-rising PSA and the first of the three rises. Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with < 10 events overall, such as this one, only the counts of participants with the event are provided.

Distant failure is defined as first radiographic evidence of distant metastasis (e.g., bone scan, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with < 10 events overall, such as this one, only the counts of participants with the event are provided.

Cause-specific mortality is defined as death due to prostate cancer. Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method, treating death as a competing risk, and otherwise censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with < 10 events overall, such as this one, only the counts of participants with the event are provided.

Survival rates were to be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring participants alive at time of analysis, but for endpoints with < 10 events overall, such as this one, only counts are provided. In this case, the number of participants without event (death), which is the number of participants alive.

The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessment questionnaire. The index score is computed from 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). Change score was calculated by subtracting baseline from later score, with a positive change score indicating improvement.

The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessment questionnaire. The index score is computed from 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). Change score was calculated by subtracting baseline from later score, with a positive change score indicating improvement.

The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessment questionnaire. The index score is computed from 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). Change score was calculated by subtracting baseline from later score, with a positive change score indicating improvement.

The PROMIS fatigue score measures self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. Possible raw scores range from 29.4 to 83.2 (higher raw score indicating greater fatigue) and are converted into standardized T-scores (mean=50, standard deviation=10) with higher scores also indicating greater fatigue. Change score is calculated by subtracting baseline T-score from later T-score, with a positive change score indicating increased fatigue.

The PROMIS fatigue score measures self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. Possible raw scores range from 29.4 to 83.2 (higher raw score indicating greater fatigue) and are converted into standardized T-scores (mean=50, standard deviation=10) with higher scores also indicating greater fatigue. Change score is calculated by subtracting baseline T-score from later T-score, with a positive change score indicating increased fatigue.

The PROMIS fatigue score measures self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. Possible raw scores range from 29.4 to 83.2 (higher raw score indicating greater fatigue) and are converted into standardized T-scores (mean=50, standard deviation=10) with higher scores also indicating greater fatigue. Change score is calculated by subtracting baseline T-score from later T-score, with a positive change score indicating increased fatigue.

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5) grades adverse event severity as follows: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, 5 = death related to adverse event. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5) grades adverse event severity as follows: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, 5 = death related to adverse event. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5) grades adverse event severity as follows: 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = life-threatening, 5 = death related to adverse event. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data.

PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials, asking the patient about experience over the last seven days. Scores may reflect worst severity of the symptom (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, and 4=Very severe), frequency of the symptom (0=Never, 1=Rarely, 2=Occasionally, 3=Frequently, 4=Almost constantly), or the symptom's interference with one's "usual or daily activities" (0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much). The symptom row title will indicate "Severity", "Frequency", or "Interference". All scores are compared between arms; statistical analysis results are entered for p-values < 0.05.