No intervention
OtherDuring the no treatment period participants do not receive any study drug
NCT Number: NCT07157254
The main goal of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GTX-102 in participants with Angelman syndrome.
Interested in participating?
Request Info1 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
This basket study is designed to evaluate safety and efficacy of GTX-102 in participants with Angelman syndrome across genotypes and age groups. The study consists of subprotocols A, B, C and D. All subprotocols are open-label and follow the same design which includes a Screening, Loading and Maintenance period. Subprotocols A, B and C are single arm only. In subprotocol D, participants are randomized 2:1 to a GTX-102 group or a No Treatment group. The No Treatment group follows the same schedule of events as all other groups after completion of the No Treatment period. Participants from all the subprotocols have the option to continue treatment in a long-term extension study following their end of study visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During the no treatment period participants do not receive any study drug
antisense oligonucleotide
Other names: apazunersen
Time frame: Up to Day 506
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
The following assessments will be included to calculate the MDRI net response: Bayley-4 Cognitive and Receptive Communication, Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Community (ABC-C) Hyperactivity/Noncompliance (H/N), Angelman Severity Assessment (ASA) Sleep, ASA Gross Motor. For each assessment a meaningful score difference (MSD) is defined. A single net response score per participant will be derived accordingly, and a summary measure of net response will then be calculated across all participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
The following assessments will be included to calculate the MDRI net response: Vineland-3 Expressive and Receptive Communication, ABC-C Irritability, ASA Gross Motor. For each assessment a meaningful score difference (MSD) is defined. A single net response score per participant will be derived accordingly, and a summary measure of net response will then be calculated across all participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Time frame: Baseline, Day 338
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
HCPs Contact: Medical Information
CONTACT
Patients Contact Trial Recruitment
CONTACT
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
Industry
A Phase 2, Open-label, Basket Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of GTX-102 in Adult and Pediatric Subjects With Deletion- or Nondeletion-type Angelman Syndrome
Acronym: Aurora
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07605429
Abnormalities, Multiple, Angelman Syndrome
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07181837
Abnormalities, Multiple, Angelman Syndrome
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06914609
Abnormalities, Multiple, Angelman Syndrome
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07417137
Abnormalities, Multiple, Angelman Syndrome
Lexington, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details