Dublin Dental University Hospital
Dublin, D02 F859, Ireland
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06453330
This research will be a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating whether the use of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin (H-PRF) increases implant stability compared to those implants placed without H-PRF, and therefore, contributes to the implant's overall success.
H-PRF is a second generation platelet concentrate that consists of a fibrin mesh containing cytokines and leukocytes. It has been shown to stimulate mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts that encourage bone formation as a result of the growth factors released from platelets, which should aid in osseointegration of implants. There is limited research that investigates the effects of H-PRF on implant stability. There is, however, some evidence that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which is produced in a fixed-angle centrifuge, increases implant stability and H-PRF is considered the evolution of PRF products.
This research would follow a H-PRF preparation protocol which involves taking a sample of venous blood from patients using a butterfly needle to collect up to 8-9ml tubes of blood. After the tube of blood is collected, it would immediately be placed in a horizontal centrifuge machine with 3 tubes of water to balance the centrifuge, and placed opposite each other. A set rpm and time will be chosen, and the centrifuge will run until the time is complete. The H-PRF clots would then be ready and taken out of the tubes to separate them from the red blood cells.
Following randomisation, implants will be placed in the upper or lower jaws of patients attending the Dublin Dental University Hospital using the standard implant protocol. Half of the implants will be coated with H-PRF, the other half (control group) would be placed without HPRF. Implant stability and marginal bone levels will be measured at three different stages: 1) Initial implant placement, 2) Second stage surgery when the implant is uncovered after healing and integrated with the bone, 3) When the definitive crown or bridge is attached to the implant. Insertion torque at baseline will also be measured. The above results will be collected and assessed to determine the effects of H-PRF, if any, on implant stability and the preservation of bone levels around implants.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dublin, D02 F859, Ireland
Location status: Recruiting
This is a parallel arm, randomised control clinical Trial (RCT) on a cohort of Dublin Dental University Hospital patients who are having dental implants placed in the maxilla or mandible.
Study sample:
Enrolment and Consent:
Participants will be selected via two methods:
If a single patient will be receiving more than one dental implants and there are numerous implant sites that qualify for entry into the research, only one of the implant sites will be randomly selected for the study. If a patient opts not to participate, it will not affect their care.
Randomisation:
At the time of surgery, each patient will select a numbered, sealed envelope with the treatment group allocation. Each envelope will correspond to a number on a computer-generated randomisation list created prior to enrolment of study participants. The operator will then use either the H-PRF or not use H-PRF when placing the implant depending on what was revealed when the envelope was opened. Neither the operator or the patient can be blinded to the arm chosen as blood sample will only be taken for the H-PRF group.
The blood sample collection and surgeries will be performed by Dr Rawan Kahatab.
H-PRF is used regularly in the DDUH and the clinical protocol will not deviate from standard procedures used at the hospital. H-PRF preparation protocol involves taking a sample of venous blood from patients using a butterfly needle to collect up to 8-9ml tubes of blood. After the first tube is collected, it would immediately be placed in a horizontal centrifuge machine, balanced out with 3 tubes of water, to ensure the centrifuge is properly balanced. A set rpm and time will be chosen, and the centrifuge will run until the time is complete. The H-PRF clots would then be ready and taken out of the tubes to separate them from the red blood cells. Peri-apical radiographs of the surgical site are taken pre-operatively, at implant placement and at implant restoration for all implants placed at the Dublin Dental University Hospital.
________________________________________________________________
Similar studies that have previously been carried out to assess the effect of PRF on implant stability have focused on PRF produced from fixed-angle systems as opposed to horizontal ones. However, they have followed a very similar design to our proposed design. For example, in a study by Tabrizi et al., (2017), a split-mouth randomised clinical trial was performed. Twenty patients with missing teeth in the molar region of the maxilla, requiring bilateral implants, were included. PRF was used on one side (group 1); no PRF was used on the other (group 2). Implant stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after placement. At 2 weeks, the mean ISQ was 60.60 ± 3.42 in group 1 and 58.25 ± 3.64 in group 2; at 4 weeks it was 70.30 ± 3.36 in group 1 and 67.15 ± 4.33 in group 2; at 6 weeks it was 78.45 ± 3.36 in group 1 and 76.15 ± 2.94 in group 2. Significant differences in RFA were found between the groups at 2 weeks (P = 0.04), 4 weeks (P = 0.014), and 6 weeks (P = 0.027) after placement.
The study results suggest that the use of PRF may enhance the post-insertion stability of dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla during the healing period. In another study by Oncu et al., (2015), twenty healthy patients with adequate alveolar bone and two or more adjacent missing teeth extracted at least 6 months previously were included. A minimum of two tapered implants were placed in each patient. After surgical preparation of the implant sockets, PRF that had been prepared preoperatively was placed randomly into one of the sockets. Resonance frequency measurements were made after implant placement and at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. Mean implant stability quotients (ISQs) of the PRF implants was 69.3 ± 10.5, and mean ISQs for the PRF- implants was 64.5 ± 12.2 at the end of the first week. The mean ISQs at 4 weeks postoperatively were 77.1 ± 7.1 for the PRF+ group and 70.5 ± 7.7 for the group without PRF. In this study, PRF application increased implant stability during the early healing period, as evidenced by higher ISQ values. Based on the results of these studies and the fact that H-PRF is an even more superior biomaterial than PRF, our study should achieve outcomes that are just as successful.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patient Level
Exclusion criteria
Patient Level
Most commercially available centrifuges used for PRF production are fixed-angle systems designed primarily for pelleting samples to the bottom of tubes and are not particularly efficient at separating the cell layers effectively. Research has demonstrated that PRF produced using horizontal centrifugation (H-PRF) can lead to a higher concentration of platelets and leukocytes compared to PRF produced from fixed-angle centrifugation (LPRF). The resulting PRF from horizontal centrifugation is termed 'horizontal platelet-rich fibrin' (H-PRF). The H-PRF clot will be produced using a Bio-PRF horizontal centrifuge machine. This machine is CE marked and regularly used in the Dublin Dental University Hospital.
Time frame: At implant placement, at 3 months and at 4-5 months (implant restoration)
This is a measurement of the stability of the implant
Time frame: At implant placement, at 3 months and at 4-5 months (implant restoration)
The level of bone around the implant
Time frame: after local anaesthetic wears away, 24 hours after implant placement and 1 week after implant placement
Rate of pain experienced using a survey that will be given to patients. They will be given a visual analog scale and asked to use that to rate their pain.
Time frame: At any point from implant placement until 4-5 months afterwards
Any implant failures/infections. This includes loss of implant, fracture of the implant or infection of the implant site.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Dr Ioannis Polyzois, Consultant
CONTACT
Rawan Kahatab, BDS
CONTACT
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Other
A Randomised Control Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Horizontal-Platelet-Rich Fibrin (H-PRF) vs Standard Placement on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Levels in Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06967649
Dental Implant Stability, Implant Survival Using Immediate Loading Protocol
Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06034067
Dental Implant Failed, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT05766878
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Foggia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06758440
Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant
Minya, Egypt
View Trial Details