Doheny Eye Center
Pasadena, California, 91105, United States
NCT Number: NCT02693119
This is a Phase 2, prospective, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, single-center study in approximately 12 subjects with LHON to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of elamipretide (MTP-131) topical ophthalmic solution in this patient population. At the conclusion of 52 weeks of treatment, subjects will be offered the opportunity to enter an Open Label Extension for up to 48 additional weeks of treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Pasadena, California, 91105, United States
This was a prospective, randomized, double-masked (DM), vehicle-controlled, single-center study plus open label extension period (OLE) in which approximately 12 subjects with LHON having the genetic mtDNA mutation m.11778G>A were randomized in a masked manner into 1 of 3 groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: one drop of elamipretide 1.0% topical ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in the: left eye, right eye, or both eyes.
After completion of the 52-week treatment period or the Week 56 follow-up period, subjects were invited to participate in the OLE period for up to 108 weeks. During the OLE participants received 1% topical opthalmic elamipretide in both eyes (OU) daily. If a subject did not consent to the OLE, he/she completed the study at the Week 56 (±7 days) visit. There were 4 periods in this study: (1) screening period (up to 6 weeks); (2) double-masked treatment period (52 weeks); (3) OLE period (up to 108 weeks), and (4) follow-up period (4 weeks) after completion of End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Other names: MTP-131, Bendavia
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
The incidence of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Time frame: Assessed at Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
Open Label Extension: The incidence of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
The severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Time frame: Assessed at Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
The severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
Double Masked Period: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160 (follow-up visit).
Open Label Extension Period: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) a-wave amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in a-wave amplitude: a more positive number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more negative number mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) a-wave Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in a-wave amplitude: a more positive number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more negative number mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) b-wave amplitude by visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the b-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in b-wave amplitude: a more negative number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more positive number mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Change from baseline in photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) b-wave Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the b-wave is associated with worse outcomes. Change from baseline in b-wave amplitude: a more negative number equals a decrease in amplitude, and therefore a worse outcome, a more positive number means a better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Double Masked Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome. Change from baseline: A more negative number means a better outcome, a more positive number means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Amplitude by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR -ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome. Change from baseline: A more negative number means a better outcome, a more positive number means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Double Masked Period: Change from baseline in PhNR/b-wave amplitude ratio by Visit. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in PhNR amplitude means worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline by visit PhNR/b Wave Amplitude Ratio by visit. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Double Masked Period: Change from baseline by visit in PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for a-wave Amplitude by Visit. Calculated as (b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude)/a-wave amplitude. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline by visit in PhNR Peak to Trough Adjusted for a-wave Amplitude by Visit. [Calculated by b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude)/a-wave amplitude.] Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes. A reduced amplitude ratio equals worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Double Masked Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Peak to Trough Amplitude (Unadjusted) by Visit. Calculated as b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in amplitude is associated with worse outcomes.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline in PhNR Peak to Trough Amplitude (Unadjusted) by Visit. b-wave amplitude - PhNR amplitude. Photopic negative response electroretinography (PhNR-ERG) assesses retinal cell function. A decrease in the amplitude of the a-wave is associated with worse outcomes.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Double Masked: Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Composite score by visit. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Composite score.National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) General Health score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in VFQ-39 General Vision Score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculate
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in VFQ-39 General Vision score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculate
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in VFQ-39 Ocular Pain score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in VFQ-39 Ocular Pain score by visit. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from Baseline in VFQ-39 Near Activities Score from Baseline. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 measures health-related quality of life in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and composite score. For each domain: the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from Baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Near Activities score.. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; score ranges from 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline and Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit)
Change from baseline in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). RNFL measures the loss of retinal ganglion cell axons. RNFL thickness decreases as disease progresses. A positive number, or, absence of change from baseline reflects a good clinical outcome, a negative number reflects loss of thickness, or a bad outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 148
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness by SD-OCT by visit. Change from baseline in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). RNFL measures the loss of retinal ganglion cell axons. RNFL thickness decreases as disease progresses. A positive number, or, absence of change from baseline reflects a good clinical outcome, a negative number reflects loss of thickness, or a bad outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit), except for Day 5 visit.
