Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07286578

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)

The OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial has been designed to compare two imaging strategies and to test the hypothesis that a calcium modification strategy informed by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) will improve procedural efficiency and effectiveness compared with the current standard of care (IVUS-guided PCI) while achieving similar clinical outcomes in patients with hemodynamically significant calcified coronary artery disease.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The OPTIMAL Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study evaluating whether a coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided calcium modification strategy can improve the treatment of patients with hemodynamically significant, calcified coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Seven hundred patients with flow-limiting stenosis (FFRCT ≤0.80) and moderate-to-severe calcification on CCTA will be randomized 1:1 to either CCTA-guided or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided calcium modification. The study includes two co-primary endpoints: (1) superiority in final minimal stent area assessed by IVUS, and (2) non-inferiority in 12-month target vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization).

CCTA-guided strategy uses advanced calcium characterization to inform pre-procedural planning and selection of plaque modification techniques. IVUS-guided strategy follows contemporary intravascular imaging-based criteria for plaque preparation and PCI optimization.

The trial aims to determine whether leveraging non-invasive CT-based calcium assessment can enhance procedural efficiency and stent results while maintaining clinical safety comparable to IVUS-guided PCI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject must be at least 18 years of age and younger than 85 years old
  • Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable angina, silent ischemia (ischemia in the absence of chest pain or other anginal equivalents), unstable angina, or acute myocardial infarction) suitable for PCI. Patients with a clinical indication for revascularization presenting with stable coronary artery disease or stabilized acute coronary syndrome defined as follows unstable angina (Braunwald class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC), patients with NSTEMI without high-risk features such as recurrence of chest pain, ST-segment depression>1mm in ≥6 leads plus STsegment elevation in aVR, life-threatening arrhythmias, mechanical complications of MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, GRACE risk score>140.
  • All target vessels must have reference vessel diameter (visually assessed by CCTA) ≥ 2.5 mm
  • Subject must provide written informed consent before any study-related procedure

Exclusion criteria

  • STEMI as the clinical presentation.
  • Uncontrolled or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
  • Hemodynamic instability.
  • Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  • Left main coronary artery stenosis > 50%
  • Atrial fibrillation, flutter, or arrhythmias during CT acquisition.
  • Previous PCI in the target vessel or CABG.
  • BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • Insufficient CT quality assessed by the Core lab.
  • Comorbidity with life expectancy ≤ 2 years.
  • Planned major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery within 24 months after the index procedure Note: Major surgery is any invasive operative procedure in which an extensive resection is performed, e.g., a body cavity is entered, organs are removed, or normal anatomy is altered. Note: Minor surgery is an operation on the superficial structures of the body or a manipulative procedure that does not involve a serious risk. Planned minor surgery is not excluded.
  • The subject has received a solid organ transplant that is functioning or is active on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants with expected transplantation within 24 months.
  • The subject receives immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy.
  • The subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy) or the chest/mediastinum.
  • Subject has a platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3.
  • The subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder as defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh ≥ Class B.
  • The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. The subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, or any prior intracranial bleed, or any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g., aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc. The subject has a life expectancy <2 years for any non-cardiac cause.
  • Subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device clinical study.
  • Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 2 years following index procedure. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test.
  • Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.
  • Unable to provide written informed consent (IC).

Treatment and study plan

CT(Computed Tomography) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Device

CT will be used to determine lesion characteristics and post-procedural IVUS to confirm correct implantation of stent

IVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Device

IVUS will be used to determine lesion characteristics and post-procedural IVUS to confirm correct implantation of stent

Primary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate that CT-guided calcium modification results in a superior final MSA Minimal Stent Area (MSA) - Imaging Endpoint (Superiority)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Final post-PCI minimal stent area per target lesion, measured by independent core laboratory using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Assesses whether CT-guided calcium modification results in superior stent expansion compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

  2. Target Vessel Failure (TVF) - Clinical Endpoint (Non-Inferiority)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (ID-TVR). TV-MI and ID-TVR are defined according to ARC-2 and the Fourth Universal Definition of MI.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural efficiency: Procedure time

    Time frame: During PCI

    Time from first angiogram to final angiogram

  2. Procedural efficiency:Radiation dose-area product

    Time frame: During PCI

    Dose-area product (DAP) recorded during PCI.

  3. Procedural efficiency: Contrast volume

    Time frame: During PCI

    Total contrast volume (mL) used during PCI.IVUS-Derived Mechanistic Endpoints (Core Lab)

  4. Procedural Efficiency: Stent Area on Immediate Post-Stent IVUS

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    MSA prior to any final IVUS-guided optimization.

  5. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Original Minimal Lumen Area (MLA)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Stent area at the co-registered site of the baseline MLA.

  6. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Site of Maximum Calcium Arc

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Stent area measured at the co-registered IVUS site with maximal calcium arc

  7. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Site of Maximum Calcium Density

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Stent area measured at the co-registered CT-identified region of greatest Hounsfield Unit (HU) calcium density.

  8. Procedural Efficiency: Relative Stent Expansion

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Percentage expansion calculated as:

    MSA ÷ mean distal reference lumen area × 100.

  9. Procedural Efficiency: Number of Calcium Fractures

    Time frame: Post-modification, pre-stent

    Fractures identified on intermediary IVUS after calcium modification.

  10. Procedural Efficiency: Change in Plaque Attenuation

    Time frame: Post-modification, pre-stent

    Change in IVUS plaque characteristics following calcium modification.Angiographic Endpoints

  11. Procedural Efficiency: Final Minimal Lumen Diameter

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Minimum lumen diameter by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)

  12. Procedural Efficiency: Final Percent Diameter Stenosis

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Percent stenosis of treated lesion after PCI, by QCA

  13. Procedural Efficiency: Final TIMI Flow Grade

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Target vessel flow graded 0-3 based on TIMI criteria. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade is a 0-3 angiographic scale used during coronary angiography to describe how well blood is flowing through a coronary artery.TIMI 0 No perfusion, TIMI 1 Penetration without perfusion, TIMI 2 Partial perfusion TIMI 3 Complete perfusion (normal flow)

  14. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    According to Coronary dissection (NHLBI classification)

  15. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    According to Coronary perforation (Ellis classification)

  16. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Slow-flow / no-reflow

  17. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Side branch closure (TIMI 0-1)

  18. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Procedural Success

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

    Final stenosis <30%, TIMI 3 flow, no angiographic complications, and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

  19. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction (Type 4a MI)

    Time frame: Day 0-1

    Defined by ARC-2 and 4th Universal Definition of MI (troponin criteria + evidence of ischemia).

  20. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Stent Thrombosis

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    Definite or probable stent thrombosis according to ARC-2 definitions.

  21. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Residual Angina (SAQ-7 Angina Frequency)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Residual angina defined as SAQ-7 Angina Frequency score <100. Angina frequency represent how often a patient has had angina (chest pain/discomfort) over a recent recall period. Reported as a 0 to 100 scale: 100 = no angina; 0 = angina occurring very frequently

  22. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Change in Angina (SAQ-7)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

    Change in angina frequency domain score; positive values indicate improvement. Angina frequency represent how often a patient has had angina (chest pain/discomfort) over a recent recall period. Reported as a 0 to 100 scale: 100 = no angina; 0 = angina occurring very frequently

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

CARLOS COLLET, MD,PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

001 917 753 6695

CAROLINA FOCELLA

CONTACT

[email protected]

001 917 753 6695

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundación EPIC

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.