Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT03976362
The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, vs. pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo for the treatment of squamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are:
1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent clinical review (BICR). 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to overall survival (OS).
As of Amendment 07, there will be no further analyses for OS and patient-reported outcome assessments.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hospital Italiano Regional del Sur ( Site 0509), Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This study has 2 phases: an Induction Phase (4 Cycles) and a Maintenance Phase (Up to 31 cycles of pembrolizumab). In the Induction Phase, participants receive pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus a taxane (paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel). In the Maintenance Phase, participants with a partial or complete disease response or with stable disease after completing four cycles of induction therapy and who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib OR pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo. In the Maintenance Phase, participants randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab for up to 31 cycles plus maintenance olaparib OR maintenance olaparib placebo until centrally verified progressive disease (PD), intolerable toxicities, or physician decision.
As of Amendment 07, participants actively taking placebo will discontinue taking the placebo intervention and continue in the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: Adequacy of biopsy specimen for the above analyses must be confirmed by the central laboratory before the participant can receive study intervention(s). Submission of another tumor specimen may be required prior to enrolling the participant, if adequate tumor tissue was not provided the first time.
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion
Other names: MK-3475
IV infusion
Other names: PARAPLATIN®
IV infusion
Other names: TAXOL®, ONXAL™
IV infusion
Other names: ABRAXANE®
Tablets
Other names: LYNPARZA®
Placebo to olaparib, tablets
Time frame: Up to approximately 39 months
Progression-free Survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until either documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per RECIST 1.1 is presented. PFS is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 46 months
Overall survival was the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. OS is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it was considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurred during the course of the study. The number of participants who reported 1 or more AEs is presented. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 years
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it was considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurred during the course of the study. The number of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE is presented. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status GHS question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the QoL question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were each scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent), then summed. Summed raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better overall outcome. Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined score was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with the patient-reported outcome (PRO) score as the response variable, and treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and clinical study stratification factors as covariates. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
TTD is defined as the time from Baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) and QoL score (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10- point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. TTD is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Participant responses to the question "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 cough (Item 1) score is presented. Change from baseline score was assessed using a cLDA model with the PRO score as the response variable, and treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and clinical study stratification factors as covariates. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Participant responses to the question "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline (at randomization) to the first onset of a ≥10-point decrease with confirmation by the subsequent visit of a ≥10-point decrease in cough scale score. The TTD for cough (Item 1) is presented. TTD is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Participant responses to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 chest pain (Item 10) score is presented. Change from baseline score was assessed using a cLDA model with the PRO score as the response variable, and treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and clinical study stratification factors as covariates. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific supplemental questionnaire used in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Participant responses to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline (at randomization) to the first onset of a ≥10-point decrease with confirmation by the subsequent visit of a ≥10-point decrease in chest pain scale score. The TTD for chest pain (Item 10) is presented. TTD is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 dyspnea (Item 8) score will be presented. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 dyspnea (Item 8) score is presented. Change from baseline score was assessed using a cLDA model with the PRO score as the response variable, and treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and clinical study stratification factors as covariates. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline (at randomization) to the first onset of a ≥10-point decrease with confirmation by the subsequent visit of a ≥10-point decrease in Item 8 scale score. The TTD for dyspnea (Item 8) is presented. TTD is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better quality of life. The change from baseline in Physical Functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) score is presented. Change from baseline score was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with the patient-reported outcome (PRO) score as the response variable, and treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and clinical study stratification factors as covariates. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better quality of life. TTD was defined as the time from baseline (at randomization) to the first onset of a ≥10-point decrease with confirmation by the subsequent visit of a ≥10-point decrease in physical functioning Items 1 to 5 scale scores. The TTD for physical functioning (Item 1-5) is presented. TTD is reported based on the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Per protocol this outcome measure was not planned for the Induction Phase.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin/Taxane (Paclitaxel or Nab-paclitaxel) Followed by Pembrolizumab With or Without Maintenance Olaparib in the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07723365
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Oujda, Morocco
View Trial DetailsNCT06307093
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Istra, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT03519971
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma
Barretos, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03976323
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details