Monroe Biomedical Research
Monroe, North Carolina, 28112, United States
NCT Number: NCT06571370
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate substantial equivalence between Pression's Wave PRO System and a commercially available predicate ECP device to support a U.S. 510(k) submission for the Wave PRO System.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Monroe, North Carolina, 28112, United States
Participants will receive compressions from both ECP systems in a crossover design. Diastolic augmentation ratio and levels of systolic unloading will be evaluated for each participant on each test ECP system.
Participants will be aged 35+, with a history of coronary artery disease, serve as their own control, and meet the Inclusion Criteria and none of the Exclusion Criteria.
Test order of the ECP systems will be randomized for each participant.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cardiac gated, lower limb compression
Time frame: During treatment, measured at the 8th minute of compressions
The primary effectiveness endpoint was the average Diastolic Augmentation (DA) ratio for the 8th minute of compressions with each ECP device tested for each participant, as identified by the blinded Independent Waveform Evaluator. Diastolic Augmentation (DA) ratio, also referred to as Diastolic/Systolic (D/S) ratio and Effectiveness Ratio (ER), noninvasively characterizes the hemodynamic effect and thus the clinical effectiveness of ECP treatment. DA ratio is a unitless measure which is "calculated as the ratio of the peak diastolic amplitude divided by the peak systolic amplitude" [Suresh et al., 1998]. In a typical, non-augmented, cardiac cycle, the diastolic peak is seen as a small increase in the arterial waveform just after the aortic valve closes (dicrotic notch). With augmentation, the peak diastolic amplitude is distinctly elevated and may reach a significant proportion of the peak systolic amplitude or in some cases exceed it.
Time frame: At last compression after 10 minutes of compression
The level of systolic unloading was recorded based on the systolic peaks during compressions compared to baseline PPG data. Systolic unloading is the percent change of peak systolic amplitude calculated as the difference of the compression waveform - non-compressed baseline waveform divided by amplitude at compression waveform. Systolic unloading components were measured using the peak systolic amplitude on the last compression waveform from the ECP session. The baseline non-compressed peak systolic amplitude was measured from the waveform immediately following the compressed waveform. Higher levels of systolic unloading are considered better. The predicate devices are documented to produce mean systolic unloading of approximately 11%.
Time frame: At last compression after 10 minutes of compression
Systolic unloading is the ratio of the systolic peak during compressions divided by baseline systolic peak. Systolic unloading is represented by a percentage decrease of systolic peak value with and without compression. This value should be < 1. The baseline systolic peaks after compressions will be used. Higher levels of systolic unloading are considered better. The predicate devices are documented to produce mean systolic unloading of approximately 11%.
Pression
Industry
Acronym: WaveCRESST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03350737
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Stable
Belgrade, Serbia
View Trial DetailsNCT02591758
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Stable
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01804439
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Acute Myocardial Infarction
View Trial DetailsNCT02710435
Angina Pectoris, Angina Pectoris, Stable
Graz, Austria
View Trial Details