Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
NCT Number: NCT03976323
The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, versus (vs) pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed for the treatment of non-squamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are: 1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent clinical review (BICR) and 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to overall survival (OS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hospital Italiano Regional del Sur ( Site 0509), Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This study has 2 phases: an Induction Phase of up to ~4 Cycles (up to ~12 weeks [cycle =3 weeks]) and a Maintenance Phase of up to ~31 cycles of pembrolizumab (cycle = 3 weeks]); total pembrolizumab treatment duration will be up to ~35 cycles (up to ~2 years). In the Induction Phase, participants receive pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed plus platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin, at the investigator's discretion). In the Maintenance Phase, participants with a partial or complete disease response or with stable disease after completing four cycles of induction therapy and who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib OR pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed. In the Maintenance Phase, participants receive pembrolizumab for up to 31 cycles (cycle = 3 weeks) plus maintenance olaparib OR maintenance pemetrexed until progressive disease (PD), intolerable toxicities, or physician decision.
Qualified participants in each study arm of the maintenance phase (Pembrolizumab plus Olaparib and Pembrolizumab plus Pemetrexed) who complete up to ~35 cycles of pembrolizumab (up to ~2 years [cycle =3 weeks]) may be eligible to receive a second course of pembrolizumab for up to ~17 cycles (up to ~1 additional year). Per protocol, response or progression during the second pembrolizumab course will not be counted towards patient reported outcomes (PROs) or efficacy outcome measures and adverse events during the second pembrolizumab course will not be counted towards safety outcome measures.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: Adequacy of biopsy specimen for the above analyses must be confirmed by the central laboratory before the participant can start the induction phase. Submission of another tumor specimen may be required prior to enrolling the participant, if adequate tumor tissue was not provided the first time.
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
IV infusion
Other names: ALIMTA®
IV infusion
Other names: PARAPLATIN®
IV infusion
Other names: PLATINOL®, PLATINOL®-AQ
Oral Tablet
Other names: LYNPARZA®
Time frame: Up to ~31 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) based on blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. PFS was analyzed by the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The protocol specified final analysis of PFS is presented here for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~51 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS was analyzed by the non-parametric K-M method. Participants without documented death at the time of analyses were censored at the date of last known to be alive. The protocol specified final analysis of OS is presented here for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~5 years
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experience one or more AEs will be reported. The protocol specified final analysis will be presented for the first pembrolizumab course.
Time frame: Up to ~5 years
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported. The protocol specified final analysis will be presented for the first pembrolizumab course.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions regarding Global Health Status (GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) is computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in GHS and QoL combined score is presented. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to questions on GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall QoL during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) is computed by averaging raw scores of the 2 items and applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS-QoL combined score. TTD estimated by non-parametric K-M method is presented here. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome was not done in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question regarding cough (Item 1): "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 cough (Item 1) score is presented. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question regarding cough (Item 1): "How much did you cough?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in cough (Item 1). TTD estimated by non-parametric K-M method is presented here. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question regarding chest pain (Item 10): "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 chest pain (Item 10) score is presented. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific questionnaire. Participant responses to the question regarding chest pain (Item 10): "Have you had pain in your chest?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in chest pain (Item 10). TTD estimated by non-parametric K-M method is presented here. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question regarding dyspnea (Item 8): "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 dyspnea (Item 8) score is presented. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question regarding dyspnea (Item 8): "Were you short of breath?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A lower score indicates a better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in dyspnea (Item 8). TTD estimated by non-parametric K-M method is presented here. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 is computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (Items 1-5) combined score is presented. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Time frame: Up to ~24 months
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 is computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning (Items 1 to 5). TTD estimated by non-parametric K-M method is presented here. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome. The protocol specified final analysis for the first pembrolizumab course in the Maintenance Phase is reported. Per protocol, analysis for this outcome measure was not planned or conducted in the Induction Phase.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Pemetrexed/Platinum (Carboplatin or Cisplatin) Followed by Pembrolizumab and Maintenance Olaparib vs Maintenance Pemetrexed in the First-Line Treatment of Participants With Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04332653
Adnexal Diseases, Any Advanced Solid Tumors
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03993353
Cancer, Cancer of Esophagus
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01295827
Cancer, Solid Tumor, Carcinoma
View Trial DetailsNCT07723365
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Oujda, Morocco
View Trial Details