Change from Baseline in visual field Mean Deviation(MD) as measured by Humphrey automated visual field testing stimulus III by visit. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. Mean deviation (MD) is the mean deviation in the patient's results compared to those expected from the age-matched normative database. Lower/More negative scores mean worse outcome, higher/more positive score means better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Change from Baseline in visual field Mean Deviation(MD) as measured by Humphrey automated visual field testing stimulus III by visit. The Humphrey visual field test measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. Mean deviation (MD) is the mean deviation in the patient's results compared to those expected from the age-matched normative database. Lower/More negative scores mean worse outcome, higher/more positive score means better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Double Masked Period: Change from Baseline in Color Discrimination - Number of Plates from Baseline by Visit by Ishihara Test. Score range: 0-38. Higher number equals better color discrimination equals better outcome. Lower number equals worse color discrimination equals worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Open Label Extension Period: Change from Baseline in Color Discrimination - Number of Plates from Baseline by Visit by Ishihara Test. Score range: 0-38. Higher number equals better color discrimination equals better outcome. Lower number equals worse color discrimination equals worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline to Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Letters are arranged on a 60 x 85 cm chart in sets of triplets which contain the same contrast, decreasing in log10 contrast from top to bottom and left to right as participant progresses from one triplet to the other. Each group of three letters is decreased in contrast by a factor 0.71 (1/√2) (log contrast 0.15) of the proceeding set. Participant reads letters, starting with highest contrast, until unable to read letters in a single group. Score is based on the contrast of the last group read correctly.The size of the letters on the chart subtend 0.5 degrees at 3m, The test is scored in LogCS units, where each set of triplets advances in steps of 0.15 log units ranging from LogCS of 0.00 (approx. 100% contrast) to LogCS 2.25 (approx. 0.56% contrast). Change from baseline: the more negative the number means poor outcome, the more positive the number means better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit from Baseline from Week 68 to Week 160
Letters are arranged on a 60 x 85 cm chart in sets of triplets which contain the same contrast, decreasing in log10 contrast from top to bottom and left to right as participant progresses from one triplet to the other. Each group of three letters is decreased in contrast by a factor 0.71 (1/√2) (log contrast 0.15) of the proceeding set. Participant reads letters, starting with highest contrast, until unable to read letters in a single group. Score is based on the contrast of the last group read correctly. The size of the letters on the chart subtend 0.5 degrees at 3m, The test is scored in LogCS units, where each set of triplets advances in steps of 0.15 log units ranging from LogCS of 0.00 (approx. 100% contrast) to LogCS 2.25 (approx. 0.56% contrast). Change from baseline: the more negative the number means poor outcome, the more positive the number means better outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline and Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit)
Change from baseline in Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness by SD-OCT From Baseline by Visit
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 148,
Open Label Extension Period: Change from baseline in Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness by SD-OCT by SD-OCT by visit
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Distance Activities score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Distance Activities Score.National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Social Functioning Score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Social Functioning score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Mental Health score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Mental Health Score . National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Role Difficulties score National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Role Difficulties Score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39 ) Dependency Score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Dependency score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Color Vision score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Color Vision score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Peripheral Score . National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 160 (End of OLE Period)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) Peripheral Score . National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
Double Masked Period: Change in intraocular Pressure (IOP) in mmHg from Baseline by Visit
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
Change from baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in mmHg by Visit.
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
Open Label Extension: Shift in Slit Lamp Examination from Baseline by Visit: number of eyes that changed from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant for Vehicle Eyes
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
Open Label Extension: Shift in Slit Lamp Examination from Baseline by Visit: number of eyes that changed from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant for Elamipretide Eyes
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
Incidence of Change from normal or Abnormal, clinically insignificant to normal clinically significant
Time frame: Assessed at each visit: Baseline, Day 5 Visit, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 (End of treatment visit) and Week 56 (Follow up visit)
Double Masked: Dilated Fundus Changes from Baseline: Vehicle Eye and Elamipretide Eyes Incidence of Change from normal or Abnormal-clinically insignificant, to normal clinically significant
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 68, 84, 100, 116, 132, 148, 152, Week 160/ (End of treatment visit)
Incidence of Change from normal or Abnormal-clinically insignificant, to normal clinically significant
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Week 52 (end-of-treatment visit) and Week 56 (follow-up visit)
Change from baseline in Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) General Health score. National Eye Institute VFQ-39 score measures health-related quality of life of subjects with visual impairment, in 12 domains: general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, vision-specific social functioning, vision-specific mental health, vision-specific role difficulties, vision-specific dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision and 1 composite score. Each domain is converted to a 0 to 100 scale; the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. Higher score means higher functioning. Scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score. For the composite score, the vision-targeted sub-scale scores are averaged, excluding the general health questions. Domain scores from each cohort are averaged and the change from baseline per domain is calculated.
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02161380
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cranial Nerve Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04909398
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cranial Nerve Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00747487
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cranial Nerve Diseases
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01421381
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cranial Nerve Diseases
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details