Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01760083

A Randomized Multicentre Trial to Evaluate the Utilization of Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions

CTOs are common among patients with angina, and are detected in around 20% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Treatment of CTO has been found to constitute only 7% of PCI practice on average. One of the reasons for the under-presentation of CTOs in PCI target lesions is the lack of evidence-based medical data on treatment indications, and the continued low level of accepted evidence for the treatment of CTOs by PCI in PCI guidelines.

Patients with a CTO represent patients with stable coronary artery disease. The COURAGE trial comparing PCI with optimal medical therapy in stable coronary disease did not show a difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the two treatment options. However, CTOs were not included in the COURAGE trial. But that trial did confirm the superiority of PCI over OMT in controlling symptoms of angina, with a high cross-over rate to PCI. Whether PCI for CTO is superior to OMT in reducing MACE in those patients with a large ischaemic burden has never been tested in a randomized controlled trial.

While there is compelling evidence from registry studies of a clinical and prognostic benefit following successful PCI of CTO compared with PCI failure, there has been no randomized controlled trial of contemporary PCI using drug-eluting stents versus optimal medical therapy. The COURAGE trial nuclear sub-study confirms both that prognosis is closely related to the extent of residual ischaemia and that PCI is more effective in reducing residual ischaemia than optimal medical therapy alone. This confirms earlier retrospective data suggesting that the benefit of PCI is greatest in patients with moderate (10-20%) or severe (>20%) ischaemia.

Study hypothesis: PCI with Biolimus eluting stent implantation plus OMT will be superior to OMT alone in improving health status at 12-month follow-up, and will be noninferior with respect to the composite of all cause death/ non fatal MI at 36-month follow up, in patients with a CTO in an epicardial coronary artery >2.5 mm diameter and chronic stable angina with evidence of ischemia and viability in the territory subtended by the CTO

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age with written informed consent
  • CTO in native coronary artery
  • a) Stable angina, or b) myocardial ischaemia in a territory supplied by CTO, and c) viability in akinetic myocardium (<50% transmural late enhancement on MRI or normal resting perfusion scan)
  • CTO located in segments 1-3 (RCA), 6-7 (LAD), 11-12 (LCx)
  • target artery ≥2.5mm

Exclusion criteria

  • AMI or NSTE-ACS within 1 month
  • Significant untreated coronary stenosis in a territory other than CTO
  • Patients with MVD and significant non-CTO stenoses where it is deemed unsafe to treat the non-CTO lesion first (e.g. Significant proximal LAD lesion with chronically occluded RCA)
  • Patient unsuitable for 12 month dual anti-platelet therapy
  • Any exclusion criteria for PCI or DES
  • Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure

Treatment and study plan

Biolimus-eluting stent implantation

Device

Recanalization of chronic coronary artery occlusion and subsequent implantation of one or ore Biosensor stents

Other names: Biosensors Biolimus-eluting stents of all sizes and lengths

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D for health outcomes measurement

  2. Major cardiovascular events

    Time frame: 36 months

    Cumulative composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI at 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety and efficacy endpoints

    Time frame: 12 and 36 months

    All cause mortality Cardiac mortality Myocardial Infarction Any hospitalization due to cardiovascular events (angina, congestive heart failure, arrythmias) Repeat revascularization

  2. Procedural complications

    Time frame: baseline upto 36 months

    Incl. periprocedural enzyme leak (defined by CK increase >3 times ULN); pericprocedural MI (new Q-wave or STEMI); pericardial tamponade, need for urgent CABG, CIN, death within 30 days, proven periprocedural cerebrovascular events

  3. Protocol adherence

    Time frame: 36 months

    Need to cross from OMT to PCI in Group 2 (after escalation up to maximum tolerated anti-anginal therapy and persistent unequivocal symptoms)

  4. Per protocol analysis

    Time frame: 36 months

    primary endpoint comparison in patients who did have a successful revascularization compared to those patients treated medically who had no subsequent PCI

Other outcomes

  1. Health-economic analysis

    Time frame: 12 and 36 months

    Economic assessment & cost efficacy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Euro CTO Club

Other

Collaborators

  • Asahi Intecc Co., Ltd.
  • Biosensors International
  • NHS Research and Development

Registry information

Acronym: EuroCTO

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 3, 2013
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.