Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01557140

A Randomized Trial of Carvedilol in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy causes substantial morbidity and mortality in Latin America. Whether RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers are safe and beneficial has been challenged because of the lack of formal trials. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. This way, the investigators conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized trial in 42 patients with Trypanosoma cruzi infection and cardiomyopathy. All patients received enalapril (up-titrated to 20 mg BID) and spironolactone (25 mg QD). Subsequently, the patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 20) or carvedilol up-titrated to 25 mg BID (n = 19). The primary end points were change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after RAS inhibition and that after the addition of carvedilol. The secondary end points were changes in other echocardiographic parameters, Framingham score, quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey), New York Heart Association class, radiographic indices, brain natriuretic peptide levels, and chemokines as well as safety end points.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Chagas Disease Outpatient Center of the Federal University of Minas Gerais

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

About this study

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) is an important cause of heart failure (HF) and sudden death in Latin America.1 According to recent estimates, 13 million people worldwide are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, of whom 3.0 to 3.3 million are symptomatic.2 The incidence rate is 200000 cases per year. Among those infected, 30% have clinical features of CCC and 15% ultimately develop overt left ventricular (LV) insufficiency-the main prognostic determinant of the disease. In Chagas cardiomyopathy, the hemodynamic and neurohormonal responses do not differ from those in other cardiomyopathies. This common pathophysiology suggests that treatments shown to be effective by classic HF trials should be beneficial in CCC. However, CCC has several specific characteristics, such as early cardiac denervation, frequent ventricular arrhythmias, and several forms as well as grades of conduction disturbances, including sinus bradycardia, complete atrioventricular block, and right bundle-branch block. Morphologically, hypertrophy, dilatation, and severe fibrosis are prominent. In 20% to 40% of cases, an apical ventricular aneurysm is present.1 These peculiarities in combination lead to a high incidence of sudden death (60% of all deaths), cardiac insufficiency, and ventricular remodeling. The responses of patients to the usual drugs prescribed in HF could be different, and this perception has led to the suboptimal dosing or lack of initiation of medical treatments that are of proven efficacy in patients with other etiologies of HF. The underlying problem is that therapies that are effective in patients with HF caused by non-chagasic cardiomyopathies, such as those with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) and h-blockers, have yet to be formally tested in CCC. There are few clinical trials and no randomized study on this subject. Consequently, the investigators evaluated the effects of optimizing treatment with enalapril and spironolactone and then undertook a randomized trial of adding a h-blocker in the treatment of patients with CCC.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Criteria for inclusion were positivity for T cruzi as confirmed by 2 or more serological tests (indirect immunofluorescence, ELISA, and/or indirect hemagglutination) and having cardiomyopathy.
  • Cardiomyopathy was present when at least 3 of the following criteria were fulfilled:
  • LV enddiastolic diameter (LVDD) N55 mm
  • LVDD/body surface area > 2.7cm/m2
  • LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 55%
  • QRS interval > 120 ms
  • echocardiographic evidence of diffuse or segmental systolic wall motion abnormalities.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria were being pregnant
  • Using any h-blocker
  • Having additional comorbidities (eg, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and renal or hepatic failure).

Treatment and study plan

RASi plus carvedilol

Drug

Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups, with 1 group receiving renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (enalapril) plus carvedilol and the other receiving renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (enalapril) plus placebo

Other names: Randomized, Double blind, Controlled, Trial

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Framingham score

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  2. Changes in quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  3. Changes in New York Heart Association functional class

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  4. Changes in cardiothoracic ratio

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  5. Changes in echocardiographic diastolic function indices

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  6. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide levels

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  7. Changes in chemokines

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

  8. Changes in autoantibodies levels

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 8 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Minas Gerais

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Trial of Carvedilol After Renin-angiotensin System Inhibition in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2004
Study completion
2006
First posted
Mar 19, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.