Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Matthew Triplette, MD, MPH
CONTACT
Matthew Triplette, MD, MPH
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07490860
This clinical trial develops and studies whether a restorative justice-based lung cancer screening (LCS) decision-making support intervention tailored for Black individuals increases LCS among Black community members. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths among Black men and women. LCS with yearly low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) is recommended for people with current or recent tobacco use (within 15 years) who are aged 50-80 with at least a 20 pack-year smoking history. LCS lowers lung cancer death by 20%; however, data shows that LCS completion remains low among minority groups in the United States. The restorative justice-based LCS decision-making support intervention in this trial has been specifically tailored to meet the needs of Black individuals. It is designed to reduce racial unfairness by promoting trust, shared understanding, and empowerment in clinical decision making while addressing the social and historical circumstances of health inequalities. This may be an effective way to increase LCS among Black community members.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–77 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Matthew Triplette, MD, MPH
CONTACT
Matthew Triplette, MD, MPH
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OUTLINE:
Participants attend an in-person restorative justice-based LCS decision-making support session over 2-3 hours on study.
After completion of study intervention, participants may be followed up at 90 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Attend LCS decision-making support session
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Time frame: At post-intervention (Day 1)
Assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). The AIM will be summarized and presented as a range of scores from 1 (low acceptability/appropriateness) to 5 (high acceptability/appropriateness).
Time frame: At pre- and post-intervention (both on Day 1)
Will be assessed using the Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge 7 question score. Pre- and post-intervention responses will be compared via Chochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Friedman tests.
Time frame: At pre- and post-intervention (both on Day 1)
Will be assessed using the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales. Participant responses will be summarized with the median and range of scores at pre- and post-intervention.
Time frame: At pre- and post-intervention (both on Day 1)
Will be assessed using the Discrimination in Medical Setting and Group-Based Medical Mistrust scale. Participant responses will be summarized with the median and range of scores at pre- and post-intervention.
Time frame: At pre- and post-intervention (both on Day 1)
Will be assessed using the Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale: smoking-related subscale. Participant responses will be summarized with the median and range of scores at pre- and post-intervention.
Time frame: At post-intervention (Day 1)
Will be assessed using the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. Participant responses will be summarized with the median and range of scores, with 0 indicating no SDM behavior and 100 indicating ideal SDM behavior.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-intervention
Will assess completion of chest CT within 90 days post-intervention with no comparison.
Time frame: At 90 days post-intervention
Will recruit a subset of participants to participate in a semi-structured interview post-intervention to gain an in-depth understanding of intervention acceptability and intervention refinement, including participant perspectives about the integration of restorative justice-based lung cancer screening decision-making support. Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using a mixed inductive-deductive approach to thematic analysis.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Other
Integrating Restorative Practices to Enhance Shared Decision-Making and Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening in Black Community Members (RESTORE)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07285044
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07176000
Lung Carcinoma, Lung Diseases
Auburn, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06995898
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Pleasanton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05407168
Lung Carcinoma, Lung Diseases
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details