Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04592419

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Patients With Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)

This Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy, durability, and safety of KSI-301 compared to aflibercept, in participants with macular edema due to treatment-naïve branch (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This is a Phase 3, prospective, randomized, double-masked, two-arm, multi-center non-inferiority study evaluating the efficacy and safety of repeated intravitreal dosing of KSI-301 5 mg in participants with visual impairment due to treatment-naïve macular edema secondary to RVO (either branch or central type).

The primary endpoint will be assessed at Week 24; additional secondary endpoints for efficacy will be assessed at Week 24 and Week 48.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent prior to participation in the study.
  • Treatment-naïve macular edema of 6 months duration or less due to CRVO or BRVO. Participants with hemiretinal vein occlusion will be included as CRVO.
  • BCVA ETDRS letter score between 80 and 25 (20/25 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent), inclusive in the Study Eye.
  • CST of ≥ 320 microns on SD-OCT (Heidelberg Spectralis or equivalent on other OCT instruments) as determined by the Reading Center
  • Decrease in vision determined by the Investigator to be primarily the result of ME secondary to RVO.
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

  • Macular edema in the Study Eye for reasons other than RVO
  • Active iris or angle neovascularization, neovascular glaucoma, neovascularization of the optic disc, retinal neovascularization or vitreous hemorrhage in the Study Eye.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the Study Eye.
  • Active retinal disease other than the condition under investigation in the Study Eye.
  • Any history or evidence of a concurrent ocular condition present, that in the opinion of the Investigator could require either medical or surgical intervention alter visual acuity during the study
  • Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection or inflammation
  • Any prior use of an approved or investigational treatment for macular edema secondary to RVO in the Study Eye (e.g. anti-VEGF, intraocular or periocular steroids, macular laser photocoagulation).
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant during the study.
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic value ≥100 mmHg while at rest
  • Recent history (within the 6 months prior to screening) of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute congestive heart failure or any acute coronary event.
  • History of a medical condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude scheduled study visits, completion of the study, or a safe administration of investigational product.
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

KSI-301

Drug

Intravitreal Injection

aflibercept

Drug

Intravitreal Injection

Other names: Eylea

Sham Procedure

Other

The sham is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal injection. It involves pressing the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) against the anesthetized eye. It will be administered to participants in both treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to Week 24 in BRVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 24

    BCVA as a continuous variable measured at each study visit using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA approach.

  2. Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Day 1 to Week 24 in All RVO Patients.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 24

    BCVA as a continuous variable measured at each study visit using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA approach.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA (ETDRS Letters) by Visit Over Time up to Week 48 for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48

    BCVA as a continuous variable measured at each study visit using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA approach.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Gain ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 Letters From Baseline Over Time up to Week 48 for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48

    Number of participants in each treatment arm who meet specified criteria at each visit from Week 1 through Week 48. Percentages are 100*n/N.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Lose ≥ 5, ≥10 and ≥15 ETDRS Letters From Baseline Over Time up to Week 48 for All RVO Participants

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48

    Number of participants in each treatment arm who meet specified criteria at each visit from Week 1 through Week 48. Percentages are 100*n/N.

  4. Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better Over Time (≥69 ETDRS Letters) for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48.

    Percentage of participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better from Baseline to Week 48. Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 is 69 ETDRS letters. Number of participants in each treatment arm who meet specified criteria at each visit from Baseline through Week 48. Percentages are 100*n/N.

  5. Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (≤ 38 ETDRS Letters) Over Time for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Baseline - Week 48

    Percentage of Participants with BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse from Baseline to Week 48. Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 is 38 ETDRS letters. Number of participants in each treatment arm who meet specified criteria at each visit from Baseline through Week 48. Percentages are 100*n/N.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Absence of Macular Edema (Defined as OCT CST < 325 Microns) Over Time for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Baseline - Week 48

    Macular Edema (ME) is assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield thickness (CST). A thickness of less than 325 microns is considered absence of ME. Proportion of participants with Absence of Macular Edema from Baseline to Week 48. Number of participants in each treatment arm who meet specified criteria at each visit from Week 1 through Week 48. Percentages are 100*n/N.

  7. Mean Change in OCT Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CST) From Baseline by Visit Over Time for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48

    Mean change in OCT central subfield retinal thickness (CST) from baseline by visit over time (up to Week 48) for all RVO participants.

  8. Mean Change in OCT Center Point Retinal Thickness (CPT) From Baseline by Visit Over Time for All RVO Participants.

    Time frame: Day 1 - Week 48

    Mean change in OCT center point retinal thickness (CPT) from baseline by visit over time (up to Week 48) for all RVO participants.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kodiak Sciences Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked, Active Comparator-controlled, Multi-center, Two-arm, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-301 Compared With Intravitreal Aflibercept in Participants With Visual Impairment Due to Treatment-naïve Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)

Acronym: BEACON

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 19, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.