Seoul, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT01903720
A Safety and Efficacy Study of OZURDEX® in Macular Edema Associated With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of OZURDEX® (700 µg dexamethasone implant) in patients with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of macular edema
- Best corrected visual acuity of approximately 20/400 to 20/40 in the study eye
Exclusion criteria
- Use of systemic steroids (eg, oral, intravenous, intramuscular, epidural, rectal, or extensive dermal) within 1 month
- Intraocular surgery, including cataract surgery, and/or laser surgery of any type within 3 months
- Any active ocular infection in either eye
Treatment and study plan
Dexamethasone implant
DrugOZURDEX® (700 µg dexamethasone implant) administered intravitreally on day 0, and approximately every 4 months as needed (based on physician judgment) for up to 12 months.
Other names: OZURDEX®
Primary outcomes
-
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 letters (best). A positive number change in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision improved and a negative number change in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision has worsened.
Secondary outcomes
-
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Month 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
CRT was measured in the study eye using optical computed tomography (OCT), a laser based non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
-
Change From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 letters (best). A positive number change in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision improved and a negative number change in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision has worsened.
-
Change From Baseline in CRT at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
CRT was measured in the study eye using optical computed tomography (OCT), a laser based non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
-
Change From Baseline in BCVA at Each Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Months 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 letters (best). A positive number change in the number of letters read means that the vision improved and a negative number change in the number of letters read means that the vision has worsened.
-
Change From Baseline in CRT at Each Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Months 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12
CRT was measured in the study eye using optical computed tomography (OCT), a laser based non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
-
Percentage of Participants With a Change From Baseline of 15 or More Letters in BCVA
Time frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12
BCVA is measured in the study eye using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 letters (best). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision improved and a decrease in the number of letters read correctly means that the vision has worsened.
-
Percentage of Participants Receiving a Second Injection
Time frame: 12 Months
-
Percentage of Participants Receiving a Third Injection
Time frame: 12 Months
-
Time to Second Injection
Time frame: 12 Months
Time in weeks from the first injection to the second injection.
-
Time to Third Injection
Time frame: 12 Months
Time in weeks from the second injection to the third injection.
-
Percentage of Participants Who Received Laser Treatments
Time frame: 12 Months
Participants underwent laser photocoagulation therapy for all areas of foveal leakage and non-perfusion, as well as areas of extensive retinal hyperplasia if applicable for rescue therapy.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Industry
Registry information
Acronym: COBALT
Important dates
- Study start
- 2013
- Primary completion
- 2014
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Jul 19, 2013
- Registry last updated
- Apr 17, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of IVT MHU650 in Macular Edema Patients
NCT04635800
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetic Macular Edema
Huntington Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsFunctional and Anatomical Outcomes of Dexamethasone Intra-vitreal Implant in Patients with Resistant Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion After Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection
NCT05003258
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism and Thrombosis
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsA Study to Evaluate the Usability of the SB11 PFS in Subjects With Wet AMD or Macular Oedema Secondary to RVO
NCT06176963
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism and Thrombosis
Katowice, Poland
View Trial DetailsA Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Patients With Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
NCT04592419
Cardiovascular Diseases, Embolism and Thrombosis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details